• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Conceptual approaches in combating health inequity: A scoping review protocol.对抗健康不平等的概念方法:范围综述方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 15;18(3):e0282858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282858. eCollection 2023.
2
Equity and gender mainstreaming in public policy: A scoping review protocol.公共政策中的公平与性别平等主流化:范围综述方案
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0299124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299124. eCollection 2024.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Equity in Basic Medical Education accreditation standards: a scoping review protocol.基础医学教育认证标准中的公平性:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 7;15(1):e086661. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086661.
5
Policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in West Africa: a scoping review protocol.西非应对 COVID-19 大流行的政策措施:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 10;13(12):e079810. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079810.
6
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
7
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on intra-household gender disparities in the Middle East and North Africa region: A scoping review protocol.新冠疫情对中东和北非地区家庭内性别差异的影响:范围综述方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 18;19(11):e0313838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313838. eCollection 2024.
8
Global Health Governance and Health Equity in the Context of COVID-19: A Scoping Review.COVID-19背景下的全球卫生治理与健康公平:一项范围综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Mar 15;10(3):540. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10030540.
9
Social prescribing for children and youth: A scoping review protocol.社交处方用于儿童和青少年:范围综述方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 8;19(3):e0297535. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297535. eCollection 2024.
10
Uterine fibroids and Black people of African descent globally: a scoping review protocol.全球范围内的子宫肌瘤和非裔非洲人:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 25;14(8):e085622. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085622.

引用本文的文献

1
Best practices of judicial governance: A scoping review protocol.司法治理的最佳实践:一项范围综述方案。
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 28;20(8):e0329904. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329904. eCollection 2025.
2
What opportunities exist for the governance of private sector engagement in mixed health systems in the African Region?非洲区域混合卫生系统中私营部门参与的治理存在哪些机遇?
J Glob Health. 2025 Aug 22;15:03038. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.03038.
3
How do World Health Organization technical officers working on noncommunicable diseases approach health equity?世界卫生组织负责非传染性疾病的技术官员如何看待健康公平问题?
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jul 23;24(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02552-w.
4
How do high-level African directors of policy and planning operationalize health equity? Findings from a regional survey.非洲高级政策与规划主管如何实施卫生公平?一项区域调查的结果
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Mar 26;5(3):e0004384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004384. eCollection 2025.
5
Health equity and distributive justice: views of high-level African policymakers.健康公平与分配正义:非洲高级政策制定者的观点
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Dec 23;25(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01154-5.
6
Investigating inconsistencies regarding health equity in select World Health Organization texts: a critical discourse analysis of health promotion, social determinants of health, and urban health texts, 2008-2016.调查世界卫生组织部分文本中关于健康公平性的不一致之处:对2008 - 2016年健康促进、健康的社会决定因素及城市健康文本的批判性话语分析
BMC Glob Public Health. 2024 Dec 4;2(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s44263-024-00106-w.
7
Health promotion, the social determinants of health, and urban health: what does a critical discourse analysis of World Health Organization texts reveal about health equity?健康促进、健康的社会决定因素与城市健康:对世界卫生组织文本的批判性话语分析揭示了哪些关于健康公平的内容?
BMC Glob Public Health. 2023 Dec 1;1(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s44263-023-00023-4.
8
Equity and gender mainstreaming in public policy: A scoping review protocol.公共政策中的公平与性别平等主流化:范围综述方案
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 23;19(2):e0299124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299124. eCollection 2024.
9
Assessing the governance environment for private sector engagement in health in Africa: Results from a multi-country survey.评估非洲私营部门参与卫生事务的治理环境:来自多国调查的结果。
J Glob Health. 2023 Oct 6;13:04113. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04113.

本文引用的文献

1
Prioritizing gender equity and intersectionality in Canadian global health institutions and partnerships.在加拿大全球卫生机构及伙伴关系中优先考虑性别平等和交叉性。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Oct 4;2(10):e0001105. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001105. eCollection 2022.
2
An umbrella review of intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to health policy.针对卫生政策的跨部门和多部门方法的伞式综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Dec;315:115469. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115469. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
3
Probing key informants' views of health equity within the World Health Organization's Urban HEART initiative.探究世界卫生组织城市心脏倡议中关键知情人对健康公平性的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Oct 31;22(1):1989. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14395-z.
4
Evaluating healthy cities: A scoping review protocol.评估健康城市:范围综述方案
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 20;17(10):e0276179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276179. eCollection 2022.
5
Improving Health Equity by Screening for Poverty: A Survey of Family Physician Screening Behaviors and Perceptions in Toronto, Canada.通过筛查贫困改善健康公平性:加拿大多伦多家庭医生筛查行为与认知的调查
Health Equity. 2022 Feb 14;6(1):124-131. doi: 10.1089/heq.2021.0074. eCollection 2022.
6
Healthy Governance for Cities: Synergizing Health in All Policies (HiAP) and Healthy Cities Approaches.城市健康治理:整合“健康融入所有政策”(HiAP)与健康城市方法
J Urban Health. 2022 Apr;99(2):231-234. doi: 10.1007/s11524-022-00618-6. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
7
Intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to health policy: an umbrella review protocol.跨部门和多部门方法在卫生政策中的应用:综述方案。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Feb 15;20(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00826-1.
8
Policy responses to COVID-19 present a window of opportunity for a paradigm shift in global health policy: An application of the Multiple Streams Framework as a heuristic.应对 COVID-19 的政策为全球卫生政策范式转变提供了一个契机:多源流框架作为一种启发式方法的应用。
Glob Public Health. 2021 Aug-Sep;16(8-9):1187-1197. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2021.1925942. Epub 2021 May 27.
9
Scoping review of the World Health Organization's underlying equity discourses: apparent ambiguities, inadequacy, and contradictions.世界卫生组织基本公平话语的范围审查:明显的歧义、不足和矛盾。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Mar 3;20(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01400-x.
10
Universal health coverage for the poorest billion: justice and equity considerations.为最贫困的十亿人口提供全民健康覆盖:正义与公平方面的考量
Lancet. 2021 Feb 6;397(10273):472-473. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32383-7.

对抗健康不平等的概念方法:范围综述方案。

Conceptual approaches in combating health inequity: A scoping review protocol.

机构信息

Takemi Program in International Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States of America.

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Mar 15;18(3):e0282858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282858. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0282858
PMID:36920932
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10016682/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

What are the different ways in which health equity can be sought through policy and programs? Although there is a central focus on health equity in global and public health, we recognize that stakeholders can understand health equity as taking different approaches and that there is not a single conceptual approach. However, information on conceptual categories of actions to improve health equity and/or reduce health inequity is scarce. Therefore, this study asks the research question: "what conceptual approaches exist in striving for health equity and/or reducing health inequity?" with the aim of presenting a comprehensive overview of approaches.

METHODS

A scoping review will be undertaken following the PRISMA guidelines for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and in consultation with a research librarian. Both the peer-reviewed and grey literatures will be searched using: Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, PAIS Index (ProQuest), JSTOR, Canadian Public Documents Collection, the World Health Organization IRIS (Institutional Repository for Information Sharing), and supplemented by a Google Advanced Search. Screening will be conducted by two independent reviewers and data will be charted, coded, and narratively synthesized.

DISCUSSION

We anticipate developing a foundational document compiling categories of approaches and discussing the nuances inherent in each conceptualization to promote clarified and united action.

摘要

简介

通过政策和项目追求健康公平有哪些不同的方式?尽管全球和公共卫生都将健康公平作为重点,但我们认识到利益相关者可以理解健康公平采取不同的方法,而且不存在单一的概念方法。然而,关于改善健康公平和/或减少健康不公平的行动的概念性类别信息很少。因此,本研究提出了一个研究问题:“在追求健康公平和/或减少健康不公平方面存在哪些概念性方法?”目的是全面概述这些方法。

方法

将按照 PRISMA 范围审查指南(PRISMA-ScR)并与研究图书馆员协商进行范围审查。将使用:Ovid MEDLINE、Scopus、PAIS Index(ProQuest)、JSTOR、加拿大公共文件集、世界卫生组织 IRIS(信息共享机构知识库)以及 Google 高级搜索对同行评审文献和灰色文献进行搜索。筛选将由两名独立审查员进行,数据将进行图表、编码和叙述性综合。

讨论

我们预计将编制一份基础性文件,汇编方法类别,并讨论每个概念化中固有的细微差别,以促进明确和统一的行动。