AI Center, Inventec Corporation, Taipei, 111, Taiwan.
Sci Data. 2023 Mar 21;10(1):149. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02020-6.
Blood Pressure (BP) is an important cardiovascular health indicator. BP is usually monitored non-invasively with a cuff-based device, which can be bulky and inconvenient. Thus, continuous and portable BP monitoring devices, such as those based on a photoplethysmography (PPG) waveform, are desirable. In particular, Machine Learning (ML) based BP estimation approaches have gained considerable attention as they have the potential to estimate intermittent or continuous BP with only a single PPG measurement. Over the last few years, many ML-based BP estimation approaches have been proposed with no agreement on their modeling methodology. To ease the model comparison, we designed a benchmark with four open datasets with shared preprocessing, the right validation strategy avoiding information shift and leak, and standard evaluation metrics. We also adapted Mean Absolute Scaled Error (MASE) to improve the interpretability of model evaluation, especially across different BP datasets. The proposed benchmark comes with open datasets and codes. We showcase its effectiveness by comparing 11 ML-based approaches of three different categories.
血压(BP)是重要的心血管健康指标。BP 通常通过基于袖带的设备进行非侵入式监测,但该设备体积庞大且使用不便。因此,需要连续且便携的 BP 监测设备,例如基于光电容积脉搏波(PPG)波形的设备。特别是,基于机器学习(ML)的 BP 估计方法引起了广泛关注,因为它们有可能仅通过单次 PPG 测量来估计间歇性或连续性 BP。在过去几年中,已经提出了许多基于 ML 的 BP 估计方法,但它们的建模方法尚未达成共识。为了便于模型比较,我们设计了一个基准,其中包含四个具有共享预处理、正确验证策略以避免信息转移和泄漏以及标准评估指标的公开数据集。我们还采用平均绝对比例误差(MASE)来提高模型评估的可解释性,尤其是在不同的 BP 数据集之间。该基准带有公开数据集和代码。我们通过比较三种不同类别的 11 种基于 ML 的方法展示了其有效性。