Suppr超能文献

新型冠状病毒肺炎的有效接触者追踪:一项系统评价。

Effective contact tracing for COVID-19: A systematic review.

作者信息

Juneau Carl-Etienne, Briand Anne-Sara, Collazzo Pablo, Siebert Uwe, Pueyo Tomas

机构信息

Direction régionale de santé publique, CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

École de santé publique, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Glob Epidemiol. 2023 Dec;5:100103. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100103. Epub 2023 Mar 9.

Abstract

Contact tracing is commonly recommended to control outbreaks of COVID-19, but its effectiveness is unclear. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched four databases using a range of terms related to contact tracing effectiveness for COVID-19. We found 343 papers; 32 were included. All were observational or modelling studies. Observational studies ( = 14) provided consistent, very-low certainty evidence that contact tracing (alone or in combination with other interventions) was associated with better control of COVID-19 (e.g. in Hong Kong, only 1084 cases and four deaths were recorded in the first 4.5 months of the pandemic). Modelling studies ( = 18) provided consistent, high-certainty evidence that under assumptions of prompt and thorough tracing with effective quarantines, contact tracing could stop the spread of COVID-19 (e.g. by reducing the reproduction number from 2.2 to 0.57). A cautious interpretation indicates that to stop the spread of COVID-19, public health practitioners have 2-3 days from the time a new case develops symptoms to isolate the case and quarantine at least 80% of its contacts.

摘要

接触者追踪通常被推荐用于控制新冠疫情的爆发,但其有效性尚不清楚。按照系统评价与荟萃分析优先报告条目(PRISMA)指南,我们使用一系列与新冠疫情接触者追踪有效性相关的术语搜索了四个数据库。我们找到了343篇论文;纳入了32篇。所有研究均为观察性研究或模型研究。观察性研究(n = 14)提供了一致性的、极低确定性的证据,表明接触者追踪(单独或与其他干预措施联合使用)与更好地控制新冠疫情相关(例如,在香港,疫情爆发的前4.5个月仅记录了1084例病例和4例死亡)。模型研究(n = 18)提供了一致性的、高确定性的证据,表明在及时且彻底追踪并实施有效隔离的假设下,接触者追踪可以阻止新冠疫情的传播(例如,通过将再生数从2.2降至0.57)。谨慎的解读表明,为了阻止新冠疫情的传播,公共卫生从业者需要在新病例出现症状后的2至3天内隔离该病例,并对至少80%的接触者进行检疫。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Contact tracing strategies for infectious diseases: A systematic literature review.传染病接触者追踪策略:一项系统文献综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 May 9;5(5):e0004579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004579. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

8
Can digital contact tracing make up for lost time?数字接触者追踪能否弥补失去的时间?
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Aug;5(8):e417-e418. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30160-2. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
10
Contact Tracing during Coronavirus Disease Outbreak, South Korea, 2020.2020 年韩国冠状病毒病疫情期间的接触者追踪。
Emerg Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;26(10):2465-2468. doi: 10.3201/eid2610.201315. Epub 2020 Jul 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验