Functional Recovery Unit, Guadarrama Hospital, 28440 Madrid, Spain.
Research Group in Nursing and Health Care, Puerta de Hierro Health Research Institute-Segovia de Arana (IDIPHISA), 28222 Majadahonda, Spain.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Mar 7;59(3):516. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030516.
: Pressure ulcers are a public health problem given the impact that they have on morbidity, mortality and the quality of life and participation of patients who suffer from them. Therefore, the main objective of this study was to evaluate the presence of differences in the radiofrequency parameters applied to complex pressure ulcers throughout the sessions and between the right and left leg. As a secondary objective, the subjective perceptions of the effects of the treatment by both the patients and the practitioner were analyzed. : We performed a secondary analysis of data from a prospective study involving 36 patients from the Hospital de Guadarrama in Madrid, Spain, who presented ulcers in the lower limbs. Ten treatment sessions of radiofrequency were administered with a frequency of one session/week, collecting the data referring to the variables in each of the sessions. The main outcome variables were the radiofrequency parameters automatically adjusted in each session and that referred to the frequency (Hz), maximum and average power (W), absorbed energy by the ulcer (J/cm2) and temperature (°C) reached by the tissues. On the other hand, the subjective perception of the results was evaluated using the Global Response Assessment (GRA), a Likert-type scale that scores the treatment results from 1 (significantly worse) to 5 (significantly better). Likewise, the satisfaction of both the patients and the professional were evaluated using a 10-point numerical scale. : The ANOVA test showed significant differences ( < 0.05) throughout the sessions except in patient satisfaction. The ANOVA test showed significant differences ( < 0.05) between both legs and over time in all parameters except for frequency. The presence of significant differences ( < 0.05) was observed over time between legs compared to the initial values in the absorbed energy and in temperature, with higher final values in the absorbed energy in the left leg compared to the right (26.31 ± 3.75 W vs. 17.36 ± 5.66 W) and a moderate effect on both (R = 0.471 and 0.492, respectively). The near absence of changes in the satisfaction of both the patients and the professional was observed, while the score in the GRA decreased continuously throughout the sessions. : Radiofrequency parameters are indicative of an improved clinical response to ulcers. In addition, higher radiofrequency exposure increases healing capacity. However, the subjective perception of treatment outcomes worsened, which may be related to the chronic nature of the ulcers, leading to patients' expectations not being met.
压力性溃疡是一个公共卫生问题,因为它会影响患者的发病率、死亡率以及生活质量和参与度。因此,本研究的主要目的是评估在整个治疗过程中以及左右腿之间,应用于复杂性压力性溃疡的射频参数是否存在差异。作为次要目标,分析了患者和医生对治疗效果的主观感受。
我们对西班牙马德里瓜达拉玛医院的 36 名下肢溃疡患者的前瞻性研究数据进行了二次分析。每周进行一次射频治疗,共进行 10 次治疗,每次治疗均收集与变量相关的数据。主要的结局变量是每次治疗时自动调整的射频参数,以及频率(Hz)、最大功率和平均功率(W)、溃疡吸收的能量(J/cm2)和组织达到的温度(°C)。另一方面,使用全球反应评估(GRA)量表评估治疗结果的主观感受,这是一种李克特量表,对治疗结果进行评分,范围从 1(明显恶化)到 5(明显改善)。同样,使用 10 分制数字量表评估了患者和专业人员的满意度。
方差分析(ANOVA)显示,除了患者满意度外,在整个治疗过程中均存在显著差异(<0.05)。除了频率外,左右腿之间以及随时间的变化均存在显著差异(<0.05)。除了频率外,在整个治疗过程中,与初始值相比,左右腿之间的吸收能量和温度均存在显著差异(<0.05),左腿的吸收能量和温度的最终值较高,与右腿相比,吸收能量的差异有统计学意义(26.31 ± 3.75 W 比 17.36 ± 5.66 W),且效果中等(R = 0.471 和 0.492)。患者和专业人员的满意度几乎没有变化,而 GRA 评分在整个治疗过程中持续下降。
射频参数表明溃疡的临床反应得到改善。此外,更高的射频暴露度增加了愈合能力。然而,治疗效果的主观感受恶化,这可能与溃疡的慢性性质有关,导致患者的期望无法得到满足。