Huntington Rachelle N, Badgett Natalie M, Rosenberg Nancy E, Greeny Kaitlin, Bravo Alice, Bristol Roxanne M, Byun Young Hee, Park Madelynn S
College of Education, Northern Arizona University, Eastburn Education 207c, 639 Riordan Ranch Street, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 USA.
College of Education and Human Services, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL USA.
Perspect Behav Sci. 2022 Dec 28;46(1):201-215. doi: 10.1007/s40614-022-00364-9. eCollection 2023 Mar.
Through the application of behavioral principles, behavior analysts seek to produce socially meaningful behavior change, defined as alterations in behavior that yield important outcomes immediately beneficial for the direct consumers of interventions and key stakeholders. Behavioral practitioners and researchers often engage in assessment and reporting of the meaningfulness of behavior change using social validity assessments. These assessments ensure that target behaviors are appropriately selected, intervention procedures are acceptable, and satisfactory outcomes are produced. The purpose of this review is to identify the current state of social validity within behavioral literature. We reviewed eight peer-reviewed journals between 2010 and 2020. We found that 47% of the intervention studies reviewed included a social validity assessment. Social validity assessment across journals has increased over time, with a significant rise from 2019 to 2020. Implications of these findings and suggestions for future work are discussed.
通过应用行为原则,行为分析师试图促成具有社会意义的行为改变,这种改变被定义为行为上的变化,能立即产生对干预的直接受益者和关键利益相关者有益的重要结果。行为从业者和研究人员经常使用社会效度评估来进行行为改变意义的评估和报告。这些评估确保目标行为被恰当选择、干预程序是可接受的,并能产生令人满意的结果。本综述的目的是确定行为学文献中社会效度的当前状况。我们查阅了2010年至2020年期间的八本同行评审期刊。我们发现,所审查的干预研究中有47%包括社会效度评估。跨期刊的社会效度评估随时间有所增加,从2019年到2020年有显著上升。本文讨论了这些发现的意义以及对未来工作的建议。