Suppr超能文献

护理形象测量工具的心理测量学特性:系统评价。

The psychometric properties of nursing image measurement instruments: A systematic review.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Yunnan University of Chinese Medicine, Kunming, China.

Chakrabongse Bhuvanarth International Institute for Interdisciplinary Studies, Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-OK, Chonburi, Thailand.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2023 Aug;10(8):5056-5078. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1742. Epub 2023 Apr 22.

Abstract

AIM

To identify the measures assessing the nursing image, and to analyse, evaluate and synthesize the psychometric properties of these available instruments.

DESIGN

A systematic review of the psychometric properties of instruments assessing the nursing image. The system review has been registered in the PROSPERO database with the registration number CRD42020221511.

METHODS

The systematic review was conducted according to COSMIN guidelines. Search strategies were run in CINAHL, MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, COSMIN systematic review database, Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracting the psychometric properties of the included study characteristics and instruments. The methodological quality of the studies, instrument measurement performance, risk of bias and grade of evidence were evaluated and disagreements were resolved via discussion.

RESULTS

The search strategy yielded a total of 24 studies and 11 instruments assessing nursing image. None of the measures fulfilled all criteria in the COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist. The Nurses Self-Concept Instrument (NSCI) and the Nurses Self-Concept Questionnaire (NSCQ) were recommended for measuring the professional image of nursing, and the Nursing Brand Image Scale (NBIS) have the potential to be recommended for measuring a more comprehensive image of nursing. Every instrument evaluated in this review had different characteristics in the nursing image (e.g. the traditional image, the professional image, and the brand image). Therefore, the selection of the most appropriate instrument depends on the psychometrics, the context and the aim of the assessment.

摘要

目的

确定评估护理形象的测量指标,并分析、评价和综合这些现有工具的心理测量学特性。

设计

评估护理形象的工具的心理测量学特性的系统评价。系统评价已在 PROSPERO 数据库中注册,注册号为 CRD42020221511。

方法

系统评价按照 COSMIN 指南进行。搜索策略在 CINAHL、MEDLINE、APA PsycINFO、Web of Science、Scopus、COSMIN 系统评价数据库、 Cochrane 图书馆和中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)中进行。两名评审员独立筛选研究,提取纳入研究特征和工具的心理测量学特性。对研究的方法学质量、仪器测量性能、偏倚风险和证据等级进行评估,并通过讨论解决分歧。

结果

搜索策略共产生了 24 项研究和 11 种评估护理形象的工具。没有一种测量方法完全符合 COSMIN 偏倚风险检查表中的所有标准。护士自我概念量表(NSCI)和护士自我概念问卷(NSCQ)被推荐用于测量护理的专业形象,护理品牌形象量表(NBIS)有可能被推荐用于测量更全面的护理形象。本评价中评估的每一种工具在护理形象方面都有不同的特点(例如传统形象、专业形象和品牌形象)。因此,最合适的工具的选择取决于心理测量学、背景和评估目的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5c4/10333846/73f1f7430374/NOP2-10-5056-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验