Prakofjewa Julia, Sartori Matteo, Šarka Povilas, Kalle Raivo, Pieroni Andrea, Sõukand Renata
Department of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Via Torino 155, 30172 Venezia, Italy.
Department of History, University of Concepción, Edmundo Larenas 240, Concepción 4030000, Chile.
Biology (Basel). 2023 Apr 9;12(4):571. doi: 10.3390/biology12040571.
The circulation of local ecological knowledge (LEK) is a promising avenue of research for wild plant studies. To encourage the acceptance, celebration, and appreciation of biocultural diversity, which is rapidly disappearing nowadays, we need to estimate and assess multifaceted local ecological knowledge. It has direct application for local communities in informing effective policies for improving food security and building community-specific responses to environmental and social transitions. The present study draws on data collected among two ethnic groups-Lithuanians and Poles-via 200 semi-structured in-depth interviews and participant observation conducted in 2018 and 2019 in Podlasie Voivodeship (Poland), the Vilnius Region (Lithuania), and the Hrodna Region (Belarus). We aimed to observe LEK circulation in the border area through cross-ethnic and cross-country comparisons. A total of 2812 detailed use reports of wild plants were recorded. In total, 72 wild plant taxa belonging to 33 plant families were used across the food domain. Our findings show that cross-country differences were minimal, while there was some variation between the ethnic groups selected as case studies. We emphasize the need, in future studies, to combine quantitative research with qualitative approaches in order to more thoroughly identify peculiarities of cross-border circulation as a reservoir for community food resilience and biocultural diversity.
当地生态知识(LEK)的传播是野生植物研究中一个很有前景的研究途径。为了鼓励人们接受、颂扬和欣赏如今正在迅速消失的生物文化多样性,我们需要对多方面的当地生态知识进行评估。它对当地社区有着直接应用价值,有助于制定有效的政策来改善粮食安全,并针对环境和社会转型制定特定社区的应对措施。本研究借鉴了2018年和2019年在波兰波德拉谢省、立陶宛维尔纽斯地区和白俄罗斯格罗德诺地区,通过对立陶宛人和波兰人这两个民族进行200次半结构化深度访谈和参与观察所收集的数据。我们旨在通过跨民族和跨国比较来观察边境地区当地生态知识的传播情况。共记录了2812份关于野生植物的详细使用报告。在食品领域,总共使用了隶属于33个植物科的72种野生植物类群。我们的研究结果表明,跨国差异极小,而作为案例研究的不同民族之间存在一些差异。我们强调,在未来的研究中,有必要将定量研究与定性方法相结合,以便更全面地识别跨境传播的特点,将其作为社区粮食复原力和生物文化多样性的一个宝库。