• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重新审视中国电动汽车生命周期温室气体排放:边际排放视角

Revisiting electric vehicle life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in China: A marginal emission perspective.

作者信息

Zhong Zewei, Yu Yang, Zhao Xiaoli

机构信息

School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102299, China.

Institute for Low Carbon Economy and Policy, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102299, China.

出版信息

iScience. 2023 Apr 4;26(5):106565. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106565. eCollection 2023 May 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2023.106565
PMID:37250332
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10214282/
Abstract

The accurate estimation of electric vehicle (EV) life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is critical for policymakers to predict and manage the reduction of GHG emissions due to transportation electrification. Most previous studies in the Chinese context evaluated the EV life cycle GHG based on the annual average emission factor (AAEF). However, the hourly marginal emission factor (HMEF), which is conceptually more appropriate than AAEF for evaluating the GHG implications of EV growth, has not been applied in China. This study fills this gap by estimating the EV life cycle GHG in China based on the HMEF and comparing it with AAEF-based estimates. It is found that the estimates based on the AAEF substantially underestimate the EV life cycle GHG in China. Moreover, the influences of the electricity marketization reform and changes in the EV charging mode on the EV life cycle GHG in China are analyzed.

摘要

准确估算电动汽车(EV)生命周期温室气体(GHG)排放量,对于政策制定者预测和管理因交通电气化导致的温室气体减排至关重要。中国此前的大多数研究基于年均排放因子(AAEF)评估电动汽车生命周期温室气体。然而,小时边际排放因子(HMEF)在概念上比AAEF更适合评估电动汽车增长对温室气体的影响,在中国尚未得到应用。本研究通过基于HMEF估算中国电动汽车生命周期温室气体并将其与基于AAEF的估算进行比较,填补了这一空白。研究发现,基于AAEF的估算大幅低估了中国电动汽车生命周期温室气体。此外,还分析了电力市场化改革和电动汽车充电模式变化对中国电动汽车生命周期温室气体的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f8f/10214282/a0d1b56f8857/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f8f/10214282/e8c2cfcbcce7/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f8f/10214282/0629f21d27fc/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f8f/10214282/d91a7ce7d5ea/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f8f/10214282/2bee3819454c/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f8f/10214282/2e9c04743860/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f8f/10214282/a0d1b56f8857/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f8f/10214282/e8c2cfcbcce7/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f8f/10214282/0629f21d27fc/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f8f/10214282/d91a7ce7d5ea/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f8f/10214282/2bee3819454c/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f8f/10214282/2e9c04743860/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f8f/10214282/a0d1b56f8857/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Revisiting electric vehicle life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in China: A marginal emission perspective.重新审视中国电动汽车生命周期温室气体排放:边际排放视角
iScience. 2023 Apr 4;26(5):106565. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106565. eCollection 2023 May 19.
2
Marginal Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Ontario's Electricity System and the Implications of Electric Vehicle Charging.安大略省电力系统的边际温室气体排放及其对电动汽车充电的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Jul 2;53(13):7903-7912. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b01519. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
3
Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of electric versus combustion vehicles from 2018 to 2030 in the US.2018 年至 2030 年美国电动汽车与燃油汽车的全生命周期温室气体排放对比。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Apr 15;308:114592. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114592. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
4
Greenhouse gas emission benefits of adopting new energy vehicles in Suzhou City, China: A case study.中国苏州市采用新能源汽车的温室气体排放效益:一项案例研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Oct;29(50):76286-76297. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21284-w. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
5
Transport oil product consumption and GHG emission reduction potential in China: An electric vehicle-based scenario analysis.中国油品运输领域产品能耗及温室气体减排潜力:基于电动汽车的情景分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 16;14(9):e0222448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222448. eCollection 2019.
6
Which type of electric vehicle is worth promoting mostly in the context of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality? A case study for a metropolis in China.在碳达峰和碳中和的背景下,哪种类型的电动汽车最值得推广?以中国一特大城市为例。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 1;837:155626. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155626. Epub 2022 May 2.
7
Mitigating life cycle GHG emissions of roads to be built through 2030: Case study of a Chinese province.缓解 2030 年前建成道路的生命周期温室气体排放:以中国某省为例。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Oct 1;319:115512. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115512. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
8
Impact assessment of crude oil mix, electricity generation mix, and vehicle technology on road freight emission reduction in China.评估原油混合、发电组合和车辆技术对中国道路货运减排的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(10):27763-27781. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24150-x. Epub 2022 Nov 16.
9
Life cycle assessment of shared electric bicycle on greenhouse gas emissions in China.中国共享电动自行车生命周期温室气体排放评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Feb 20;860:160546. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160546. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
10
Provincial Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Gasoline and Plug-in Electric Vehicles in China: Comparison from the Consumption-Based Electricity Perspective.中国汽油车和插电式电动车的省级温室气体排放:基于消费电力视角的比较。
Environ Sci Technol. 2021 May 18;55(10):6944-6956. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c08217. Epub 2021 May 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Why marginal CO emissions are not decreasing for US electricity: Estimates and implications for climate policy.为什么美国电力的边际 CO 排放没有减少:估计和对气候政策的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Feb 22;119(8). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116632119.
2
Reducing the life cycle environmental impact of electric vehicles through emissions-responsive charging.通过排放响应式充电降低电动汽车的生命周期环境影响。
iScience. 2021 Nov 22;24(12):103499. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103499. eCollection 2021 Dec 17.
3
Combined solar power and storage as cost-competitive and grid-compatible supply for China's future carbon-neutral electricity system.
太阳能与储能相结合,成为中国未来碳中和电力系统中具有成本竞争力和电网兼容性的供应方式。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Oct 19;118(42). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2103471118.
4
Reduced-Order Dispatch Model for Simulating Marginal Emissions Factors for the United States Power Sector.用于模拟美国电力部门边际排放因子的降阶调度模型。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Sep 3;53(17):10506-10513. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b02500. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
5
Current Emissions and Future Mitigation Pathways of Coal-Fired Power Plants in China from 2010 to 2030.中国 2010 年至 2030 年燃煤电厂的当前排放和未来减排途径。
Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Nov 6;52(21):12905-12914. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b02919. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
6
Regional Variability and Uncertainty of Electric Vehicle Life Cycle CO₂ Emissions across the United States.美国电动汽车生命周期二氧化碳排放的区域差异和不确定性。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Jul 21;49(14):8844-55. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00815. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
7
Emissions and Cost Implications of Controlled Electric Vehicle Charging in the U.S. PJM Interconnection.美国 PJM 互联电网中控制电动汽车充电的排放和成本影响
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 May 5;49(9):5813-9. doi: 10.1021/es505822f. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
8
Effects of regional temperature on electric vehicle efficiency, range, and emissions in the United States.区域温度对美国电动汽车效率、续航里程和排放的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Mar 17;49(6):3974-80. doi: 10.1021/es505621s. Epub 2015 Feb 24.