• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经济、社会和环境溢出效应会降低全球饮食结构转变带来的好处。

Economic, social and environmental spillovers decrease the benefits of a global dietary shift.

机构信息

Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Policy, Wageningen University and Wageningen Economic Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Department of International Policy, Wageningen University and Wageningen Economic Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Nat Food. 2023 Jun;4(6):496-507. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00769-y. Epub 2023 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1038/s43016-023-00769-y
PMID:37277490
Abstract

Dietary shifts are key for enhancing the sustainability of current food systems but need to account for potential economic, social and environmental indirect effects as well. By tracing physical quantities of biomass along supply chains in a global economic model, we investigate the benefits of adopting the EAT-Lancet diet and other social, economic and environmental spillovers in the wider economy. We find that decreased global food demand reduces global biomass production, food prices, trade, land use and food loss and waste but also reduces food affordability for low-income agricultural households. In sub-Saharan Africa, increased food demand and higher prices decrease food affordability also for non-agricultural households. Economic spillovers into non-food sectors limit agricultural land and greenhouse gas reductions as cheaper biomass is demanded more for non-food use. From an environmental perspective, economy-wide greenhouse gas emissions increase as lower global food demand at lower prices frees income subsequently spent on non-food items.

摘要

饮食结构的转变对于提高当前食品系统的可持续性至关重要,但也需要考虑到潜在的经济、社会和环境间接影响。通过在全球经济模型中追踪供应链中的生物质物理数量,我们研究了采用 EAT-Lancet 饮食和其他社会、经济和环境溢出效应对更广泛经济的好处。我们发现,全球粮食需求的减少降低了全球生物质生产、粮食价格、贸易、土地利用和粮食损失和浪费,但也降低了低收入农业家庭的粮食可负担性。在撒哈拉以南非洲,粮食需求的增加和价格的上涨也降低了非农业家庭的粮食可负担性。对非食品部门的经济溢出效应限制了农业用地和温室气体的减少,因为对非食品用途的生物质需求增加,价格更低。从环境角度来看,由于较低的全球粮食需求和较低的价格释放了收入,这些收入随后用于购买非食品,因此,全球范围内的温室气体排放增加。

相似文献

1
Economic, social and environmental spillovers decrease the benefits of a global dietary shift.经济、社会和环境溢出效应会降低全球饮食结构转变带来的好处。
Nat Food. 2023 Jun;4(6):496-507. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00769-y. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
2
Planetary boundaries under a land-based climate change mitigation scenario with a food demand transformation: a modelling study.基于土地的气候变化缓解情景下,伴随食物需求转变的行星边界:一项建模研究。
Lancet Planet Health. 2025 Jul 8. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(25)00087-7.
3
How Can the Environmental Impact of Orthopaedic Surgery Be Measured and Reduced? Using Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction as a Test Case.如何衡量和减少骨科手术对环境的影响?以前交叉韧带重建为例进行分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):7-19. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003242.
4
The Impact of Infrastructure on Low-Income Consumers' Nutritious Diet, Women's Economic Empowerment, and Gender Equality in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: An Evidence and Gap Map.基础设施对低收入和中等收入国家低收入消费者营养饮食、妇女经济赋权及性别平等的影响:证据与差距图
Campbell Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 18;21(3):e70050. doi: 10.1002/cl2.70050. eCollection 2025 Sep.
5
Unconditional cash transfers for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities: effect on use of health services and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries.用于减少贫困和脆弱性的无条件现金转移:对低收入和中等收入国家卫生服务利用及健康结果的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 15;11(11):CD011135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011135.pub2.
6
Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco.用于改变食品、酒精饮料和烟草的选择及消费量的份量、包装或餐具尺寸。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 14;2015(9):CD011045. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011045.pub2.
7
The Impacts of Dietary Change on Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Land Use, Water Use, and Health: A Systematic Review.饮食变化对温室气体排放、土地利用、水资源利用和健康的影响:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 3;11(11):e0165797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165797. eCollection 2016.
8
Potential of shifting work hours for reducing heat-related loss and regional disparities in China: a modelling analysis.调整工作时间对减少中国与高温相关的损失及地区差异的潜力:一项建模分析。
Lancet Planet Health. 2025 Jul 3. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(25)00079-8.
9
A systematic evaluation of seven different scores representing the EAT-Lancet reference diet and mortality, stroke, and greenhouse gas emissions in three cohorts.对三种队列中七种不同的 EAT-Lancet 参考饮食评分与死亡率、卒中及温室气体排放的系统评价。
Lancet Planet Health. 2024 Jun;8(6):e391-e401. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00094-9.
10
Unconditional cash transfers for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities: effect on use of health services and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries.无条件现金转移以减少贫困和脆弱性:对中低收入国家卫生服务利用和健康结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 29;3(3):CD011135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011135.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Rebound effects may undermine the benefits of upcycling food waste and food processing by-products as animal feed in China.在中国,反弹效应可能会削弱将食物垃圾和食品加工副产品作为动物饲料进行升级回收利用所带来的益处。
Nat Food. 2025 Aug 26. doi: 10.1038/s43016-025-01219-7.
2
Transitioning to healthy and sustainable diets has higher environmental and affordability trade-offs for emerging and developing economies.向健康且可持续的饮食过渡,对新兴经济体和发展中经济体而言,会带来更高的环境成本和可承受性权衡。
Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 27;16(1):3948. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59275-3.
3
Adoption of region-specific diets in China can help achieve gains in health and environmental sustainability.

本文引用的文献

1
Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions.食物系统产生的温室气体排放量占全球人为温室气体排放总量的三分之一。
Nat Food. 2021 Mar;2(3):198-209. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00225-9. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
2
Short- and long-term warming effects of methane may affect the cost-effectiveness of mitigation policies and benefits of low-meat diets.甲烷的短期和长期变暖效应可能会影响减排政策的成本效益以及低肉饮食的益处。
Nat Food. 2021 Dec;2(12):970-980. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00385-8. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
3
Food Losses and Waste: A Needed Assessment for Future Policies.
在中国推行具有地域特色的饮食,可以在增进健康和提高环境可持续性方面取得成效。
Nat Food. 2024 Sep;5(9):764-774. doi: 10.1038/s43016-024-01038-2. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
4
Global food expenditure patterns diverge between low-income and high-income countries.全球粮食支出模式在低收入国家和高收入国家之间存在差异。
Nat Food. 2024 Jul;5(7):592-602. doi: 10.1038/s43016-024-01012-y. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
5
Artificial Intelligence Applications to Public Health Nutrition.人工智能在公共卫生营养中的应用。
Nutrients. 2023 Oct 8;15(19):4285. doi: 10.3390/nu15194285.
6
Spillover effects of dietary transitions.饮食转变的溢出效应。
Nat Food. 2023 Jun;4(6):458-459. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00781-2.
食物损失和浪费:未来政策的必要评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 4;18(21):11586. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111586.
4
The global and regional costs of healthy and sustainable dietary patterns: a modelling study.全球和区域范围内健康可持续饮食模式的成本:建模研究。
Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Nov;5(11):e797-e807. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00251-5. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
5
Co-benefits from sustainable dietary shifts for population and environmental health: an assessment from a large European cohort study.可持续饮食转变对人口和环境健康的共同效益:来自大型欧洲队列研究的评估。
Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Nov;5(11):e786-e796. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00250-3. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
6
Affordability of the EAT-Lancet reference diet: a global analysis.EAT-柳叶刀参考饮食的负担能力:全球分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jan;8(1):e59-e66. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30447-4. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
7
Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.人类世的食物:EAT-柳叶刀可持续食物系统健康饮食委员会
Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):447-492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
8
Health and nutritional aspects of sustainable diet strategies and their association with environmental impacts: a global modelling analysis with country-level detail.可持续饮食策略的健康和营养方面及其与环境影响的关联:具有国家层面细节的全球建模分析。
Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Oct;2(10):e451-e461. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30206-7.
9
Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits.在环境限度内保持食物系统的选择。
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7728):519-525. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
10
Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers.通过生产者和消费者减少食物对环境的影响。
Science. 2018 Jun 1;360(6392):987-992. doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0216.