• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甲烷的短期和长期变暖效应可能会影响减排政策的成本效益以及低肉饮食的益处。

Short- and long-term warming effects of methane may affect the cost-effectiveness of mitigation policies and benefits of low-meat diets.

作者信息

Pérez-Domínguez Ignacio, Del Prado Agustin, Mittenzwei Klaus, Hristov Jordan, Frank Stefan, Tabeau Andrzej, Witzke Peter, Havlik Petr, van Meijl Hans, Lynch John, Stehfest Elke, Pardo Guillermo, Barreiro-Hurle Jesus, Koopman Jason F L, Sanz-Sánchez María José

机构信息

JRC, Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Seville, Spain.

BC3, Basque Centre for Climate Change, Bilbao, Spain.

出版信息

Nat Food. 2021 Dec;2(12):970-980. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00385-8. Epub 2021 Dec 13.

DOI:10.1038/s43016-021-00385-8
PMID:35146439
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7612339/
Abstract

Methane's short atmospheric life has important implications for the design of global climate change mitigation policies in agriculture. Three different agricultural economic models are used to explore how short- and long-term warming effects of methane can affect the cost-effectiveness of mitigation policies and dietary transitions. Results show that the choice of a particular metric for methane's warming potential is key to determine optimal mitigation options, with metrics based on shorter-term impacts leading to greater overall emission reduction. Also, the promotion of low-meat diets is more effective at reducing greenhouse gas emissions compared to carbon pricing when mitigation policies are based on metrics that reflect methane's long-term behaviour. A combination of stringent mitigation measures and dietary changes could achieve substantial emission reduction levels, helping reverse the contribution of agriculture to global warming.

摘要

甲烷在大气中的寿命较短,这对农业领域全球气候变化缓解政策的设计具有重要意义。研究使用了三种不同的农业经济模型,以探讨甲烷的短期和长期变暖效应如何影响缓解政策和饮食转变的成本效益。结果表明,选择特定的甲烷变暖潜能指标是确定最佳缓解方案的关键,基于短期影响的指标会带来更大幅度的总体减排。此外,当缓解政策基于反映甲烷长期行为的指标时,推广低肉饮食在减少温室气体排放方面比碳定价更有效。严格的缓解措施与饮食变化相结合,可以实现大幅减排,有助于扭转农业对全球变暖的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66f0/7612339/d2a600788539/EMS141014-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66f0/7612339/536b7ecde407/EMS141014-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66f0/7612339/8c8f61894d73/EMS141014-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66f0/7612339/9ccbc153b1db/EMS141014-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66f0/7612339/d2a600788539/EMS141014-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66f0/7612339/536b7ecde407/EMS141014-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66f0/7612339/8c8f61894d73/EMS141014-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66f0/7612339/9ccbc153b1db/EMS141014-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66f0/7612339/d2a600788539/EMS141014-f004.jpg

相似文献

1
Short- and long-term warming effects of methane may affect the cost-effectiveness of mitigation policies and benefits of low-meat diets.甲烷的短期和长期变暖效应可能会影响减排政策的成本效益以及低肉饮食的益处。
Nat Food. 2021 Dec;2(12):970-980. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00385-8. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
2
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
3
Enhanced atmospheric oxidation toward carbon neutrality reduces methane's climate forcing.增强大气氧化以实现碳中和可降低甲烷的气候强迫作用。
Nat Commun. 2024 Apr 11;15(1):3148. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47436-9.
4
Galyean appreciation club review: a holistic perspective of the societal relevance of beef production and its impacts on climate change.加利恩欣赏俱乐部评论:从整体角度看待牛肉生产的社会相关性及其对气候变化的影响。
J Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 3;101. doi: 10.1093/jas/skad024.
5
A comprehensive review on methane's dual role: effects in climate change and potential as a carbon-neutral energy source.关于甲烷双重角色的综合综述:气候变化影响及作为碳中性能源的潜力。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(7):10379-10394. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30601-w. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
6
Offsetting unabated agricultural emissions with CO2 removal to achieve ambitious climate targets.用二氧化碳去除来抵消未减少的农业排放,以实现雄心勃勃的气候目标。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 17;16(3):e0247887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247887. eCollection 2021.
7
Methane emissions: choosing the right climate metric and time horizon.甲烷排放:选择正确的气候指标和时间范围。
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2018 Oct 17;20(10):1323-1339. doi: 10.1039/c8em00414e.
8
Methane and the Paris Agreement temperature goals.甲烷与《巴黎协定》温度目标。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2022 Jan 24;380(2215):20200456. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0456. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
9
Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation).减少废弃物产生的全球温室气体排放:政府间气候变化专门委员会(IPCC)第四次评估报告的结论与策略。第三工作组(减缓气候变化)
Waste Manag Res. 2008 Feb;26(1):11-32. doi: 10.1177/0734242X07088433.
10
Labour productivity and economic impacts of carbon mitigation: a modelling study and benefit-cost analysis.碳减排的劳动生产率与经济影响:一项建模研究及效益成本分析
Lancet Planet Health. 2022 Dec;6(12):e941-e948. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00245-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Global methane footprints growth and drivers 1990-2023.1990 - 2023年全球甲烷足迹增长及驱动因素
Nat Commun. 2025 Sep 3;16(1):8184. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63383-5.
2
Recent stabilization of agricultural non-CO greenhouse gas emissions in China.中国近期农业非二氧化碳温室气体排放的稳定状况。
Natl Sci Rev. 2025 Feb 13;12(4):nwaf040. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwaf040. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Methane mitigation potentials and related costs of China's coal mines.中国煤矿甲烷减排潜力及相关成本

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-effective implementation of the Paris Agreement using flexible greenhouse gas metrics.使用灵活的温室气体指标以具有成本效益的方式实施《巴黎协定》。
Sci Adv. 2021 May 28;7(22). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf9020. Print 2021 May.
2
Global food system emissions could preclude achieving the 1.5° and 2°C climate change targets.全球食物系统排放可能使 1.5°C 和 2°C 的气候变化目标无法实现。
Science. 2020 Nov 6;370(6517):705-708. doi: 10.1126/science.aba7357.
3
Demonstrating GWP*: a means of reporting warming-equivalent emissions that captures the contrasting impacts of short- and longlived climate pollutants.
Fundam Res. 2023 Dec 29;4(6):1688-1695. doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2023.09.012. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Challenges for the balanced attribution of livestock's environmental impacts: the art of conveying simple messages around complex realities.牲畜环境影响平衡归因面临的挑战:围绕复杂现实传递简单信息的技巧。
Anim Front. 2023 Apr 15;13(2):35-44. doi: 10.1093/af/vfac096. eCollection 2023 Apr.
5
Retrospective and projected warming-equivalent emissions from global livestock and cattle calculated with an alternative climate metric denoted GWP.用替代气候指标 GWP 计算的全球畜牧业和牛类的回溯和预计变暖等效排放量。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 2;18(10):e0288341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288341. eCollection 2023.
6
Economic, social and environmental spillovers decrease the benefits of a global dietary shift.经济、社会和环境溢出效应会降低全球饮食结构转变带来的好处。
Nat Food. 2023 Jun;4(6):496-507. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00769-y. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
展示全球升温潜能值*:一种报告等效升温排放量的方法,该方法体现了短期和长期气候污染物的不同影响。
Environ Res Lett. 2020 Apr 2;15(4):044023. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab6d7e. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
4
Improved calculation of warming-equivalent emissions for short-lived climate pollutants.短寿命气候污染物升温等效排放量的改进计算。
NPJ Clim Atmos Sci. 2019 Sep 4;2(1):29. doi: 10.1038/s41612-019-0086-4.
5
Data for long-term marginal abatement cost curves of non-CO greenhouse gases.非二氧化碳温室气体长期边际减排成本曲线的数据。
Data Brief. 2019 Jul 29;25:104334. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104334. eCollection 2019 Aug.
6
Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.人类世的食物:EAT-柳叶刀可持续食物系统健康饮食委员会
Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):447-492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
7
Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits.在环境限度内保持食物系统的选择。
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7728):519-525. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0594-0. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
8
Methane emissions: choosing the right climate metric and time horizon.甲烷排放:选择正确的气候指标和时间范围。
Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2018 Oct 17;20(10):1323-1339. doi: 10.1039/c8em00414e.
9
Major challenges of integrating agriculture into climate change mitigation policy frameworks.将农业纳入气候变化减缓政策框架的主要挑战。
Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang. 2018;23(3):451-468. doi: 10.1007/s11027-017-9743-2. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
10
Structural change as a key component for agricultural non-CO mitigation efforts.结构变革是农业非二氧化碳减排努力的关键组成部分。
Nat Commun. 2018 Mar 13;9(1):1060. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03489-1.