• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Determinants of intimate partner controlling behavior targeting women in Türkiye.土耳其针对女性的亲密伴侣控制行为的决定因素。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 22;14:1174143. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1174143. eCollection 2023.
2
Intimate partner violence against married and cohabiting women in sub-Saharan Africa: does sexual autonomy matter?撒哈拉以南非洲地区已婚和同居妇女遭受的亲密伴侣暴力:性自主权是否重要?
Reprod Health. 2022 Mar 28;19(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01382-1.
3
Women's income and risk of intimate partner violence: secondary findings from the MAISHA cluster randomised trial in North-Western Tanzania.女性收入与亲密伴侣暴力风险:来自坦桑尼亚西北部 MAISHA 集群随机试验的次要发现。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Aug 14;19(1):1108. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7454-1.
4
Intimate Partner Violence in Tajikistan: Risk and Protective Factors.塔吉克斯坦的亲密伴侣暴力:风险与保护因素
Violence Vict. 2018 Dec;33(6):1124-1147. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.33.6.1124.
5
Economic empowerment and intimate partner violence: a secondary data analysis of the cross-sectional Demographic Health Surveys in Sub-Saharan Africa.经济赋权与亲密伴侣暴力:对撒哈拉以南非洲地区横断面人口健康调查的二次数据分析。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Jun 12;21(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01363-9.
6
Intimate partner violence in pregnancy: a cross-sectional study from post-conflict northern Uganda.孕期亲密伴侣暴力行为:来自乌干达北部冲突后地区的一项横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 26;9(11):e027541. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027541.
7
Men's and women's exposure and perpetration of partner violence: an epidemiological study from Sweden.男性和女性遭受伴侣暴力和实施暴力行为:来自瑞典的一项流行病学研究。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Nov 2;12:945. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-945.
8
Effectiveness of a culturally appropriate intervention to prevent intimate partner violence and HIV transmission among men, women, and couples in rural Ethiopia: Findings from a cluster-randomized controlled trial.文化适宜型干预在埃塞俄比亚农村地区预防男性、女性和夫妻间亲密伴侣暴力和艾滋病毒传播的效果:一项基于群组随机对照试验的研究结果。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 18;17(8):e1003274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003274. eCollection 2020 Aug.
9
Geographic variation and determinants of help seeking behaviour among married women subjected to intimate partner violence: evidence from national population survey.遭受亲密伴侣暴力的已婚妇女寻求帮助行为的地理差异及决定因素:来自全国人口调查的证据
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jan 6;20(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01355-5.
10
Does exposure to interparental violence increase women's risk of intimate partner violence? Evidence from Nigeria demographic and health survey.遭受父母间暴力会增加女性遭受亲密伴侣暴力的风险吗?来自尼日利亚人口与健康调查的证据。
BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2018 Jan 11;18(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12914-018-0143-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing intimate partner controlling behaviour against rural women in South Africa.影响南非农村地区亲密伴侣对妇女实施控制行为的因素。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 16;25(1):2797. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23856-0.
2
Socio-economic determinants of intimate-partner physical violence among women in South Africa.南非女性亲密伴侣身体暴力的社会经济决定因素
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 26;16:1499263. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1499263. eCollection 2025.
3
Effects of couple-based violence prevention education on male partners' knowledge, attitudes and controlling behavior related to intimate partner violence in rural Ethiopia: a cluster randomized controlled trial.基于夫妻的暴力预防教育对埃塞俄比亚农村地区男性伴侣关于亲密伴侣暴力的知识、态度及控制行为的影响:一项整群随机对照试验
Front Public Health. 2025 Mar 10;13:1506459. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1506459. eCollection 2025.
4
Emotional violence within intimate partner violence against Turkish women in rural and urban areas.土耳其城乡地区亲密伴侣暴力行为中的情感暴力对女性的影响
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 25;25(1):774. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22009-7.
5
Comparison of Maternal-Fetal Attachment and Fertility Motivation in Pregnant Women With and Without Experience of Violence: Descriptive and Analytic Study.有暴力经历和无暴力经历孕妇的母婴依恋与生育动机比较:描述性和分析性研究
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 24;8(2):e70512. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70512. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
Measuring domestic violence against Egyptian women and its consequent cost using a latent variable model.使用潜在变量模型衡量针对埃及女性的家庭暴力及其造成的后果成本。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Dec 2;24(1):634. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03465-6.
7
Insights into perceptions, responses, and challenges experienced by women and girls' survivors of sexual violence and their communities in rural Guinea, 2020.2020年几内亚农村地区遭受性暴力的妇女和女童幸存者及其社区的认知、应对措施和面临的挑战洞察
Front Glob Womens Health. 2024 Nov 1;5:1365601. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2024.1365601. eCollection 2024.
8
Society's Attitude Toward Spousal Physical Abuse: Findings from the Philippines National Demographic and Health Survey, 2022.社会对配偶身体虐待的态度:来自2022年菲律宾全国人口与健康调查的结果
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2024 Oct 4;5(1):755-764. doi: 10.1089/whr.2024.0052. eCollection 2024.
9
Gender differences in psychological help-seeking attitudes: a case in Türkiye.寻求心理帮助态度上的性别差异:以土耳其为例。
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 7;15:1289435. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1289435. eCollection 2024.
10
Intimate partner violence among women in Togo: a generalised structural equation modeling approach.多哥女性中的亲密伴侣暴力:一种广义结构方程建模方法。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 19;14(2):e077273. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077273.

本文引用的文献

1
Women's ability to negotiate safer sex with partners by contraceptive status among a nationally representative sample of married women in Nigeria.在尼日利亚全国代表性已婚妇女样本中,按避孕状况划分的女性与伴侣协商安全性行为的能力。
Contracept Reprod Med. 2023 Mar 1;8(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40834-023-00214-2.
2
Verbal and psychological violence against women in Turkey and its determinants.土耳其针对妇女的言语和心理暴力及其决定因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 10;17(10):e0275950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275950. eCollection 2022.
3
Ugandan Men Exposed to Intimate Partner Violence: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Nationally Representative Data.乌干达男性遭受亲密伴侣暴力:全国代表性数据的横断面调查。
J Prev (2022). 2022 Aug;43(4):567-588. doi: 10.1007/s10935-022-00683-2. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
4
Global, regional, and national prevalence estimates of physical or sexual, or both, intimate partner violence against women in 2018.2018 年全球、区域和国家对女性身体或性或两者兼具的亲密伴侣暴力的流行率估计。
Lancet. 2022 Feb 26;399(10327):803-813. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02664-7. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
5
Severity of Lifetime Physical Intimate Partner Violence and Controlling Behavior in Sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲地区一生中经历的严重身体亲密伴侣暴力和控制行为。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2022 Dec;24(6):1508-1516. doi: 10.1007/s10903-022-01336-6. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
6
Predictors of spousal coercive control and its association with intimate partner violence evidence from National Family Health Survey-4 (2015-2016) India.预测配偶强制性控制及其与亲密伴侣暴力证据的关联:来自印度国家家庭健康调查-4(2015-2016 年)的证据。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 29;21(1):2185. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12232-3.
7
Prevalence of spousal violence among married women in a rural area in North Kerala.北喀拉拉邦一个农村地区已婚妇女中配偶暴力的患病率。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2021 Aug;10(8):2845-2852. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2313_20. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
8
Lifetime Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence and Disability: Results From a Population-Based Study in New Zealand.亲密伴侣暴力与残疾的终生患病率:新西兰一项基于人群研究的结果
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Sep;61(3):320-328. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.02.022. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
9
Testing the Effectiveness of Two Psychosocial Interventions on Socio-Cognitive Risk Factors for HIV/AIDS in Mozambican Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.测试两种心理社会干预措施对莫桑比克妇女艾滋病毒/艾滋病社会认知风险因素的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
AIDS Educ Prev. 2021 Jun;33(3):169-186. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2021.33.3.169.
10
Determination of the factors affecting sexual violence against women in Turkey: a population-based analysis.确定影响土耳其妇女遭受性暴力因素的研究:基于人群的分析。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 May 5;21(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01333-1.

土耳其针对女性的亲密伴侣控制行为的决定因素。

Determinants of intimate partner controlling behavior targeting women in Türkiye.

作者信息

Başkan Burak, Alkan Ömer

机构信息

Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Erzurum Technical University, Erzurum, Türkiye.

Department of Econometrics, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 May 22;14:1174143. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1174143. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1174143
PMID:37284474
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10239945/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Intimate partner controlling behavior toward women is an important form of intimate partner violence (IPV), both in terms of limiting women's daily lives and in terms of reproducing patriarchal culture and male dominance in societies at the micro level. A limited number of studies in the literature have identified the male intimate partner's controlling behavior as a dependent variable, which is important for understanding the determinants of this type of IPV. There is also a significant gap in the literature in terms of studies focusing on the case of Türkiye. Thus, the main aim of this study was to determine the socio-demographic, economic and violence-related factors that have an effect on women's status in terms of exposure to control behavior in Türkiye.

METHODS

These factors were examined by using binary logistic regression analysis, based on the micro data set collected by the Hacettepe University's Institute of Population Studies in the 2014-dated National Research on Domestic Violence against Women in Türkiye. A total of 7,462 women between the ages of 15 and 59 were interviewed face-to-face.

RESULTS

The findings of the study revealed that women are more likely to be exposed to controlling behavior if they live in rural areas, are unmarried, speak Turkish as their mother tongue, have bad or very bad health conditions, justify men's violence and are afraid of their intimate partners. As women's age, level of education and income contribution increase, their likelihood of exposure to controlling behavior decreases. However, women's exposure to economic, physical and emotional violence also increases their likelihood of exposure to controlling behavior.

CONCLUSION

The findings highlighted the importance of creating public policies that make women less vulnerable to men's controlling behavior, providing women with methods and mechanisms of resistance and raising public awareness of the exacerbating effects of controlling behavior on social inequalities.

摘要

背景/目的:亲密伴侣对女性的控制行为是亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的一种重要形式,无论是在限制女性日常生活方面,还是在微观层面上,于社会中再现父权文化和男性主导地位方面。文献中数量有限的研究已将男性亲密伴侣的控制行为确定为因变量,这对于理解此类亲密伴侣暴力的决定因素很重要。在关注土耳其情况的研究方面,文献中也存在显著差距。因此,本研究的主要目的是确定在土耳其,就遭受控制行为而言,对女性地位产生影响的社会人口、经济和与暴力相关的因素。

方法

基于哈杰泰佩大学人口研究所于2014年进行的土耳其全国妇女家庭暴力研究收集的微观数据集,通过二元逻辑回归分析来研究这些因素。总共对7462名年龄在15至59岁之间的女性进行了面对面访谈。

结果

研究结果显示,如果女性生活在农村地区、未婚、以土耳其语为母语、健康状况差或非常差、为男性暴力行为辩解且害怕其亲密伴侣,那么她们更有可能遭受控制行为。随着女性年龄、教育水平和收入贡献的增加,她们遭受控制行为的可能性会降低。然而,女性遭受经济、身体和情感暴力也会增加她们遭受控制行为的可能性。

结论

研究结果凸显了制定公共政策的重要性,这些政策应使女性更不易受到男性控制行为的影响,为女性提供抵抗方法和机制,并提高公众对控制行为对社会不平等加剧影响的认识。