• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

更多的推文,更多的投票:社交媒体作为政治行为的量化指标。

More tweets, more votes: social media as a quantitative indicator of political behavior.

机构信息

Department of Sociology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Nov 27;8(11):e79449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079449. eCollection 2013.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0079449
PMID:24312181
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3842288/
Abstract

Is social media a valid indicator of political behavior? There is considerable debate about the validity of data extracted from social media for studying offline behavior. To address this issue, we show that there is a statistically significant association between tweets that mention a candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives and his or her subsequent electoral performance. We demonstrate this result with an analysis of 542,969 tweets mentioning candidates selected from a random sample of 3,570,054,618, as well as Federal Election Commission data from 795 competitive races in the 2010 and 2012 U.S. congressional elections. This finding persists even when controlling for incumbency, district partisanship, media coverage of the race, time, and demographic variables such as the district's racial and gender composition. Our findings show that reliable data about political behavior can be extracted from social media.

摘要

社交媒体是政治行为的有效指标吗?对于从社交媒体提取的数据用于研究线下行为的有效性,存在相当大的争议。为了解决这个问题,我们表明,在提到美国众议院候选人的推文和他或她随后的选举表现之间存在统计学上显著的关联。我们通过对从 3570054618 条随机抽样的提到候选人的 542969 条推文进行分析,并结合 2010 年和 2012 年美国国会选举中 795 场竞争激烈的联邦选举委员会数据,证明了这一结果。即使在控制了现任、地区党派、竞选报道、时间以及地区种族和性别构成等人口统计变量的情况下,这一发现仍然存在。我们的研究结果表明,可以从社交媒体中提取可靠的政治行为数据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8cd/3842288/4c213857fb14/pone.0079449.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8cd/3842288/108db2d56178/pone.0079449.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8cd/3842288/5d9e944c3f0a/pone.0079449.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8cd/3842288/4c213857fb14/pone.0079449.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8cd/3842288/108db2d56178/pone.0079449.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8cd/3842288/5d9e944c3f0a/pone.0079449.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8cd/3842288/4c213857fb14/pone.0079449.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
More tweets, more votes: social media as a quantitative indicator of political behavior.更多的推文,更多的投票:社交媒体作为政治行为的量化指标。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 27;8(11):e79449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079449. eCollection 2013.
2
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
3
Hashtags as signals of political identity: #BlackLivesMatter and #AllLivesMatter.标签作为政治身份的信号:#BlackLivesMatter(黑人的命也是命)和#AllLivesMatter(所有人的命都是命)。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 8;18(6):e0286524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286524. eCollection 2023.
4
Ideological Consumerism in Colombian Elections, 2015: Links Between Political Ideology, Twitter Activity, and Electoral Results.2015年哥伦比亚选举中的意识形态消费主义:政治意识形态、推特活动与选举结果之间的联系
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017 Jan;20(1):37-43. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2016.0402.
5
280 characters to the White House: predicting 2020 U.S. presidential elections from twitter data.致白宫的280个字符:通过推特数据预测2020年美国总统大选
Comput Math Organ Theory. 2023 Mar 28:1-28. doi: 10.1007/s10588-023-09376-5.
6
Abortion and the 1978 Congressional elections.堕胎与1978年国会选举。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1980 Sep-Oct;12(5):238-46.
7
A comparative framework to analyze convergence on Twitter electoral conversations.分析 Twitter 选举对话趋同的比较框架。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 9;12(1):19062. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21861-6.
8
Misinformation and the US Ebola communication crisis: analyzing the veracity and content of social media messages related to a fear-inducing infectious disease outbreak.错误信息与美国埃博拉疫情传播危机:分析与引发恐慌的传染病爆发相关的社交媒体信息的真实性和内容
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 7;20(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08697-3.
9
Social media's contribution to political misperceptions in U.S. Presidential elections.社交媒体对美国总统选举中政治误解的贡献。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 27;14(3):e0213500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213500. eCollection 2019.
10
Social media analysis during political turbulence.政治动荡期间的社交媒体分析。
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 31;12(10):e0186836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186836. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Dataset of keywords used by European political parties on Facebook.欧洲政党在脸书上使用的关键词数据集。
Data Brief. 2025 Jan 10;58:111280. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2025.111280. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Fluctuations and extreme events in the public attention on Italian legislative elections.意大利立法选举中公众关注度的波动和极端事件。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 1;14(1):22804. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69354-y.
3
First public dataset to study 2023 Turkish general election.首个用于研究2023年土耳其大选的公开数据集。

本文引用的文献

1
Temporal patterns of happiness and information in a global social network: hedonometrics and Twitter.全球社交网络中的快乐和信息的时间模式:快乐计量学和 Twitter。
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e26752. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026752. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
2
Diurnal and seasonal mood vary with work, sleep, and daylength across diverse cultures.在不同的文化中,昼夜节律和季节性情绪会随工作、睡眠和日照时间的变化而变化。
Science. 2011 Sep 30;333(6051):1878-81. doi: 10.1126/science.1202775.
3
Predicting the behavior of techno-social systems.预测技术社会系统的行为。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 16;14(1):8794. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58006-w.
4
Do National Service Programs Improve Subjective Well-Being in Communities?国家服务计划能否提升社区中的主观幸福感?
Am Rev Public Adm. 2019 Apr;49(3):275-291. doi: 10.1177/0275074018814883. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
5
Estimating ideology and polarization in European countries using Facebook data.利用脸书数据估算欧洲国家的意识形态和两极分化情况。
EPJ Data Sci. 2022;11(1):56. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00367-1. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
6
How Twitter data sampling biases U.S. voter behavior characterizations.推特数据采样如何使对美国选民行为的描述产生偏差。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2022 Jul 1;8:e1025. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1025. eCollection 2022.
7
Forecasting elections with agent-based modeling: Two live experiments.基于代理的建模预测选举:两项实时实验。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 30;17(6):e0270194. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270194. eCollection 2022.
8
Nonprofits: A Public Policy Tool for the Promotion of Community Subjective Well-being.非营利组织:促进社区主观幸福感的公共政策工具。
J Public Adm Res Theory. 2021 May 17;31(4):822-838. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muab010. eCollection 2021 Oct.
9
Ratioing the President: An exploration of public engagement with Obama and Trump on Twitter.总统比例:公众在 Twitter 上与奥巴马和特朗普的互动探讨。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 14;16(4):e0248880. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248880. eCollection 2021.
10
Using sentiment analysis to predict opinion inversion in Tweets of political communication.使用情感分析预测政治传播推文的观点反转。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 31;11(1):7250. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86510-w.
Science. 2009 Jul 24;325(5939):425-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1171990.
4
Social science. Computational social science.社会科学。计算社会科学。
Science. 2009 Feb 6;323(5915):721-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1167742.
5
The scientific research potential of virtual worlds.虚拟世界的科研潜力。
Science. 2007 Jul 27;317(5837):472-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1146930.