• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种应对疫情中供应链重构及连锁反应分析的动态方法。

A dynamic approach to supply chain reconfiguration and ripple effect analysis in an epidemic.

作者信息

Brusset Xavier, Ivanov Dmitry, Jebali Aida, La Torre Davide, Repetto Marco

机构信息

SKEMA Business School, Université Côte d'Azur, Paris, France.

Berlin School of Economics and Law, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Prod Econ. 2023 Sep;263:108935. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108935. Epub 2023 Jun 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108935
PMID:37337512
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10269373/
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has illustrated the unprecedented challenges of ensuring the continuity of operations in a supply chain as suppliers' and their suppliers stop producing due the spread of infection, leading to a degradation of downstream customer service levels in a ripple effect. In this paper, we contextualize a dynamic approach and propose an optimal control model for supply chain reconfiguration and ripple effect analysis integrated with an epidemic dynamics model. We provide supply chain managers with the optimal choice over a planning horizon among subsets of interchangeable suppliers and corresponding orders; this will maximize demand satisfaction given their prices, lead times, exposure to infection, and upstream suppliers' risk exposure. Numerical illustrations show that our prescriptive forward-looking model can help reconfigure a supply chain and mitigate the ripple effect due to reduced production because of suppliers' infected workers. A risk aversion factor incorporates a measure of supplier risk exposure at the upstream echelons. We examine three scenarios: (a) infection limits the capacity of suppliers, (b) the pandemic recedes but not at the same pace for all suppliers, and (c) infection waves affect the capacity of some suppliers, while others are in a recovery phase. We illustrate through a case study how our model can be immediately deployed in manufacturing or retail supply chains since the data are readily accessible from suppliers and health authorities. This work opens new avenues for prescriptive models in operations management and the study of viable supply chains by combining optimal control and epidemiological models.

摘要

新冠疫情凸显了确保供应链运营连续性面临的前所未有的挑战,因为供应商及其供应商因感染传播而停止生产,进而以连锁反应的方式导致下游客户服务水平下降。在本文中,我们将一种动态方法置于具体情境中,并提出了一个用于供应链重新配置和连锁反应分析的最优控制模型,该模型与疫情动态模型相结合。我们为供应链管理者提供在规划期内从可互换供应商子集和相应订单中进行的最优选择;鉴于其价格、交货时间、感染风险以及上游供应商的风险暴露,这将使需求满意度最大化。数值示例表明,我们的规范性前瞻性模型能够帮助重新配置供应链,并减轻因供应商工人感染导致生产减少所引发的连锁反应。一个风险规避因素纳入了对上游层级供应商风险暴露的衡量。我们考察了三种情形:(a) 感染限制了供应商的产能;(b) 疫情消退,但所有供应商的消退速度不同;(c) 感染浪潮影响一些供应商的产能,而其他供应商处于恢复期。我们通过一个案例研究说明了我们的模型如何能够立即应用于制造或零售供应链,因为数据可从供应商和卫生当局轻松获取。这项工作通过结合最优控制和流行病学模型,为运营管理中的规范性模型以及可行供应链的研究开辟了新途径。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa3/10269373/9ea74f6178be/gr9_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa3/10269373/10d36e16be24/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa3/10269373/36a152e3a20e/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa3/10269373/b4352ebd63b4/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa3/10269373/6b8cf8640fe9/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa3/10269373/9ea74f6178be/gr9_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa3/10269373/10d36e16be24/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa3/10269373/36a152e3a20e/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa3/10269373/b4352ebd63b4/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa3/10269373/6b8cf8640fe9/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/baa3/10269373/9ea74f6178be/gr9_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
A dynamic approach to supply chain reconfiguration and ripple effect analysis in an epidemic.一种应对疫情中供应链重构及连锁反应分析的动态方法。
Int J Prod Econ. 2023 Sep;263:108935. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108935. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
2
Production optimization in the time of pandemic: an SIS-based optimal control model with protection effort and cost minimization.疫情期间的生产优化:一个基于SIS的具有防护努力和成本最小化的最优控制模型。
Ann Oper Res. 2023 Jan 31:1-24. doi: 10.1007/s10479-023-05206-8.
3
The Effect of a Supplier's Eco-Design on the Economic Benefits of a Supply Chain and Associated Coordination.供应商生态设计对供应链经济效益及相关协调的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 18;18(24):13357. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413357.
4
A game-theoretic approach to designing an optimal code of conduct program to promote supplier sustainability in a supply chain.一种用于设计最优行为准则计划以促进供应链中供应商可持续性的博弈论方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(25):37748-37764. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-18073-2. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
5
Investigation of the Behavioral Model of Suppliers of Raw Materials for Biological Products with a System Dynamics Approach (Case study: Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute).采用系统动力学方法研究生物制品原材料供应商的行为模型(案例研究:Razi 疫苗和血清研究所)。
Arch Razi Inst. 2022 Jun 30;77(3):1291-1302. doi: 10.22092/ARI.2022.357504.2049. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
Supply network position, digital transformation and innovation performance: Evidence from listed Chinese manufacturing firms.供应链地位、数字化转型与创新绩效:来自中国上市制造企业的证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 15;17(12):e0279133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279133. eCollection 2022.
7
Power relations in global supply chains and the unequal distribution of costs during crises: Abandoning garment suppliers and workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.全球供应链中的权力关系以及危机期间成本的不平等分配:在新冠疫情期间抛弃服装供应商和工人。
Int Labour Rev. 2022 Mar;161(1):59-82. doi: 10.1111/ilr.12337. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
8
Reducing stock-outs of essential tuberculosis medicines: a system dynamics modelling approach to supply chain management.减少基本结核病药物的缺货情况:供应链管理的系统动力学建模方法。
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Oct 1;32(8):1127-1134. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx057.
9
Clustering sustainable suppliers in the plastics industry: A fuzzy equivalence relation approach.聚类可持续供应商在塑料行业:模糊等价关系方法。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Nov 1;345:118811. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118811. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
10
An integrated multi-criteria decision-making approach to optimize the number of leagile-sustainable suppliers in supply chains.一种集成多准则决策方法,用于优化供应链中精益可持续供应商的数量。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Sep;29(44):66979-67001. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20214-0. Epub 2022 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Modelling and evaluating wood supply chain resilience factors based on system dynamics.基于系统动力学的木材供应链弹性因素建模与评估
Sci Rep. 2025 May 9;15(1):16207. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00669-0.
2
Supply chain risk transmission monitoring based on graphic evaluation and review technique.基于图形评审技术的供应链风险传递监测
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 26;11(1):e41462. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41462. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Strategies for Managing the Impacts of Disruptions During COVID-19: an Example of Toilet Paper.应对新冠疫情期间干扰影响的策略:以卫生纸为例。
Glob J Flex Syst Manag. 2020;21(3):283-293. doi: 10.1007/s40171-020-00248-4. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
2
Production optimization in the time of pandemic: an SIS-based optimal control model with protection effort and cost minimization.疫情期间的生产优化:一个基于SIS的具有防护努力和成本最小化的最优控制模型。
Ann Oper Res. 2023 Jan 31:1-24. doi: 10.1007/s10479-023-05206-8.
3
Mobility Choices and Strategic Interactions in a Two-Group Macroeconomic-Epidemiological Model.
双群体宏观经济-流行病学模型中的流动性选择与战略互动
Dyn Games Appl. 2022;12(1):110-132. doi: 10.1007/s13235-021-00413-z. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
4
Epidemics and macroeconomic outcomes: Social distancing intensity and duration.流行病与宏观经济结果:社会 distancing强度与持续时间。 (注:这里“social distancing”常见释义为“社交距离” ,但结合语境可能是特定领域术语,若有更准确专业说法,可根据实际调整)
J Math Econ. 2021 Mar;93:102473. doi: 10.1016/j.jmateco.2021.102473. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
5
Fighting against COVID-19: what operations research can help and the sense-and-respond framework.抗击新冠疫情:运筹学的助力及感知与响应框架
Ann Oper Res. 2021 Mar 5:1-17. doi: 10.1007/s10479-021-03973-w.
6
Supply chain game theory network modeling under labor constraints: Applications to the Covid-19 pandemic.劳动力约束下的供应链博弈论网络建模:在新冠疫情中的应用
Eur J Oper Res. 2021 Sep 16;293(3):880-891. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.12.054. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
7
Ripple effect in the supply chain network: Forward and backward disruption propagation, network health and firm vulnerability.供应链网络中的涟漪效应:前向和后向干扰传播、网络健康状况与企业脆弱性。
Eur J Oper Res. 2021 Jun 16;291(3):1117-1131. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.09.053. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
8
OR-methods for coping with the ripple effect in supply chains during COVID-19 pandemic: Managerial insights and research implications.应对新冠疫情期间供应链连锁反应的运营研究方法:管理见解与研究启示
Int J Prod Econ. 2021 Feb;232:107921. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107921. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
9
Forecasting and planning during a pandemic: COVID-19 growth rates, supply chain disruptions, and governmental decisions.大流行期间的预测与规划:新冠疫情的增长率、供应链中断及政府决策
Eur J Oper Res. 2021 Apr 1;290(1):99-115. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
10
Competitive pricing of substitute products under supply disruption.供应中断情况下替代产品的竞争性定价。
Omega. 2021 Jun;101:102279. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2020.102279. Epub 2020 May 19.