School of Human Services, Faculty of Health, Charles Darwin University, Ellengowan Drive, Casuarina, NT, 0810, Australia.
Researchers in Behavioural Addictions, Alcohol and Drugs, Charles Darwin University, Ellengowan Drive, Casuarina, NT, 0810, Australia.
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Jun;40(2):571-585. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10234-x. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
As online gambling becomes more prevalent, understanding the motives of online gamblers has become a key focus for research and practice. The aim of this study was to understand differences in gambling-related outcome expectancies between mixed (both online and offline) gamblers and offline-only gamblers, by incorporating gambling harm risk categories from the problem gambling severity index (PGSI). This study comprised a secondary data analysis of the 2015 Northern Territory Gambling Prevalence and Wellbeing Survey. A sample of 1207 individuals in the Northern Territory who had reported gambling at least once in the previous 12 months were used in the analyses. General linear and structural equation modelling were used to ascertain differences in gambling outcome expectancies, in relation to gambling modality (i.e., mixed, offline-only) and PGSI scores. Mixed gamblers tended to score higher on all outcome expectancies than their offline-only counterparts. Outcome expectancy scores were higher in individuals in higher-risk PGSI categories. The escape outcome expectancy was dependent on both modality and risk category. Invariance testing of a low and problem gambling risk subsample revealed differential relationships for both the escape and excitement outcome expectancies for mixed and offline-only gamblers. The results provide an important contribution to the existing literature regarding motivation and outcome expectancies in relation to gambling modality and problem gambling severity. The findings highlight the importance of considering both gambling outcome expectancies and modality when considering problem gambling.
随着网络赌博的日益普及,了解网络赌客的动机已成为研究和实践的重点。本研究旨在通过纳入赌博问题严重程度指数(PGSI)中的赌博危害风险类别,了解混合(线上和线下)赌客和仅线下赌客之间与赌博相关的预期结果的差异。本研究是对 2015 年北领地赌博流行和幸福感调查的二次数据分析。分析中使用了北领地 1207 名在过去 12 个月内至少有过一次赌博经历的个人样本。采用一般线性和结构方程模型来确定与赌博方式(即混合、仅线下)和 PGSI 得分相关的赌博结果预期的差异。混合赌客的所有结果预期得分均高于仅线下赌客。PGSI 得分较高的个体的结果预期得分更高。逃避结果预期既取决于模式又取决于风险类别。对低风险和问题风险亚样本的不变性检验显示,对于混合和仅线下赌客,逃避和兴奋结果预期都存在不同的关系。研究结果为现有关于与赌博方式和赌博严重程度相关的动机和结果预期的文献提供了重要贡献。研究结果强调了在考虑问题赌博时,既要考虑赌博结果预期,又要考虑赌博方式。