• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于乳腺癌个性化筛查与预防的临床风险模型。

A Clinical Risk Model for Personalized Screening and Prevention of Breast Cancer.

作者信息

Eriksson Mikael, Czene Kamila, Vachon Celine, Conant Emily F, Hall Per

机构信息

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, 171 65 Stockholm, Sweden.

Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB1 8RN, UK.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 19;15(12):3246. doi: 10.3390/cancers15123246.

DOI:10.3390/cancers15123246
PMID:37370856
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10296673/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Image-derived artificial intelligence (AI) risk models have shown promise in identifying high-risk women in the short term. The long-term performance of image-derived risk models expanded with clinical factors has not been investigated.

METHODS

We performed a case-cohort study of 8110 women aged 40-74 randomly selected from a Swedish mammography screening cohort initiated in 2010 together with 1661 incident BCs diagnosed before January 2022. The imaging-only AI risk model extracted mammographic features and age at screening. Additional lifestyle/familial risk factors were incorporated into the lifestyle/familial-expanded AI model. Absolute risks were calculated using the two models and the clinical Tyrer-Cuzick v8 model. Age-adjusted model performances were compared across the 10-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The AUCs of the lifestyle/familial-expanded AI risk model ranged from 0.75 (95%CI: 0.70-0.80) to 0.68 (95%CI: 0.66-0.69) 1-10 years after study entry. Corresponding AUCs were 0.72 (95%CI: 0.66-0.78) to 0.65 (95%CI: 0.63-0.66) for the imaging-only model and 0.62 (95%CI: 0.55-0.68) to 0.60 (95%CI: 0.58-0.61) for Tyrer-Cuzick v8. The increased performances were observed in multiple risk subgroups and cancer subtypes. Among the 5% of women at highest risk, the PPV was 5.8% using the lifestyle/familial-expanded model compared with 5.3% using the imaging-only model, < 0.01, and 4.6% for Tyrer-Cuzick, < 0.01.

CONCLUSIONS

The lifestyle/familial-expanded AI risk model showed higher performance for both long-term and short-term risk assessment compared with imaging-only and Tyrer-Cuzick models.

摘要

背景

基于图像的人工智能(AI)风险模型在短期内识别高风险女性方面已显示出前景。尚未对结合临床因素的基于图像的风险模型的长期性能进行研究。

方法

我们对2010年启动的瑞典乳腺X线筛查队列中随机选取的8110名40 - 74岁女性以及2022年1月前诊断出的1661例新发乳腺癌进行了病例队列研究。仅基于影像的AI风险模型提取了乳腺X线特征和筛查时的年龄。其他生活方式/家族风险因素被纳入生活方式/家族扩展AI模型。使用这两种模型以及临床Tyrer-Cuzick v8模型计算绝对风险。在10年随访期间比较了年龄调整后的模型性能。

结果

在研究入组后1 - 10年,生活方式/家族扩展AI风险模型的AUC范围为0.75(95%CI:0.70 - 0.80)至0.68(95%CI:0.66 - 0.69)。仅基于影像模型的相应AUC为0.72(95%CI:0.66 - 0.78)至0.65(95%CI:0.63 - 0.66),Tyrer-Cuzick v8模型为0.62(95%CI:0.55 - 0.68)至0.60(95%CI:0.58 - 0.61)。在多个风险亚组和癌症亚型中观察到性能有所提高。在风险最高的5%女性中,使用生活方式/家族扩展模型的阳性预测值为5.8%,仅基于影像模型为5.3%,P < 0.01,Tyrer-Cuzick模型为4.6%,P < 0.01。

结论

与仅基于影像和Tyrer-Cuzick模型相比,生活方式/家族扩展AI风险模型在长期和短期风险评估中均表现出更高的性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b1/10296673/cfe7a5f69162/cancers-15-03246-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b1/10296673/525f1ed0b067/cancers-15-03246-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b1/10296673/a55029713bca/cancers-15-03246-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b1/10296673/3841af54b287/cancers-15-03246-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b1/10296673/76bb69433db3/cancers-15-03246-g0A4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b1/10296673/0b8525d99d92/cancers-15-03246-g0A5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b1/10296673/77cb5829c6a8/cancers-15-03246-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b1/10296673/e644c214d6f3/cancers-15-03246-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b1/10296673/7f41ff74c489/cancers-15-03246-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b1/10296673/cfe7a5f69162/cancers-15-03246-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b1/10296673/525f1ed0b067/cancers-15-03246-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b1/10296673/a55029713bca/cancers-15-03246-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b1/10296673/3841af54b287/cancers-15-03246-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b1/10296673/76bb69433db3/cancers-15-03246-g0A4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b1/10296673/0b8525d99d92/cancers-15-03246-g0A5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b1/10296673/77cb5829c6a8/cancers-15-03246-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b1/10296673/e644c214d6f3/cancers-15-03246-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b1/10296673/7f41ff74c489/cancers-15-03246-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/57b1/10296673/cfe7a5f69162/cancers-15-03246-g004a.jpg

相似文献

1
A Clinical Risk Model for Personalized Screening and Prevention of Breast Cancer.一种用于乳腺癌个性化筛查与预防的临床风险模型。
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jun 19;15(12):3246. doi: 10.3390/cancers15123246.
2
Long-Term Performance of an Image-Based Short-Term Risk Model for Breast Cancer.基于影像的乳腺癌短期风险模型的长期性能。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 May 10;41(14):2536-2545. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01564. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
3
Long-term Accuracy of Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Combining Classic Risk Factors and Breast Density.经典风险因素与乳腺密度相结合的乳腺癌风险评估的长期准确性。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Sep 1;4(9):e180174. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0174. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
4
European validation of an image-derived AI-based short-term risk model for individualized breast cancer screening-a nested case-control study.基于图像的人工智能短期风险模型用于个体化乳腺癌筛查的欧洲验证——一项巢式病例对照研究
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Dec 6;37:100798. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100798. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
Mammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohort.在英国一个前瞻性筛查队列中,乳腺X线密度提高了泰勒-库齐克模型和盖尔乳腺癌风险模型的准确性。
Breast Cancer Res. 2015 Dec 1;17(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0653-5.
6
Performance of the IBIS/Tyrer-Cuzick model of breast cancer risk by race and ethnicity in the Women's Health Initiative.IBIS/Tyrer-Cuzick 乳腺癌风险模型在妇女健康倡议中的种族和民族表现。
Cancer. 2021 Oct 15;127(20):3742-3750. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33767. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
7
Artificial Intelligence-Powered Imaging Biomarker Based on Mammography for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.基于乳腺X线摄影的人工智能成像生物标志物用于乳腺癌风险预测。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jun 7;14(12):1212. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14121212.
8
A Case-Control Study to Add Volumetric or Clinical Mammographic Density into the Tyrer-Cuzick Breast Cancer Risk Model.一项将体积性或临床乳腺钼靶密度纳入泰勒-库齐克乳腺癌风险模型的病例对照研究。
J Breast Imaging. 2019 Jun;1(2):99-106. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbz006. Epub 2019 May 11.
9
Use of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve Analysis for Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail in Breast Cancer Screening in Jiangxi Province, China.应用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析 Tyrer-Cuzick 和 Gail 在江西省乳腺癌筛查中的应用。
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Aug 9;24:5528-5532. doi: 10.12659/MSM.910108.
10
Evaluation of the Tyrer-Cuzick (International Breast Cancer Intervention Study) model for breast cancer risk prediction in women with atypical hyperplasia.评估 Tyrer-Cuzick(国际乳腺癌干预研究)模型在不典型增生女性中的乳腺癌风险预测能力。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Aug 1;28(22):3591-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.28.0784. Epub 2010 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
AI's ongoing impact: Implications of AI's effects on health equity for women's healthcare providers.人工智能的持续影响:人工智能对女性医疗保健提供者的健康公平性影响的含义。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2025 Apr 9;49:e19. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2025.19. eCollection 2025.
2
Artificial Intelligence Algorithm for Subclinical Breast Cancer Detection.人工智能算法用于早期乳腺癌检测。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2437402. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.37402.
3
European validation of an image-derived AI-based short-term risk model for individualized breast cancer screening-a nested case-control study.

本文引用的文献

1
Prospective validation of the BOADICEA multifactorial breast cancer risk prediction model in a large prospective cohort study.前瞻性验证 BOADICEA 多因素乳腺癌风险预测模型在大型前瞻性队列研究中的应用。
J Med Genet. 2022 Dec;59(12):1196-1205. doi: 10.1136/jmg-2022-108806. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
2
A risk model for digital breast tomosynthesis to predict breast cancer and guide clinical care.一种用于数字乳腺断层合成的风险模型,以预测乳腺癌并指导临床护理。
Sci Transl Med. 2022 May 11;14(644):eabn3971. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abn3971.
3
Feasibility of personalized screening and prevention recommendations in the general population through breast cancer risk assessment: results from a dedicated risk clinic.
基于图像的人工智能短期风险模型用于个体化乳腺癌筛查的欧洲验证——一项巢式病例对照研究
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023 Dec 6;37:100798. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100798. eCollection 2024 Feb.
通过乳腺癌风险评估在普通人群中进行个性化筛查和预防建议的可行性:来自专门风险诊所的结果。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Apr;192(2):375-383. doi: 10.1007/s10549-021-06445-8. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
4
Distribution of Estimated Lifetime Breast Cancer Risk Among Women Undergoing Screening Mammography.接受筛查性乳房 X 光检查的女性预估终生乳腺癌风险分布。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Jul;217(1):48-55. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.23333. Epub 2021 May 12.
5
Toward robust mammography-based models for breast cancer risk.致力于基于乳腺 X 线摄影的乳腺癌风险稳健模型。
Sci Transl Med. 2021 Jan 27;13(578). doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aba4373.
6
Identification of Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer Who Need Supplemental Screening.识别需要补充筛查的乳腺癌高危女性。
Radiology. 2020 Nov;297(2):327-333. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020201620. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
7
Key steps for effective breast cancer prevention.有效预防乳腺癌的关键步骤。
Nat Rev Cancer. 2020 Aug;20(8):417-436. doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-0266-x. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
8
Trends of female and male breast cancer incidence at the global, regional, and national levels, 1990-2017.全球、区域和国家层面 1990-2017 年女性和男性乳腺癌发病趋势。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Apr;180(2):481-490. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05561-1. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
9
International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening.国际乳腺癌筛查人工智能系统评估。
Nature. 2020 Jan;577(7788):89-94. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
10
A systematic review and quality assessment of individualised breast cancer risk prediction models.系统评价和个体化乳腺癌风险预测模型的质量评估。
Br J Cancer. 2019 Jul;121(1):76-85. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0476-8. Epub 2019 May 22.