Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Imperial College London, London, W2 1PG, UK.
Department of Cardiology, Ealing Hospital, London North West University Healthcare NHS Trust, Middlesex, UB1 3HW, UK.
BMC Med Genomics. 2023 Jun 30;16(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12920-023-01584-x.
COVID-19 manifests with huge heterogeneity in susceptibility and severity outcomes. UK Black Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) groups have demonstrated disproportionate burdens. Some variability remains unexplained, suggesting potential genetic contribution. Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) can determine genetic predisposition to disease based on Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) within the genome. COVID-19 PRS analyses within non-European samples are extremely limited. We applied a multi-ethnic PRS to a UK-based cohort to understand genetic contribution to COVID-19 variability.
We constructed two PRS for susceptibility and severity outcomes based on leading risk-variants from the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative. Scores were applied to 447,382 participants from the UK-Biobank. Associations with COVID-19 outcomes were assessed using binary logistic regression and discriminative power was validated using incremental area under receiver operating curve (ΔAUC). Variance explained was compared between ethnic groups via incremental pseudo-R (ΔR).
Compared to those at low genetic risk, those at high risk had a significantly greater risk of severe COVID-19 for White (odds ratio [OR] 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-1.74), Asian (OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.63-5.09) and Black (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.11-3.53) ethnic groups. Severity PRS performed best within Asian (ΔAUC 0.9%, ΔR 0.98%) and Black (ΔAUC 0.6%, ΔR 0.61%) cohorts. For susceptibility, higher genetic risk was significantly associated with COVID-19 infection risk for the White cohort (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.26-1.36), but not for Black or Asian groups.
Significant associations between PRS and COVID-19 outcomes were elicited, establishing a genetic basis for variability in COVID-19. PRS showed utility in identifying high-risk individuals. The multi-ethnic approach allowed applicability of PRS to diverse populations, with the severity model performing well within Black and Asian cohorts. Further studies with larger sample sizes of non-White samples are required to increase statistical power and better assess impacts within BAME populations.
COVID-19 在易感性和严重程度结果方面表现出巨大的异质性。英国的黑人、亚洲人和少数民族(BAME)群体承担了不成比例的负担。一些可变性仍然无法解释,表明可能存在遗传贡献。多基因风险评分(PRS)可以根据基因组内的单核苷酸多态性(SNP)来确定疾病的遗传易感性。在非欧洲样本中,COVID-19 的 PRS 分析极为有限。我们在一个基于英国的队列中应用了一种多民族 PRS,以了解 COVID-19 变异性的遗传贡献。
我们基于 COVID-19 宿主遗传学倡议的主要风险变异,构建了两种用于易感性和严重程度结局的 PRS。评分应用于来自英国生物库的 447382 名参与者。使用二元逻辑回归评估 COVID-19 结局的相关性,并使用增量接收者操作特征曲线下面积(ΔAUC)验证判别力。通过增量伪 R(ΔR)比较不同种族群体的方差解释。
与低遗传风险者相比,高遗传风险者患严重 COVID-19 的风险显著增加,白人(比值比 [OR] 1.57,95%置信区间 [CI] 1.42-1.74)、亚洲人(OR 2.88,95% CI 1.63-5.09)和黑人(OR 1.98,95% CI 1.11-3.53)。严重程度 PRS 在亚洲人(ΔAUC 0.9%,ΔR 0.98%)和黑人(ΔAUC 0.6%,ΔR 0.61%)队列中表现最佳。对于易感性,较高的遗传风险与白人队列的 COVID-19 感染风险显著相关(OR 1.31,95% CI 1.26-1.36),但与黑人或亚洲人群无关。
PRs 与 COVID-19 结局之间存在显著关联,为 COVID-19 的变异性建立了遗传基础。PRS 显示出识别高危个体的效用。多民族方法允许 PRS 适用于不同的人群,严重程度模型在黑人和亚洲人群中表现良好。需要更大的非白人样本量的进一步研究来提高统计能力,并更好地评估 BAME 人群中的影响。