• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

益生菌对低收入和中等收入国家极低出生体重早产儿死亡率和败血症的预防作用:一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析

Probiotics for the prevention of mortality and sepsis in preterm very low birth weight neonates from low- and middle-income countries: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Thomas Deena, Sharma Akash, Sankar M Jeeva

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Muthoot Hospitals, Kozhencherry, Kerala, India.

Department of Pediatrics, Sir Padampat Institute of Neonatology and Pediatric Health (SPINPH), SMS Medical College, Jaipur, India.

出版信息

Front Nutr. 2023 Jun 14;10:1133293. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1133293. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fnut.2023.1133293
PMID:37388635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10300419/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Probiotics have been shown to reduce the risk of mortality and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates. The probiotic species with the maximal benefits in neonates from low- and middle-income countries are unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the strain of probiotics with the maximum benefit in preventing neonatal mortality, sepsis, and NEC using the Bayesian network meta-analysis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Medline via PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). We also hand-searched reference lists of previous systematic reviews to identify eligible studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from LMICs comparing enteral supplementation of one or more probiotics with another probiotic species or placebo were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors screened the studies, extracted the data, and examined the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk of bias 2 (RoB 2) tools. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed using the "BUGSnet" package in R and RStudio (version 1.4.1103). The confidence in the findings was assessed using the Confidence in Network Meta-analysis (CINeMA) web application.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine RCTs enrolling 4,906 neonates and evaluating 24 probiotics were included. Only 11 (38%) studies had a low risk of bias. All the studies compared the probiotics with a placebo; none had a head-to-head comparison of different probiotic species. Also, only one study each had evaluated most probiotic regimens. When compared to placebo, the combination of , and may reduce the risk of mortality (relative risk [RR] 0.26; 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.07 to 0.72), sepsis (RR 0.47; 95% CrI 0.25 to 0.83), and NEC (RR 0.31; 95% CrI 0.10 to 0.78) but the evidence is very uncertain. There is low certainty evidence that the single probiotic species, , could reduce the risk of mortality (RR 0.21; 0.05 to 0.66) and NEC (RR 0.09; 0.01 to 0.32).

CONCLUSION

Given the low to very low certainty of evidence for the efficacy of the two probiotics found to reduce mortality and necrotizing enterocolitis, no firm conclusions can be made on the optimal probiotics for use in preterm neonates in low- and middle-income countries.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022353242, identifier: CRD42022353242.

摘要

背景

已证明益生菌可降低极低出生体重(VLBW)新生儿的死亡率和坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)风险。在低收入和中等收入国家的新生儿中,具有最大益处的益生菌种类尚不清楚。

目的

使用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析确定在预防新生儿死亡、败血症和NEC方面具有最大益处的益生菌菌株。

检索方法

我们通过PubMed、Embase和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)检索了Medline。我们还手工检索了先前系统评价的参考文献列表,以确定符合条件的研究。

入选标准

纳入来自低收入和中等收入国家的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验比较了一种或多种益生菌与另一种益生菌或安慰剂的肠内补充情况。

数据收集与分析

两位作者筛选了研究,提取了数据,并使用Cochrane偏倚风险2(RoB 2)工具检查了偏倚风险。使用R和RStudio(版本1.4.1103)中的“BUGSnet”软件包进行贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。使用网络荟萃分析置信度(CINeMA)网络应用程序评估研究结果的可信度。

结果

纳入了29项RCT,共4906名新生儿,评估了24种益生菌。只有11项(38%)研究的偏倚风险较低。所有研究均将益生菌与安慰剂进行了比较;没有对不同益生菌种类进行直接比较。此外,每种益生菌方案大多仅在一项研究中进行了评估。与安慰剂相比,[具体益生菌种类1]、[具体益生菌种类2]和[具体益生菌种类3]的组合可能会降低死亡率(相对风险[RR] 0.26;95%可信区间[CrI] 0.07至0.72)、败血症(RR 0.47;95% CrI 0.25至0.83)和NEC(RR 0.31;95% CrI 0.10至0.78)的风险,但证据非常不确定。有低确定性证据表明单一益生菌种类[具体益生菌种类4]可降低死亡率(RR 0.21;0.05至0.66)和NEC(RR 0.09;0.01至0.32)的风险。

结论

鉴于所发现的两种益生菌降低死亡率和坏死性小肠结肠炎疗效的证据确定性低至极低,对于低收入和中等收入国家早产儿使用的最佳益生菌无法得出确切结论。

系统评价注册

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022353242,标识符:CRD42022353242。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c41e/10300419/2a2ebdc324f7/fnut-10-1133293-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c41e/10300419/cbabd906268c/fnut-10-1133293-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c41e/10300419/524e01a5addb/fnut-10-1133293-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c41e/10300419/8f436590bd3f/fnut-10-1133293-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c41e/10300419/2a2ebdc324f7/fnut-10-1133293-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c41e/10300419/cbabd906268c/fnut-10-1133293-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c41e/10300419/524e01a5addb/fnut-10-1133293-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c41e/10300419/8f436590bd3f/fnut-10-1133293-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c41e/10300419/2a2ebdc324f7/fnut-10-1133293-g0004.jpg

相似文献

1
Probiotics for the prevention of mortality and sepsis in preterm very low birth weight neonates from low- and middle-income countries: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.益生菌对低收入和中等收入国家极低出生体重早产儿死亡率和败血症的预防作用:一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析
Front Nutr. 2023 Jun 14;10:1133293. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1133293. eCollection 2023.
2
Maternal probiotic supplementation for prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants.孕期补充益生菌预防早产儿发病和死亡
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 12;12(12):CD012519. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012519.pub2.
3
Effects of neonatal nutrition interventions on neonatal mortality and child health and development outcomes: A systematic review.新生儿营养干预对新生儿死亡率及儿童健康与发育结局的影响:一项系统评价
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 5;17(1):e1141. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1141. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Enteral lactoferrin supplementation for prevention of sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants.肠内补充乳铁蛋白预防早产儿败血症和坏死性小肠结肠炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 31;3(3):CD007137. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007137.pub6.
6
Probiotics to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very preterm or very low birth weight infants.益生菌预防极早产儿或极低出生体重儿坏死性小肠结肠炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 15;10(10):CD005496. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005496.pub5.
7
Enteral lactoferrin supplementation for prevention of sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants.肠内补充乳铁蛋白预防早产儿败血症和坏死性小肠结肠炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 28;6(6):CD007137. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007137.pub5.
8
Benefits of probiotics in preterm neonates in low-income and medium-income countries: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.低收入和中等收入国家中益生菌对早产儿的益处:随机对照试验的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 7;7(12):e017638. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017638.
9
Probiotics for prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants.益生菌用于预防早产儿坏死性小肠结肠炎
Evid Based Child Health. 2014 Sep;9(3):584-671. doi: 10.1002/ebch.1976.
10
Probiotics to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very preterm or very low birth weight infants.益生菌预防极早产儿或极低出生体重儿坏死性小肠结肠炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 26;7(7):CD005496. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005496.pub6.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing Nutrition in Extremely Low Gestational Age Neonates: An Evidence-Based Protocol.极低出生体重儿营养优化:基于证据的方案
Indian J Pediatr. 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1007/s12098-025-05728-y.
2
Single Strain vs Multiple Strain Probiotics: The Clinician's Choice.单一菌株与多菌株益生菌:临床医生的选择
Cureus. 2025 Jun 19;17(6):e86353. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86353. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Current state of microbiota clinical applications in neonatal and pediatric bacterial infections.新生儿及儿童细菌感染中微生物群临床应用的现状

本文引用的文献

1
CINeMA: Software for semiautomated assessment of the confidence in the results of network meta-analysis.CINeMA:用于半自动评估网络荟萃分析结果可信度的软件。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 11;16(1):e1080. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1080. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
Effect of a Multi-Strain Probiotic on the Incidence and Severity of Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Feeding Intolerances in Preterm Neonates.多菌株益生菌对早产儿坏死性小肠结肠炎和喂养不耐受发生率及严重程度的影响。
Nutrients. 2022 Aug 12;14(16):3305. doi: 10.3390/nu14163305.
3
Maternal gut microbiome-induced IgG regulates neonatal gut microbiome and immunity.
Gut Microbes. 2025 Dec;17(1):2529400. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2025.2529400. Epub 2025 Jul 6.
4
Epidemiology and management of infections in critically ill neonates: findings from a cohort study in a Brazilian neonatal intensive care unit.危重新生儿感染的流行病学与管理:巴西新生儿重症监护病房队列研究的结果
J Med Microbiol. 2025 Mar;74(3). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001968.
5
Effects of probiotic treatment on the prognosis of patients with sepsis: a systematic review.益生菌治疗对脓毒症患者预后的影响:一项系统评价
World J Emerg Med. 2025;16(1):18-27. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2025.018.
6
Prevention and Treatment of Neonatal Infections in Facility and Community Settings of Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Descriptive Review.低收入和中等收入国家医疗机构及社区环境中新生儿感染的预防与治疗:描述性综述
Neonatology. 2025;122(Suppl 1):173-208. doi: 10.1159/000541871. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
7
Global Insights and Key Trends in Gut Microbiota Research for Premature Infants: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study.早产儿肠道微生物群研究的全球洞察与关键趋势:一项文献计量学与可视化研究
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Oct 4;17:4611-4626. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S483332. eCollection 2024.
8
Probiotic effect in preterm neonates with sepsis - A systematic review protocol.益生菌对患有败血症的早产儿的影响——一项系统评价方案。
F1000Res. 2024 Jul 5;11:913. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.122226.3. eCollection 2022.
9
The Role of Diet and Nutritional Interventions for the Infant Gut Microbiome.饮食和营养干预对婴儿肠道微生物组的作用。
Nutrients. 2024 Jan 30;16(3):400. doi: 10.3390/nu16030400.
母体肠道微生物群诱导的 IgG 调节新生儿肠道微生物群和免疫。
Sci Immunol. 2022 Jun 10;7(72):eabh3816. doi: 10.1126/sciimmunol.abh3816.
4
Maternal and infant probiotic administration for morbidity of very low birth weight infants: a three-arm randomized placebo-controlled trial.母亲和婴儿益生菌给药对极低出生体重儿发病率的影响:一项三臂随机安慰剂对照试验。
Eur J Nutr. 2022 Oct;61(7):3637-3648. doi: 10.1007/s00394-022-02905-z. Epub 2022 May 31.
5
Maternal fecal microbiome predicts gestational age, birth weight and neonatal growth in rural Zimbabwe.母体粪便微生物组可预测津巴布韦农村地区的妊娠年龄、出生体重和新生儿生长。
EBioMedicine. 2021 Jun;68:103421. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103421. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
6
Immediate "Kangaroo Mother Care" and Survival of Infants with Low Birth Weight.即刻“袋鼠式护理”与低体重儿的生存。
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 27;384(21):2028-2038. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2026486.
7
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
8
Delivery Mode Affects Stability of Early Infant Gut Microbiota.分娩方式影响婴儿早期肠道微生物群的稳定性。
Cell Rep Med. 2020 Dec 22;1(9):100156. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2020.100156.
9
Maternal breastmilk, infant gut microbiome and the impact on preterm infant health.母乳、婴儿肠道微生物群及其对早产儿健康的影响。
Acta Paediatr. 2021 Feb;110(2):450-457. doi: 10.1111/apa.15534. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
10
Antenatal Dexamethasone for Early Preterm Birth in Low-Resource Countries.产前地塞米松治疗资源匮乏国家的早产
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 24;383(26):2514-2525. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022398. Epub 2020 Oct 23.