• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹膜透析患者的体验:系统评价定性证据方案。

The experiences of patients with peritoneal dialysis: A systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jul 19;18(7):e0288724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288724. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0288724
PMID:37467229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10355407/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is on the rise, it has been a major public health problem and places a significant burden on healthcare systems. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an increasingly popular form of renal replacement therapy. Patients undergoing dialysis treatment undergo specific pathophysiological and psychological changes. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the experiences of ESRD patients receiving PD in order to gain deeper insights into their attitudes and beliefs towards this treatment. This will help researchers and health professionals to target interventions to improve the quality of life of PD patients.

DESIGN

Protocol for a qualitative systematic review.

METHODS

This systematic review protocol will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) meta-analysis methodology. We will conduct a comprehensive search, including English and Chinese databases. It will include all published qualitative studies of patients' experiences with PD. Both English and Chinese literature will be covered. Two reviewers will independently participate in the literature selection, document selection, and data extraction process. Synthesis will be carried out through in-depth reading of the original text and subsequent creation of similar categories.

RESULTS

Experiencing is a complex dimension that includes physical, psychological and social aspects. This review will enable nurses to gain a deeper understanding of the feelings and beliefs of patients with PD. Our findings will provide healthcare professionals and policy makers with evidence to provide better care for patients with PD.

摘要

背景

终末期肾病(ESRD)的发病率呈上升趋势,已成为一个主要的公共卫生问题,并给医疗系统带来了巨大的负担。腹膜透析(PD)是一种越来越受欢迎的肾脏替代治疗方法。接受透析治疗的患者会经历特定的生理和心理变化。本系统评价的目的是研究接受 PD 的 ESRD 患者的经验,以便更深入地了解他们对这种治疗的态度和信念。这将有助于研究人员和卫生专业人员针对干预措施,以提高 PD 患者的生活质量。

设计

定性系统评价方案。

方法

本系统评价方案将遵循乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)的荟萃分析方法。我们将进行全面的搜索,包括英文和中文数据库。它将包括所有关于患者 PD 经验的已发表的定性研究。涵盖英文和中文文献。两名评审员将独立参与文献选择、文献选择和数据提取过程。综合将通过深入阅读原文和随后创建相似类别来进行。

结果

体验是一个复杂的维度,包括身体、心理和社会方面。本综述将使护士能够更深入地了解 PD 患者的感受和信念。我们的研究结果将为医疗保健专业人员和政策制定者提供证据,为 PD 患者提供更好的护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27f7/10355407/d37f01695300/pone.0288724.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27f7/10355407/63efa104194f/pone.0288724.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27f7/10355407/fd7b0658e80d/pone.0288724.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27f7/10355407/d37f01695300/pone.0288724.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27f7/10355407/63efa104194f/pone.0288724.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27f7/10355407/fd7b0658e80d/pone.0288724.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/27f7/10355407/d37f01695300/pone.0288724.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The experiences of patients with peritoneal dialysis: A systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.腹膜透析患者的体验:系统评价定性证据方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 19;18(7):e0288724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288724. eCollection 2023.
2
The experiences of adults who are on dialysis and waiting for a renal transplant from a deceased donor: a systematic review.接受透析治疗并等待已故捐赠者肾脏移植的成年人的经历:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Mar 12;13(2):169-211. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1973.
3
The role of icodextrin in peritoneal dialysis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.艾考糊精在腹膜透析中的作用:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 30;8(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-0959-y.
4
Barriers and facilitators for the adoption of peritoneal dialysis: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative studies.采用腹膜透析的障碍和促进因素:系统评价定性研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 18;14(10):e091928. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091928.
5
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
Association of incident dialysis modality with mortality: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies.透析起始模式与死亡率的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析随机对照试验及队列研究的方案
Syst Rev. 2019 Feb 19;8(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-0972-1.
10
Experiences of pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.孕妇妊娠糖尿病体验的系统评价:定性证据方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 18;10(2):e034126. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034126.

引用本文的文献

1
Bridging the gap: summative content analysis of understanding barriers in elderly patient education from nurses' perspectives.弥合差距:从护士视角对老年患者教育中理解障碍的总结性内容分析
BMC Nurs. 2025 May 12;24(1):509. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03118-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Frailty and chronic kidney disease: current evidence and continuing uncertainties.衰弱与慢性肾脏病:当前证据及持续存在的不确定性
Clin Kidney J. 2018 Apr;11(2):236-245. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfx134. Epub 2017 Dec 2.
2
Global kidney health 2017 and beyond: a roadmap for closing gaps in care, research, and policy.全球肾脏健康 2017 及以后:缩小照护、研究和政策差距的路线图。
Lancet. 2017 Oct 21;390(10105):1888-1917. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30788-2. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
3
Changes in the worldwide epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis.腹膜透析的全球流行病学变化。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017 Feb;13(2):90-103. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2016.181. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
4
Qualitative research synthesis: methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation.定性研究综合:利用元聚合的系统评价者的方法学指南。
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):179-87. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062.
5
Establishing confidence in the output of qualitative research synthesis: the ConQual approach.建立对定性研究综合结果的信心:ConQual方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Sep 20;14:108. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-108.
6
Educational interventions in peritoneal dialysis: a narrative review of the literature.腹膜透析的教育干预措施:文献综述
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Apr;52(4):882-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.12.009. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
7
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
8
Evaluating the benefits of home-based peritoneal dialysis.评估家庭腹膜透析的益处。
Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2014 Dec 4;7:447-55. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S50527. eCollection 2014.
9
The psychosocial experience of patients with end-stage renal disease and its impact on quality of life: findings from a needs assessment to shape a service.终末期肾病患者的心理社会体验及其对生活质量的影响:一项为规划服务而进行的需求评估结果
ISRN Nephrol. 2012 Oct 21;2013:308986. doi: 10.5402/2013/308986. eCollection 2013.
10
Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives.慢性肾脏病:全球维度与展望。
Lancet. 2013 Jul 20;382(9888):260-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60687-X. Epub 2013 May 31.