• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于电子健康记录数据的机器学习因果概率网络算法预测脓毒症发病。

Predicting sepsis onset using a machine learned causal probabilistic network algorithm based on electronic health records data.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 20;13(1):11760. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38858-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-38858-4
PMID:37474597
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10359402/
Abstract

Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality and early identification improves survival. With increasing digitalization of health care data automated sepsis prediction models hold promise to aid in prompt recognition. Most previous studies have focused on the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. Yet only a small proportion of sepsis develops in the ICU and there is an apparent clinical benefit to identify patients earlier in the disease trajectory. In this cohort of 82,852 hospital admissions and 8038 sepsis episodes classified according to the Sepsis-3 criteria, we demonstrate that a machine learned score can predict sepsis onset within 48 h using sparse routine electronic health record data outside the ICU. Our score was based on a causal probabilistic network model-SepsisFinder-which has similarities with clinical reasoning. A prediction was generated hourly on all admissions, providing a new variable was registered. Compared to the National Early Warning Score (NEWS2), which is an established method to identify sepsis, the SepsisFinder triggered earlier and had a higher area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) (0.950 vs. 0.872), as well as area under precision-recall curve (APR) (0.189 vs. 0.149). A machine learning comparator based on a gradient-boosting decision tree model had similar AUROC (0.949) and higher APR (0.239) than SepsisFinder but triggered later than both NEWS2 and SepsisFinder. The precision of SepsisFinder increased if screening was restricted to the earlier admission period and in episodes with bloodstream infection. Furthermore, the SepsisFinder signaled median 5.5 h prior to antibiotic administration. Identifying a high-risk population with this method could be used to tailor clinical interventions and improve patient care.

摘要

脓毒症是导致死亡的主要原因,早期识别可提高生存率。随着医疗保健数据的数字化程度不断提高,自动化脓毒症预测模型有望帮助及时识别。大多数先前的研究都集中在重症监护病房(ICU)环境中。然而,只有一小部分脓毒症发生在 ICU 中,在疾病进程早期识别患者具有明显的临床益处。在这项纳入了 82852 例住院患者和 8038 例根据 Sepsis-3 标准分类的脓毒症病例的队列研究中,我们证明,使用 ICU 外稀疏常规电子健康记录数据,通过机器学习算法构建的评分可以在 48 小时内预测脓毒症的发生。我们的评分基于因果概率网络模型-SepsisFinder-它与临床推理有相似之处。在所有住院患者中每小时生成一次预测,当新变量被记录时。与用于识别脓毒症的既定方法-国家早期预警评分(NEWS2)相比,SepsisFinder 触发更早,且具有更高的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)(0.950 比 0.872),以及精度-召回曲线下面积(APR)(0.189 比 0.149)。基于梯度提升决策树模型的机器学习比较器具有类似的 AUROC(0.949)和更高的 APR(0.239),但比 NEWS2 和 SepsisFinder 触发时间更晚。如果将筛选限制在较早的住院期间,并在血流感染的病例中进行筛选,SepsisFinder 的准确率会提高。此外,SepsisFinder 在开始使用抗生素前的中位数 5.5 小时发出信号。使用这种方法识别高危人群可能有助于调整临床干预措施,改善患者护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f722/10359402/5cda1f1355bb/41598_2023_38858_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f722/10359402/dc3e565bbacb/41598_2023_38858_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f722/10359402/21d28d8f5312/41598_2023_38858_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f722/10359402/5cda1f1355bb/41598_2023_38858_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f722/10359402/dc3e565bbacb/41598_2023_38858_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f722/10359402/21d28d8f5312/41598_2023_38858_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f722/10359402/5cda1f1355bb/41598_2023_38858_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting sepsis onset using a machine learned causal probabilistic network algorithm based on electronic health records data.基于电子健康记录数据的机器学习因果概率网络算法预测脓毒症发病。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 20;13(1):11760. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38858-4.
2
Dynamic and explainable machine learning prediction of mortality in patients in the intensive care unit: a retrospective study of high-frequency data in electronic patient records.动态可解释机器学习预测 ICU 患者死亡率:电子患者记录中高频数据的回顾性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Apr;2(4):e179-e191. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30018-2. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
3
Multicentre validation of a sepsis prediction algorithm using only vital sign data in the emergency department, general ward and ICU.仅使用生命体征数据在急诊科、普通病房和重症监护病房对脓毒症预测算法进行多中心验证。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 26;8(1):e017833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017833.
4
Prediction of Sepsis in the Intensive Care Unit With Minimal Electronic Health Record Data: A Machine Learning Approach.利用最少电子健康记录数据预测重症监护病房中的脓毒症:一种机器学习方法。
JMIR Med Inform. 2016 Sep 30;4(3):e28. doi: 10.2196/medinform.5909.
5
An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Accurate Prediction of Sepsis in the ICU.一种用于 ICU 中脓毒症准确预测的可解释机器学习模型。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):547-553. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002936.
6
Graph Convolutional Networks-Based Noisy Data Imputation in Electronic Health Record.基于图卷积网络的电子健康记录中噪声数据插补。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;48(11):e1106-e1111. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004583.
7
A simple electronic medical record-based predictors of illness severity in sepsis (sepsis) score.基于简单电子病历的脓毒症(sepsis)疾病严重程度预测评分。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 26;19(6):e0299473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299473. eCollection 2024.
8
The development an artificial intelligence algorithm for early sepsis diagnosis in the intensive care unit.开发一种用于重症监护病房早期脓毒症诊断的人工智能算法。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Sep;141:104176. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104176. Epub 2020 May 21.
9
Predictors of outcomes in emergency department patients with suspected infections and without fulfillment of the sepsis criteria.疑似感染且未满足脓毒症标准的急诊科患者结局的预测因素。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Jun;68:144-154. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.03.022. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
10
Machine learning algorithms for early sepsis detection in the emergency department: A retrospective study.机器学习算法在急诊科早期脓毒症检测中的应用:一项回顾性研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Apr;160:104689. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104689. Epub 2022 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The future of healthcare-associated infection surveillance: Automated surveillance and using the potential of artificial intelligence.医疗保健相关感染监测的未来:自动监测与人工智能潜力的利用
J Intern Med. 2025 Aug;298(2):54-77. doi: 10.1111/joim.20100. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
2
Advancing sepsis diagnosis and immunotherapy machine learning-driven identification of stable molecular biomarkers and therapeutic targets.推进脓毒症诊断与免疫治疗:机器学习驱动的稳定分子生物标志物和治疗靶点识别
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 11;15(1):8333. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93010-8.
3
Harnessing artificial intelligence in sepsis care: advances in early detection, personalized treatment, and real-time monitoring.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors Associated With Variability in the Performance of a Proprietary Sepsis Prediction Model Across 9 Networked Hospitals in the US.美国9家联网医院中,与一种专利脓毒症预测模型性能变异性相关的因素
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Jun 1;183(6):611-612. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.7182.
2
Association Between Time to Appropriate Antimicrobial Treatment and 30-day Mortality in Patients With Bloodstream Infections: A Retrospective Cohort Study.适当抗菌治疗时间与血流感染患者 30 天死亡率之间的关系:一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 8;76(3):469-478. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac727.
3
Dynamic COVID risk assessment accounting for community virus exposure from a spatial-temporal transmission model.
脓毒症护理中人工智能的应用:早期检测、个性化治疗和实时监测的进展
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 6;11:1510792. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1510792. eCollection 2024.
4
Artificial Intelligence in Sepsis Management: An Overview for Clinicians.脓毒症管理中的人工智能:临床医生概述
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 6;14(1):286. doi: 10.3390/jcm14010286.
5
Early detection of sepsis using machine learning algorithms: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.使用机器学习算法早期检测败血症:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 16;11:1491358. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1491358. eCollection 2024.
6
Early Warning Systems for Critical Illness Outside the Intensive Care Unit.重症监护室外的危重病预警系统。
Crit Care Clin. 2024 Jul;40(3):561-581. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2024.03.007. Epub 2024 Apr 20.
7
AI integration in sepsis care: a step towards improved health and quality of life outcomes.人工智能在脓毒症护理中的整合:迈向改善健康和生活质量结局的一步。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Apr 4;86(5):2411-2412. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002012. eCollection 2024 May.
8
[Data-driven intensive care: a lack of comprehensive datasets].[数据驱动的重症监护:缺乏综合数据集]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2024 Jun;119(5):352-357. doi: 10.1007/s00063-024-01141-z. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
9
Predicting sepsis in-hospital mortality with machine learning: a multi-center study using clinical and inflammatory biomarkers.基于临床和炎症生物标志物的机器学习预测院内脓毒症死亡率:一项多中心研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Mar 6;29(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01756-0.
10
Analysis of prognostic factors in patients with emergency sepsis.急诊脓毒症患者的预后因素分析
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Sep 6;11(25):5903-5909. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i25.5903.
基于时空传播模型的动态新冠病毒风险评估,该模型考虑了社区病毒暴露情况。
Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2021 Dec;34:27747-27760.
4
Evaluating machine learning models for sepsis prediction: A systematic review of methodologies.评估用于脓毒症预测的机器学习模型:方法学的系统综述
iScience. 2021 Dec 20;25(1):103651. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103651. eCollection 2022 Jan 21.
5
OnAI-Comp: An Online AI Experts Competing Framework for Early Sepsis Detection.基于 AI 的专家在线竞赛框架在早期脓毒症检测中的应用
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2022 Nov-Dec;19(6):3595-3603. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2021.3122405. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
6
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021.拯救脓毒症运动:2021年脓毒症和脓毒性休克国际管理指南
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
7
Temporal Differential Expression of Physiomarkers Predicts Sepsis in Critically Ill Adults.生理标志物的时间差异表达可预测危重症成人脓毒症。
Shock. 2021 Jul 1;56(1):58-64. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001670.
8
Machine learning for early detection of sepsis: an internal and temporal validation study.用于脓毒症早期检测的机器学习:一项内部及时间验证研究。
JAMIA Open. 2020 Apr 11;3(2):252-260. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa006. eCollection 2020 Jul.
9
Incidence and mortality of hospital- and ICU-treated sepsis: results from an updated and expanded systematic review and meta-analysis.医院和 ICU 治疗的脓毒症的发病率和死亡率:一项更新和扩展的系统评价和荟萃分析的结果。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Aug;46(8):1552-1562. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06151-x. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
10
Leveraging electronic health record data to improve sepsis surveillance.利用电子健康记录数据改善脓毒症监测。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2020 Sep;29(9):706-710. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-010847. Epub 2020 Feb 27.