• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

衡量知识工作者的体面工作:构建并验证一个新量表。

Measuring the decent work of knowledge workers: Constructing and validating a new scale.

作者信息

Yan Yan, Geng Yuqing, Gao Juan

机构信息

School of Business, Shanghai Dianji University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2023 Jul 7;9(7):e17945. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17945. eCollection 2023 Jul.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17945
PMID:37496922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10366389/
Abstract

Through two and half decades, decent work (DW) has been studied mainly on unemployment and underemployment to promote workers' well-being, overlooking the importance of understanding knowledge of workers' (KW's) well-being in the workplace. However, the conflict between organizational performance and KW's well-being has intensified with technology development and the digital economy. This study constructs and validates a new scale for measuring the decent work perception (DWP) of KW in the context of knowledge management (KM). First, 27 in-depth interviews are conducted based on previous research results and grounded theory, resulting 4 dimensions consisting of 32 initial items identified by the KWs as reflecting their perception of DW. The 4dimensions of DWP are work security, respect & support, self-value, and professional skills. Second, 212 KWs participate in the preliminary survey, identifying the initial questionnaire's validity and selecting 13 items from the original questionnaire. Finally, 554 questionnaires are collected for the formal survey. According to exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmative factor analysis (CFA), the 13-item decent work perception scale (DWPS) has reasonable reliability and validity. Considering the characteristics of work challenges, work autonomy, and career commitment of KWs, this study contributes to the knowledge of respect & support, self-value, and professional skills on DWPS. It is concluded that the DWPS can be applied to measure DW for KWs. As an effective measurement tool for KWs, this scale is also crucial for helping employees achieve their career goals, and managers understand KWs' demands theoretically and practically.

摘要

在二十五年多的时间里,体面工作(DW)的研究主要集中在失业和就业不足方面,以促进工人福祉,却忽视了理解工作场所中工人福祉知识(KW)的重要性。然而,随着技术发展和数字经济的兴起,组织绩效与KW福祉之间的冲突日益加剧。本研究构建并验证了一种新的量表,用于衡量知识管理(KM)背景下KW的体面工作认知(DWP)。首先,基于先前的研究成果和扎根理论进行了27次深度访谈,得出了4个维度,由KW确定的32个初始项目组成,这些项目反映了他们对DW的认知。DWP的4个维度分别是工作保障、尊重与支持、自我价值和专业技能。其次,212名KW参与了初步调查,确定了初始问卷的有效性,并从原始问卷中筛选出13个项目。最后,收集了554份问卷进行正式调查。根据探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA),13项体面工作认知量表(DWPS)具有合理的信度和效度。考虑到KW的工作挑战、工作自主性和职业承诺的特点,本研究对DWPS上的尊重与支持、自我价值和专业技能知识有所贡献。研究得出结论,DWPS可用于衡量KW的体面工作。作为KW的一种有效测量工具,该量表对于帮助员工实现职业目标以及管理者从理论和实践上理解KW的需求也至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62b5/10366389/968e2a192bf3/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62b5/10366389/36a36528f815/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62b5/10366389/968e2a192bf3/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62b5/10366389/36a36528f815/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62b5/10366389/968e2a192bf3/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Measuring the decent work of knowledge workers: Constructing and validating a new scale.衡量知识工作者的体面工作:构建并验证一个新量表。
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 7;9(7):e17945. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17945. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the pros and cons of anorexia nervosa (P-CAN-C) scale: a validation study in patients with anorexia nervosa.神经性厌食症利弊中文版量表(P-CAN-C)的心理测量学特性:一项针对神经性厌食症患者的效度研究
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 16;13(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01314-x.
3
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
4
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
5
Clinical rating scales for assessing pain in newborn infants.评估新生儿疼痛的临床评定量表。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 14;4(4):MR000064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000064.pub2.
6
Examining Canadian Hospitals' Support for Planetary Health Through the Implementation of Green Teams and Sustainability Offices.通过绿色团队和可持续发展办公室的实施来审视加拿大医院对地球健康的支持。
J Healthc Leadersh. 2025 Jun 11;17:269-284. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S517669. eCollection 2025.
7
Molecular feature-based classification of retroperitoneal liposarcoma: a prospective cohort study.基于分子特征的腹膜后脂肪肉瘤分类:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Elife. 2025 May 23;14:RP100887. doi: 10.7554/eLife.100887.
8
Anxiety-related attentional characteristics and their relation to freezing of gait in people with Parkinson's: Cross-validation of the Adapted Gait Specific Attentional Profile (G-SAP).帕金森病患者焦虑相关的注意力特征及其与步态冻结的关系:适应性步态特定注意力概况(G-SAP)的交叉验证
J Parkinsons Dis. 2025 Jun;15(4):829-842. doi: 10.1177/1877718X251326266. Epub 2025 May 20.
9
Wood Waste Valorization and Classification Approaches: A systematic review.木材废料的增值与分类方法:一项系统综述
Open Res Eur. 2025 May 6;5:5. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.18862.1. eCollection 2025.
10
Introducing the dataset for measuring centrality for sustainability-A case study of Pecinci municipality, Serbia.介绍用于衡量可持续性中心性的数据集——以塞尔维亚佩钦奇市为例
Data Brief. 2025 May 27;61:111714. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2025.111714. eCollection 2025 Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
Social dilemma for 30 years: Progress, framework, and future based on CiteSpace analysis.30年的社会困境:基于CiteSpace分析的进展、框架与未来
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Dec 27;103(52):e41138. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041138.
2
Authenticity: Effective emotional labor strategies on teaching efficacy of university teachers in China.真实性:中国高校教师有效情绪劳动策略对教学效能的影响
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 26;19(1):e0297760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297760. eCollection 2024.
3
The dual influence path of decent work perception on employee innovative behavior.

本文引用的文献

1
Overtime work, job autonomy, and employees' subjective well-being: Evidence from China.超时工作、工作自主性与员工主观幸福感:来自中国的证据。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 17;11:1077177. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1077177. eCollection 2023.
2
How Does Collective Moral Judgment Induce Unethical Pro-Organizational Behaviors in Infrastructure Construction Projects: The Mediating Role of Machiavellianism.集体道德判断如何在基础设施建设项目中诱发不道德的亲组织行为:马基雅维利主义的中介作用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jan 8;13(1):57. doi: 10.3390/bs13010057.
3
Differences in Subjective Well-Being between Formal and Informal Workers in Urban China.
体面工作认知对员工创新行为的双重影响路径。
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 21;14:1302945. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1302945. eCollection 2023.
城乡正式工与非正式工主观幸福感差异研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 22;20(1):149. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010149.
4
Home sweet home: Working from home and employee performance during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.家,甜蜜的家:英国新冠疫情期间的居家办公与员工绩效
Labour Econ. 2023 Jan;80:102295. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2022.102295. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
5
Bibliometric review of carbon neutrality with CiteSpace: evolution, trends, and framework.利用CiteSpace对碳中和进行的文献计量学综述:演变、趋势与框架
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Nov;29(51):76668-76686. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23283-3. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
6
Occupational Safety and Health Staging Framework for Decent Work.职业安全与健康阶段性框架促进体面劳动
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 31;19(17):10842. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710842.
7
Aging and the Future of Decent Work.老龄化与体面工作的未来。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 24;18(17):8898. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18178898.
8
Psychosocial impact of COVID-19 for general workers.新型冠状病毒肺炎对普通劳动者的社会心理影响
J Occup Health. 2020 Jan;62(1):e12132. doi: 10.1002/1348-9585.12132.
9
Decent and meaningful work: A longitudinal study.有尊严且有意义的工作:一项纵向研究。
J Couns Psychol. 2020 Nov;67(6):669-679. doi: 10.1037/cou0000432. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
10
Why Work Overtime? A Systematic Review on the Evolutionary Trend and Influencing Factors of Work Hours in China.为何加班?关于中国工作时长演变趋势及影响因素的系统综述
Front Public Health. 2019 Nov 15;7:343. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00343. eCollection 2019.