Suppr超能文献

激励和阻碍应急响应志愿者的因素是什么?一项基于调查的因素分析研究。

What motivates and demotivates emergency response volunteers? A survey-based factor analysis study.

机构信息

Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Department of Science and Technology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Aug 12;31(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01101-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Organized volunteer initiatives can reduce response times and improve outcomes in emergencies such as cardiac arrests or fires. Retention of volunteers is important to maintain good coverage and capabilities. The current study explores factors underlying volunteers' motivation to continue as volunteers.

METHODS

Data from 5347 active volunteers were collected through an online survey. An exploratory factor analysis was used to identify underlying factors that were then used in a regression analysis to predict intention to continue as a volunteer. Group differences based on, among others, number of alarms and prior professional experience in emergency response were explored.

RESULTS

The results showed that the factors community, self-image, and competence were the strongest positive predictors for the motivation to continue, whereas alarm fatigue and negative experience were the strongest negative predictors. Volunteers with professional background had higher competence and lower Alarm fatigue. Volunteers from rural areas and small cities had higher community than those in large cities.

CONCLUSIONS

Alarm fatigue can make it hard to retain volunteers, which could be addressed using improved dispatch algorithms. Support after dispatch is important to prevent negative experiences. Finally, increased competence, e.g. through education and training, can improve volunteer's motivation to continue.

摘要

背景

有组织的志愿者倡议可以减少紧急情况(如心脏骤停或火灾)中的响应时间并改善结果。保留志愿者对于保持良好的覆盖率和能力很重要。本研究探讨了志愿者继续作为志愿者的动机背后的因素。

方法

通过在线调查收集了 5347 名活跃志愿者的数据。采用探索性因素分析来确定潜在因素,然后使用回归分析来预测继续作为志愿者的意愿。根据警报数量和先前在紧急响应方面的专业经验等因素,探讨了组间差异。

结果

结果表明,社区、自我形象和能力是继续参与的最强积极预测因素,而警报疲劳和负面体验则是最强的负面预测因素。有专业背景的志愿者具有更高的能力和更低的警报疲劳。来自农村和小城市的志愿者比来自大城市的志愿者具有更高的社区意识。

结论

警报疲劳会使志愿者难以保留,这可以通过改进调度算法来解决。调度后的支持对于防止负面体验很重要。最后,通过教育和培训提高能力,例如,可提高志愿者继续参与的动力。

相似文献

9
The changing role of volunteerism.志愿服务角色的转变。
Pap Ser United Hosp Fund N Y. 1993 Apr(23):1-37.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验