• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公民响应者的心理困扰、情境因素和个体差异的关联。

Association of Psychological Distress, Contextual Factors, and Individual Differences Among Citizen Responders.

机构信息

Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services University of Copenhagen Denmark.

Department of Psychology University of Copenhagen Denmark.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 6;10(13):e020378. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020378. Epub 2021 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.120.020378
PMID:34212765
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8403282/
Abstract

Background Little is known about the psychological risks of dispatched citizen responders who have participated in resuscitation attempts. Methods and Results A cross-sectional survey study was performed with 102 citizen responders who participated in a resuscitation attempt from July 23, 2018, to August 22, 2018, in the Capital Region of Denmark. Psychological distress, defined as symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, was assessed 3 weeks after the resuscitation attempt and measured with the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. Perceived stress was measured with the Perceived Stress Scale. Individual differences were assessed as the personality traits of agreeableness, conscientiousness, extraversion, neuroticism, and openness to experience with the Big Five Inventory, general self-efficacy, and coping mechanisms (Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory). Associations between continuous variables were examined with the Pearson correlation. The associations between psychological distress levels and contextual factors and individual differences were analyzed in multivariable linear regression models to determine factors independently associated with psychological distress levels. The mean overall posttraumatic stress disorder score was 0.65 of 12; the mean perceived stress score was 7.61 of 40. The most common coping mechanisms were acceptance and emotional support. Low perceived stress was significantly associated with high general self-efficacy, and high perceived stress was significantly associated with high scores on neuroticism and openness to experience. Non-healthcare professionals were less likely to report symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder. Conclusions Citizen responders who participated in resuscitation reported low levels of psychological distress. Individual differences were significantly associated with levels of psychological distress and should be considered when engaging citizen responders in resuscitation.

摘要

背景

对于参与复苏尝试的派遣公民响应者所面临的心理风险知之甚少。

方法和结果

本研究采用横断面调查,于 2018 年 7 月 23 日至 8 月 22 日期间在丹麦首都地区招募了 102 名参与复苏尝试的公民响应者。心理困扰(定义为创伤后应激障碍症状)在复苏尝试后 3 周进行评估,采用修订后的事件影响量表进行测量。感知压力采用感知压力量表进行测量。个体差异通过大五人格量表、一般自我效能感和应对机制(简要应对问题体验量表)评估。连续变量之间的关联采用 Pearson 相关分析。多变量线性回归模型分析心理困扰水平与情境因素和个体差异之间的关联,以确定与心理困扰水平独立相关的因素。总体创伤后应激障碍评分的平均值为 12 分中的 0.65 分;感知压力的平均得分为 40 分中的 7.61 分。最常见的应对机制是接受和情感支持。低感知压力与高一般自我效能感显著相关,高感知压力与高神经质和开放性显著相关。非医护专业人员报告创伤后应激障碍症状的可能性较低。

结论

参与复苏的公民响应者报告的心理困扰程度较低。个体差异与心理困扰水平显著相关,在招募公民响应者参与复苏时应考虑这些因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca49/8403282/fa3bb2471a02/JAH3-10-e020378-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca49/8403282/f8dad76fefe7/JAH3-10-e020378-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca49/8403282/8389d83f5063/JAH3-10-e020378-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca49/8403282/d97954c8a238/JAH3-10-e020378-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca49/8403282/7ac90fd5ea46/JAH3-10-e020378-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca49/8403282/fa3bb2471a02/JAH3-10-e020378-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca49/8403282/f8dad76fefe7/JAH3-10-e020378-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca49/8403282/8389d83f5063/JAH3-10-e020378-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca49/8403282/d97954c8a238/JAH3-10-e020378-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca49/8403282/7ac90fd5ea46/JAH3-10-e020378-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca49/8403282/fa3bb2471a02/JAH3-10-e020378-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Association of Psychological Distress, Contextual Factors, and Individual Differences Among Citizen Responders.公民响应者的心理困扰、情境因素和个体差异的关联。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 6;10(13):e020378. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020378. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
2
Evaluation of tools to assess psychological distress: how to measure psychological stress reactions in citizen responders- a systematic review.评估心理困扰评估工具:如何测量公民应急响应者的心理应激反应——一项系统综述
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Nov 4;19(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0278-6.
3
Why are some drought-affected farmers less distressed than others? The association between stress, psychological distress, acceptance, behavioural disengagement and neuroticism.为什么有些受干旱影响的农民没有那么苦恼?压力、心理困扰、接受、行为脱离和神经质之间的关系。
Aust J Rural Health. 2021 Feb;29(1):106-116. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12695. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
4
Collaboration between emergency physicians and citizen responders in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation.急诊医师与公民响应者在院外心脏骤停复苏中的合作。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Aug 3;29(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00927-w.
5
Association between the Five Factor personality traits and perceived stress: is the effect mediated by general self-efficacy?五因素人格特质与感知压力的关系:这种效应是否受到一般自我效能感的中介?
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2011 Jul;24(4):407-19. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2010.540012.
6
Risk of Physical Injury for Dispatched Citizen Responders to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.派遣公民对院外心脏骤停者进行急救的身体伤害风险。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 20;10(14):e021626. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021626. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
7
Posttraumatic stress disorder following myocardial infarction: personality, coping, and trauma exposure characteristics.心肌梗死后创伤后应激障碍:人格、应对方式和创伤暴露特征。
Int J Psychiatry Med. 2011;42(4):393-419. doi: 10.2190/PM.42.4.e.
8
Immediate psychological impact on citizen responders dispatched through a mobile application to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.通过移动应用程序派遣至院外心脏骤停现场的民众急救人员的即时心理影响。
Resusc Plus. 2021 Aug 13;7:100155. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2021.100155. eCollection 2021 Sep.
9
Do Personality Traits Mediate the Relationship Between Childhood Abuse and Migraine? An Exploration of the Relationships in Young Adults Using the Add Health Dataset.人格特质是否在儿童期虐待与偏头痛之间起中介作用?利用“健康增进纵向研究”数据对青年期两者关系的探讨。
Headache. 2018 Feb;58(2):243-259. doi: 10.1111/head.13206. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
10
Longitudinal interplay between posttraumatic stress symptoms and coping self-efficacy: A four-wave prospective study.创伤后应激症状与应对自我效能感之间的纵向相互作用:一项四波前瞻性研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jun;134:23-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Smartphone-activated volunteer responders and survival to discharge after out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in Victoria, 2018-23: an observational cohort study.2018 - 2023年维多利亚州院外心脏骤停后智能手机激活的志愿者响应者与出院生存率:一项观察性队列研究
Med J Aust. 2025 Jun 2;222(10):504-509. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52673. Epub 2025 May 19.
2
Psychological impact on first responders dispatched to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest via smartphone alerting system: A longitudinal survey-based study.通过智能手机警报系统派遣急救人员对院外心脏骤停的心理影响:一项基于纵向调查的研究。
Resusc Plus. 2025 Mar 22;23:100941. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2025.100941. eCollection 2025 May.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Crowdsourcing to save lives: A scoping review of bystander alert technologies for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.众包拯救生命:院外心脏骤停旁观者警报技术的范围综述
Resuscitation. 2021 Jan;158:94-121. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.10.035. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
2
Part 7: Systems of Care: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.第七部分:照护系统:2020 年美国心脏协会心肺复苏与紧急心血管护理指南。
Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_2):S580-S604. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000899. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
3
Pivotal Role in the Community Response to Cardiac Arrest: The Smart Bystander.
Volunteer responders' experience of attending a paediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Denmark: a qualitative study.
丹麦志愿者急救人员参与儿童院外心脏骤停事件的经历:一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 13;15(2):e093913. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093913.
4
"Shrink back is not my intention": a qualitative exploration of Chinese security guards' experiences with bystander CPR.“退缩非我本意”:对中国保安人员旁观者心肺复苏经历的质性探索
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):3420. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20888-w.
5
What motivates and demotivates emergency response volunteers? A survey-based factor analysis study.激励和阻碍应急响应志愿者的因素是什么?一项基于调查的因素分析研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2023 Aug 12;31(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01101-0.
6
Follow-up on volunteer responders dispatched for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests: Addressing the psychological and physical impact.对因院外心脏骤停而被派遣的志愿急救人员的随访:应对心理和身体影响。
Resusc Plus. 2023 Jun 1;14:100402. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100402. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder among first aid providers.急救人员中创伤后应激障碍的症状。
Resusc Plus. 2023 Mar 9;14:100373. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100373. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Evaluation of a critical incident management system on mental health in lifeguard organisations: a retrospective study.救生员组织中重大事件管理系统对心理健康影响的评估:一项回顾性研究。
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2023 Jan 23;9(1):e001499. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2022-001499. eCollection 2023.
9
The effect of the GoodSAM volunteer first-responder app on survival to hospital discharge following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.GoodSAM 志愿者急救员应用对院外心脏骤停后存活至出院的影响。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2022 Jan 12;11(1):20-31. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuab103.
10
Collaboration between emergency physicians and citizen responders in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation.急诊医师与公民响应者在院外心脏骤停复苏中的合作。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Aug 3;29(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00927-w.
在社区对心脏骤停的应对中发挥关键作用:智能旁观者。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jul 7;76(1):54-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.034.
4
Smartphone Activation of Citizen Responders to Facilitate Defibrillation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.智能手机激活公民响应者,以促进院外心脏骤停时的除颤。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Jul 7;76(1):43-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.073.
5
AED and text message responders density in residential areas for rapid response in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.用于院外心脏骤停快速响应的居民区自动体外除颤器(AED)和短信响应者密度
Resuscitation. 2020 May;150:170-177. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.01.031. Epub 2020 Feb 8.
6
Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Europe - Results of the EuReCa TWO study.欧洲院外心脏骤停后的生存率——EuReCa TWO研究结果
Resuscitation. 2020 Mar 1;148:218-226. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.12.042. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
7
First-response treatment after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a survey of current practices across 29 countries in Europe.院外心脏骤停后的急救治疗:对欧洲 29 个国家当前实践情况的调查。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Dec 16;27(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0689-0.
8
Survival in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest After Standard Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation or Chest Compressions Only Before Arrival of Emergency Medical Services: Nationwide Study During Three Guideline Periods.在紧急医疗服务到达之前进行标准心肺复苏或仅进行胸外按压的院外心脏骤停患者的生存情况:三个指南时期的全国性研究
Circulation. 2019 Jun 4;139(23):2600-2609. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038179. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
9
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《2019年心脏病和中风统计数据更新:美国心脏协会报告》
Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10):e56-e528. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659.
10
"Please. Don't. Die.": A Grounded Theory Study of Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.“求你了。别。死。”:旁观者心肺复苏的扎根理论研究
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Feb;11(2):e004035. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004035.