• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人异源接种后非典型 B 细胞和 SARS-CoV-2 中和作用受损。

Atypical B cells and impaired SARS-CoV-2 neutralization following heterologous vaccination in the elderly.

机构信息

Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease (CITIID), Cambridge, UK; Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Molecular Immunity Unit, Department of Medicine, Medical Research Council Laboratory of Molecular Biology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Cellular Genetics, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Cell Rep. 2023 Aug 29;42(8):112991. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112991. Epub 2023 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112991
PMID:37590132
Abstract

Suboptimal responses to a primary vaccination course have been reported in the elderly, but there is little information regarding the impact of age on responses to booster third doses. Here, we show that individuals 70 years or older (median age 73, range 70-75) who received a primary two-dose schedule with AZD1222 and booster third dose with mRNA vaccine achieve significantly lower neutralizing antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 spike pseudotyped virus compared with those younger than 70 (median age 66, range 54-69) at 1 month post booster. Impaired neutralization potency and breadth post third dose in the elderly is associated with circulating "atypical" spike-specific B cells expressing CD11c and FCRL5. However, when considering individuals who received three doses of mRNA vaccine, we did not observe differences in neutralization or enrichment in atypical B cells. This work highlights the finding that AdV and mRNA COVID-19 vaccine formats differentially instruct the memory B cell response.

摘要

老年人在初次接种疫苗后出现的反应不理想,但关于年龄对加强型第三针反应的影响的信息很少。在这里,我们发现,与 70 岁以下的人(中位年龄 66 岁,范围 54-69 岁)相比,接受了 AZD1222 双价基础免疫和 mRNA 疫苗加强型第三针的 70 岁及以上(中位年龄 73 岁,范围 70-75 岁)人群在加强针后 1 个月时针对 SARS-CoV-2 刺突假病毒的中和抗体反应显著降低。在老年人中,第三针后中和作用的效力和广度受损与循环中表达 CD11c 和 FCRL5 的“非典型”刺突特异性 B 细胞有关。然而,当考虑接受三剂 mRNA 疫苗的个体时,我们没有观察到中和作用或非典型 B 细胞的富集存在差异。这项工作强调了这样一个发现,即 AdV 和 mRNA COVID-19 疫苗制剂以不同的方式指导记忆 B 细胞反应。

相似文献

1
Atypical B cells and impaired SARS-CoV-2 neutralization following heterologous vaccination in the elderly.老年人异源接种后非典型 B 细胞和 SARS-CoV-2 中和作用受损。
Cell Rep. 2023 Aug 29;42(8):112991. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112991. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
2
Heterologous versus homologous COVID-19 booster vaccination in previous recipients of two doses of CoronaVac COVID-19 vaccine in Brazil (RHH-001): a phase 4, non-inferiority, single blind, randomised study.巴西两剂科兴新冠疫苗(CoronaVac)既往接种者中异源与同源加强接种 COVID-19 疫苗(RHH-001):一项四期、非劣效性、单盲、随机研究。
Lancet. 2022 Feb 5;399(10324):521-529. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00094-0. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
3
Humoral immune response after different SARS-CoV-2 vaccination regimens.不同 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗接种方案后的体液免疫应答。
BMC Med. 2022 Jan 21;20(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02231-x.
4
Heterologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BNT162b2 prime-boost vaccination elicits potent neutralizing antibody responses and T cell reactivity against prevalent SARS-CoV-2 variants.异源 ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 和 BNT162b2 疫苗加强接种可引发针对流行的 SARS-CoV-2 变体的强大中和抗体反应和 T 细胞反应性。
EBioMedicine. 2022 Jan;75:103761. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103761. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
5
Safety and immunogenicity of seven COVID-19 vaccines as a third dose (booster) following two doses of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 or BNT162b2 in the UK (COV-BOOST): a blinded, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial.在英国,用 ChAdOx1 nCov-19 或 BNT162b2 接种两剂后作为第三剂(加强针)接种 7 种 COVID-19 疫苗的安全性和免疫原性(COV-BOOST):一项盲法、多中心、随机、对照、2 期试验。
Lancet. 2021 Dec 18;398(10318):2258-2276. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02717-3. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
6
Immunogenicity and reactogenicity against the SARS-CoV-2 variants following heterologous primary series involving CoronaVac, ChAdox1 nCov-19 and BNT162b2 plus BNT162b2 booster vaccination: An open-label randomized study in healthy Thai adults.接种科兴新冠疫苗、腺病毒载体新冠疫苗和辉瑞疫苗加强针后对 SARS-CoV-2 变异株的免疫原性和反应原性:一项在泰国健康成年人中开展的开放标签随机研究。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022 Nov 30;18(6):2091865. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2091865. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
7
Comparative effectiveness of heterologous third dose vaccine schedules against severe covid-19 during omicron predominance in Nordic countries: population based cohort analyses.在北欧国家奥密克戎为主导期间,不同异源第三剂疫苗接种方案对严重 COVID-19 的效果比较:基于人群的队列分析。
BMJ. 2023 Jul 24;382:e074325. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-074325.
8
Titers and breadth of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants after heterologous booster vaccination in health care workers primed with two doses of ChAdOx1 nCov-19: A single-blinded, randomized clinical trial.两剂腺病毒载体新冠疫苗(ChAdOx1 nCov-19)基础免疫后异源加强接种对医护人员体内针对 SARS-CoV-2 变异株中和抗体滴度和广度的影响:一项单盲、随机临床试验。
J Clin Virol. 2022 Dec;157:105328. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2022.105328. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
9
Persistence of immune responses after heterologous and homologous third COVID-19 vaccine dose schedules in the UK: eight-month analyses of the COV-BOOST trial.在英国,使用不同的第三剂 COVID-19 疫苗接种方案进行同源和异源加强免疫后免疫应答的持久性:COV-BOOST 试验的 8 个月分析。
J Infect. 2023 Jul;87(1):18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2023.04.012. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
10
Humoral responses to wild type and ancient BA.1 SARS-CoV-2 variant after heterologous priming vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BNT162b2 booster dose.异源加强接种 ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 和 BNT162b2 后对野生型和古老 BA.1 SARS-CoV-2 变异株的体液反应。
Clin Exp Med. 2024 Jan 20;24(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s10238-023-01276-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Immune Durability and Breakthrough Infections 15 Months After SARS-CoV-2 Boosters in People over 65: The IMMERSION Study.65岁以上人群接种新冠病毒加强针15个月后的免疫持久性和突破性感染:IMMERSION研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Jul 9;13(7):738. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13070738.
2
The Application of Single-Cell Technologies for Vaccine Development Against Viral Infections.单细胞技术在抗病毒感染疫苗研发中的应用
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Jun 26;13(7):687. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13070687.
3
Age-associated defect in ADCC response to COVID-19 vaccine.
与年龄相关的对新冠疫苗的抗体依赖的细胞介导的细胞毒性反应缺陷
NPJ Vaccines. 2025 Jul 1;10(1):132. doi: 10.1038/s41541-025-01196-9.
4
Humoral responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in vasculitis-related immune suppression.血管炎相关免疫抑制患者对SARS-CoV-2疫苗的体液免疫反应。
Sci Adv. 2025 Feb 14;11(7):eadq3342. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adq3342. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
5
Immune signature in vaccinated versus non-vaccinated aged people with COVID-19 pneumonia.接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的老年 COVID-19 肺炎患者的免疫特征。
J Transl Med. 2024 Aug 12;22(1):755. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-05556-2.
6
Atypical and non-classical CD45RB memory B cells are the majority of circulating SARS-CoV-2 specific B cells following mRNA vaccination or COVID-19.非典型和非经典 CD45RB 记忆 B 细胞是 mRNA 疫苗接种或 COVID-19 后循环 SARS-CoV-2 特异性 B 细胞的主要类型。
Nat Commun. 2024 Aug 9;15(1):6811. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50997-4.
7
Lower Humoral and Cellular Immunity Following Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection Compared to Symptomatic Infection in Education (The ACE Cohort).无症状 SARS-CoV-2 感染后的体液和细胞免疫反应低于有症状感染:教育队列研究(ACE 队列)。
J Clin Immunol. 2024 Jun 10;44(6):147. doi: 10.1007/s10875-024-01739-0.
8
Children with perinatally acquired HIV exhibit distinct immune responses to 4CMenB vaccine.围生期感染 HIV 的儿童对 4CMenB 疫苗表现出不同的免疫反应。
JCI Insight. 2024 Apr 11;9(10):e177182. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.177182.
9
Diminished neutralizing activity against the XBB1.5 strain in 55.9% of individuals post 6 months COVID-19 mRNA booster vaccination: insights from a pseudovirus assay on 1,353 participants in the Fukushima vaccination community survey, Japan.在 COVID-19 mRNA 加强针接种 6 个月后,55.9%的个体对 XBB1.5 株的中和活性降低:来自日本福岛疫苗接种社区调查中 1353 名参与者的假病毒检测的结果。
Front Immunol. 2024 Mar 18;15:1337520. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1337520. eCollection 2024.
10
SARS-CoV-2 and innate immunity: the good, the bad, and the "goldilocks".SARS-CoV-2 与先天免疫:好、坏与“恰到好处”。
Cell Mol Immunol. 2024 Feb;21(2):171-183. doi: 10.1038/s41423-023-01104-y. Epub 2023 Nov 20.