• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

投票给民主党的性别差距部分源于选民中女性比男性黑人比例更高。

Part of the gender gap in voting for Democrats arises because a higher proportion of women than men voters are Black.

机构信息

Division of Social Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

Department of Sociology, New York University, New York, NY 10012.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jun 20;120(25):e2221910120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2221910120. Epub 2023 Jun 12.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2221910120
PMID:37307489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10288652/
Abstract

Women voted for the Democratic candidate more than men did in each US presidential election since 1980. We show that part of the gender gap stems from the fact that a higher proportion of women than men voters are Black, and Black voters overwhelmingly choose Democratic candidates. Past research shows that Black men have especially high rates of death, incarceration, and disenfranchisement due to criminal convictions. These disparities reduce the share of men voters who are Black. We show that the gender difference in racial composition explains 24% of the gender gap in voting Democratic. The gender gap in voting Democratic is especially large among those who are never-married, and, among them, the differing racial composition of men and women voters is more impactful than in the population at large, explaining 43% of the gender gap. We consider an alternative hypothesis that income differences between single men and women explain the gender gap in voting, but our analysis leads us to reject it. Although unmarried women are poorer than unmarried men, and lower-income voters vote slightly more Democratic, the latter difference is too small for income to explain much of the gender gap in voting. In short, the large gender gap among unmarried voters is not a reflection of the lower incomes of women's households but does reflect the fact that women voters are disproportionately Black. We used the General Social Survey as the data source for the analysis, then replicated results with the American National Election Survey data.

摘要

自 1980 年以来,在每届美国总统选举中,女性投票给民主党的比例都高于男性。我们发现,性别差距的部分原因在于,选民中女性黑人的比例高于男性,而黑人选民压倒性地选择民主党候选人。过去的研究表明,由于刑事定罪,黑人男性的死亡率、监禁率和被剥夺选举权的比率特别高。这些差异减少了黑人男性选民的比例。我们发现,种族构成的性别差异解释了投票支持民主党的性别差距的 24%。在从未结婚的人中,投票支持民主党的性别差距尤其大,而在这些人中,男性和女性选民的种族构成差异比总体人口更为显著,解释了性别差距的 43%。我们考虑了另一种假设,即单身男性和女性之间的收入差异解释了投票支持民主党的性别差距,但我们的分析使我们否定了这一假设。尽管未婚女性比未婚男性贫穷,而低收入选民投票略倾向于民主党,但后者的差异太小,无法用收入来解释投票支持民主党的性别差距的大部分原因。简而言之,未婚选民中的巨大性别差距并不是女性家庭收入较低的反映,而是反映了这样一个事实,即女性选民中黑人的比例过高。我们使用综合社会调查作为分析的数据源,然后使用美国全国选举调查数据复制了结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b69e/10288652/195276310926/pnas.2221910120fig05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b69e/10288652/6a677db911bd/pnas.2221910120fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b69e/10288652/a06cc5bb4e02/pnas.2221910120fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b69e/10288652/aa755e181d27/pnas.2221910120fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b69e/10288652/80cffd99f528/pnas.2221910120fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b69e/10288652/195276310926/pnas.2221910120fig05.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b69e/10288652/6a677db911bd/pnas.2221910120fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b69e/10288652/a06cc5bb4e02/pnas.2221910120fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b69e/10288652/aa755e181d27/pnas.2221910120fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b69e/10288652/80cffd99f528/pnas.2221910120fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b69e/10288652/195276310926/pnas.2221910120fig05.jpg

相似文献

1
Part of the gender gap in voting for Democrats arises because a higher proportion of women than men voters are Black.投票给民主党的性别差距部分源于选民中女性比男性黑人比例更高。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jun 20;120(25):e2221910120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2221910120. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
2
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
3
The political gender gap: gender bias in facial inferences that predict voting behavior.政治性别差距:预测投票行为的面部推断中的性别偏见。
PLoS One. 2008;3(10):e3666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003666. Epub 2008 Oct 31.
4
The abortion issue in the 1980 elections.1980年选举中的堕胎问题。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1983 Sep-Oct;15(5):231-8.
5
Social Security: a financial appraisal for the median voter.社会保障:对中位选民的财务评估。
Soc Secur Bull. 2001;64(2):57-65.
6
Adoption of Strategies to Mitigate Transmission of COVID-19 During a Statewide Primary Election - Delaware, September 2020.在全州初选期间采用策略来减轻 COVID-19 传播 - 特拉华州,2020 年 9 月。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Oct 30;69(43):1571-1575. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6943e2.
7
Political environment and mortality rates in the United States, 2001-19: population based cross sectional analysis.2001-2019 年美国的政治环境与死亡率:基于人群的横断面分析。
BMJ. 2022 Jun 7;377:e069308. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069308.
8
Black lives matter: Differential mortality and the racial composition of the U.S. electorate, 1970-2004.黑人的命也是命:1970年至2004年美国选民中的死亡率差异与种族构成
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Jul;136-137:193-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.04.014. Epub 2015 Apr 21.
9
Political voting in the United Kingdom 2019 general election and risk of living with obesity in a nationally representative sample.2019 年英国大选的政治投票与全国代表性样本中肥胖风险的关系。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2024 Oct;48(10):1430-1437. doi: 10.1038/s41366-024-01569-5. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
10
Emergency Absentee Voting for Hospitalized Patients and Voting During COVID-19: A 50-State Study.紧急情况下为住院患者提供缺席投票和在 COVID-19 期间投票:一项 50 个州的研究。
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Jul 15;22(4):1000-1009. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.4.50884.

引用本文的文献

1
Resident perspectives on a pre-booking diversion program.住院医师对预预约分流计划的看法。
Contemp Drug Probl. 2024 Jun;51(2):129-141. doi: 10.1177/00914509241246083. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
2
Race, gender, and partisan politics in the United States.美国的种族、性别与党派政治。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jun 20;120(25):e2307714120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2307714120. Epub 2023 Jun 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing logit & probit coefficients between nested models.比较嵌套模型之间的逻辑回归系数和概率回归系数。
Soc Sci Res. 2023 Jan;109:102802. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102802. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
2
Progress toward gender equality in the United States has slowed or stalled.美国在性别平等方面的进展已经放缓或停滞。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 31;117(13):6990-6997. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1918891117.
3
Long-term trends in adult mortality for U.S. Blacks and Whites: an examination of period- and cohort-based changes.美国黑人和白人成年人死亡率的长期趋势:基于时期和队列变化的考察
Demography. 2014 Dec;51(6):2047-73. doi: 10.1007/s13524-014-0343-4.