• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《大麻知识评估工具(CKAT)的开发》。

The development of a Cannabis Knowledge Assessment Tool (CKAT).

机构信息

College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

School of Public Health, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Sep 1;18(9):e0291113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291113. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0291113
PMID:37656712
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10473536/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Misconceptions about the health risks of cannabis remain prevalent, indicating the need to improve public health messaging and determine the effectiveness of educational programming. Our objective was to develop a standardized questionnaire to measure knowledge about cannabis in the context of cannabis legalization.

METHODS

A Cannabis Knowledge Assessment Tool (CKAT) was created using the Delphi method. A purposive sample of healthcare professionals, policymakers, academics, patients, and students served as the content and development experts. Principal component analysis from the codes identified from open-ended feedback guided the item development. Upon completion, the CKAT was administered as a pre- and post-test in four schools (7th and 9th Grade) in Canada. The data were analysed to determine whether knowledge scores changed after participating in a cannabis education program.

RESULTS

Twenty-four experts initially participated in the Delphi process and 18 (75% retention) continued throughout. Principal component analysis identified 3 domains: 1) effects of cannabis on the individual, 2) general information about cannabis, and 3) cannabis harm reduction. The final questionnaire consisted of 16 multiple-true-false questions (64 items) and received a Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level of 6.3, and a SMOG index score of 7.6. The CKAT was completed by 132 students; seventy-three 7th grade and fifty-nine 9th grade students. The baseline mean CKAT score was 46.2 (SD:5.5), which increased to 50.7 (SD:4.6) after the cannabis educational program (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A novel tool to measure knowledge of cannabis was developed and piloted in 7th grade and 9th grade students. Future studies are required to test usability and validity of the CKAT in other contexts.

摘要

背景

人们对大麻健康风险的误解仍然普遍存在,这表明需要改进公共卫生信息传递,并确定教育计划的有效性。我们的目标是开发一种标准化的问卷来衡量大麻合法化背景下的大麻知识。

方法

使用德尔菲法创建了大麻知识评估工具(CKAT)。医疗保健专业人员、政策制定者、学者、患者和学生的目的抽样作为内容和开发专家。来自开放式反馈的代码的主成分分析指导了项目的开发。完成后,CKAT 在加拿大的四所学校(7 年级和 9 年级)进行了预测试和后测试。分析数据以确定参加大麻教育计划后知识分数是否发生变化。

结果

最初有 24 名专家参加了德尔菲过程,18 名(75%保留率)继续参加。主成分分析确定了 3 个领域:1)大麻对个人的影响,2)大麻的一般信息,3)大麻减少伤害。最终问卷由 16 个多项真假题组成(共 64 个项目),Flesch-Kincaid 年级水平为 6.3,SMOG 指数得分为 7.6。132 名学生完成了 CKAT,73 名 7 年级学生和 59 名 9 年级学生。基线平均 CKAT 得分为 46.2(SD:5.5),参加大麻教育计划后增加到 50.7(SD:4.6)(p<0.05)。

结论

开发了一种测量大麻知识的新工具,并在 7 年级和 9 年级学生中进行了试点。需要进一步的研究来测试 CKAT 在其他环境中的可用性和有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/401c/10473536/f063dfe8fedd/pone.0291113.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/401c/10473536/f063dfe8fedd/pone.0291113.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/401c/10473536/f063dfe8fedd/pone.0291113.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The development of a Cannabis Knowledge Assessment Tool (CKAT).《大麻知识评估工具(CKAT)的开发》。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 1;18(9):e0291113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291113. eCollection 2023.
2
Construct validity and reliability of the Concussion Knowledge Assessment Tool (CKAT).脑震荡知识评估工具(CKAT)的结构效度和信度。
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2020 Dec;64(3):201-213.
3
Development of the REACH (Real Education About Cannabis and Health) Program for Canadian Youth.加拿大青年大麻与健康真实教育(REACH)项目的开发。
J Nurs Educ. 2020 Aug 1;59(8):465-469. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20200723-09.
4
A systematic review of medical students' and professionals' attitudes and knowledge regarding medical cannabis.对医学生和专业人士关于医用大麻的态度及知识的系统综述。
J Cannabis Res. 2021 Oct 12;3(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s42238-021-00100-1.
5
How should policymakers regulate the tetrahydrocannabinol content of cannabis products in a legal market?政策制定者应如何在合法市场中监管大麻产品的四氢大麻酚含量?
Addiction. 2023 Jun;118(6):998-1003. doi: 10.1111/add.16135. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
6
Identification of cannabinoids in post-mortem blood samples from the province of New Brunswick before and after recreational cannabis legalization.新不伦瑞克省休闲大麻合法化前后尸检血样中大麻素的鉴定。
Int J Drug Policy. 2022 May;103:103629. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103629. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
7
Lessons from 20 years of medical cannabis use in Canada.加拿大 20 年医用大麻使用经验教训。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 23;18(3):e0271079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271079. eCollection 2023.
8
Student perceptions of cannabis use.学生对大麻使用的看法。
J Am Coll Health. 2023 May-Jun;71(4):1003-1017. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2021.1910272. Epub 2021 May 10.
9
Assessment of Medical Cannabis and Health-Related Quality of Life.评估医用大麻与健康相关的生活质量。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2312522. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.12522.
10
Recreational Cannabis Use: Regulatory Aspects, Public Opinion and Concerns for Public Health.娱乐用大麻的使用:监管方面、公众意见和对公共健康的关注。
Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2023;24(6):728-740. doi: 10.2174/1389201023666220820160602.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a cannabis health literacy questionnaire: preliminary validation using the Rasch model.大麻健康素养问卷的编制:基于拉施模型的初步验证
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 24;25(1):2539. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23770-5.
2
CANN2021 survey and registry-linkages cohort on cannabis involvement among Norwegian high school students: design, measures and sample characteristics - cohort profile.2021年挪威高中生大麻使用情况调查与登记关联队列研究:设计、测量方法及样本特征——队列简介
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 22;15(7):e092475. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092475.
3
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Cross-Sectional Study of Visible Minority Canadian Communities.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in Emergency Department Visits for Cannabis Hyperemesis Syndrome Following Recreational Cannabis Legalization and Subsequent Commercialization in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省娱乐用大麻合法化及随后商业化后,急诊科大麻过度使用综合征就诊人次的变化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2231937. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31937.
2
Perceptions of the health risks of cannabis: estimates from national surveys in Canada and the United States, 2018-2019.对大麻健康风险的认知:2018-2019 年加拿大和美国全国调查的估计。
Health Educ Res. 2022 Mar 24;37(2):61-78. doi: 10.1093/her/cyac006.
3
The association between recreational cannabis legalization, commercialization and cannabis-attributable emergency department visits in Ontario, Canada: an interrupted time-series analysis.
COVID-19疫苗犹豫:加拿大少数族裔社区的横断面研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Feb 24;13(3):228. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13030228.
加拿大安大略省娱乐用大麻合法化、商业化与因大麻就诊的急诊科人次之间的关联:一项中断时间序列分析
Addiction. 2022 Jul;117(7):1952-1960. doi: 10.1111/add.15834. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
4
Cannabis Legalization and Detection of Tetrahydrocannabinol in Injured Drivers.大麻合法化与事故驾车者体内四氢大麻酚的检测。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jan 13;386(2):148-156. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa2109371.
5
Emergency Department Pediatric Visits in Alberta for Cannabis After Legalization.艾伯塔省大麻合法化后,急诊科儿科就诊人数增加。
Pediatrics. 2021 Oct;148(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-045922. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
6
Youth Cannabis use and Legalization in Canada - Reconsidering the Fears, Myths and Facts Three Years In.加拿大青少年使用大麻与大麻合法化——三年后对恐惧、误解和事实的重新审视
J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;30(3):191-196. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
7
Development of the REACH (Real Education About Cannabis and Health) Program for Canadian Youth.加拿大青年大麻与健康真实教育(REACH)项目的开发。
J Nurs Educ. 2020 Aug 1;59(8):465-469. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20200723-09.
8
Cannabis health knowledge and risk perceptions among Canadian youth and young adults.加拿大青少年和青年对大麻健康知识和风险认知。
Harm Reduct J. 2020 Aug 3;17(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12954-020-00397-w.
9
Clearing the air: A study of cannabis-related presentations to urban Alberta emergency departments following legalization.净化空气:对大麻合法化后艾伯塔省城市急诊科与大麻相关就诊情况的研究。
CJEM. 2020 Nov;22(6):776-783. doi: 10.1017/cem.2020.384.
10
Demystifying Content Analysis.内容分析法解析
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jan;84(1):7113. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7113.