Rodríguez-Suárez Claudio-Alberto, González-de la Torre Héctor, Hernández-De Luis María-Naira, Fernández-Gutiérrez Domingo-Ángel, Martínez-Alberto Carlos-Enrique, Brito-Brito Pedro-Ruymán
Research Support Unit, Insular Maternal and Child University Hospital Complex, Canary Health Service, 35016 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Nursing Department, Faculty of Healthcare Science, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ULPGC), 35016 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 1;11(17):2449. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11172449.
The decision-making in clinical nursing, regarding diagnoses, interventions and outcomes, can be assessed using standardized language systems such as NANDA International, the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcome Classification; these taxonomies are the most commonly used by nurses in informatized clinical records. The purpose of this review is to synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of the nursing process with standardized terminology using the NANDA International, the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcome Classification in care practice to assess the association between the presence of the related/risk factors and the clinical decision-making about nursing diagnosis, assessing the effectiveness of nursing interventions and health outcomes, and increasing people's satisfaction. A systematic review was carried out in Medline and PreMedline (OvidSP), Embase (Embase-Elsevier), The Cochrane Library (Wiley), CINAHL (EbscoHOST), SCI-EXPANDED, SSCI and Scielo (WOS), LILACS (Health Virtual Library) and SCOPUS (SCOPUS-Elsevier) and included randomized clinical trials as well as quasi-experimental, cohort and case-control studies. Selection and critical appraisal were conducted by two independent reviewers. The certainty of the evidence was assessed with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Methodology. A total of 17 studies were included with variability in the level and certainty of evidence. According to the outcomes, 6 studies assessed diagnostic decision-making and 11 assessed improvements in individual health outcomes. No studies assessed improvements in intervention effectiveness or population satisfaction. There is a need to increase studies with rigorous methodologies that address clinical decision-making about nursing diagnoses using NANDA International and individuals' health outcomes using the Nursing Interventions Classification and the Nursing Outcome Classification as well as implementing studies that assess the use of these terminologies for improvements in the effectiveness of nurses' interventions and population satisfaction with the nursing process.
临床护理中关于诊断、干预措施和结果的决策,可以使用诸如国际护理诊断协会(NANDA International)、护理干预分类系统(Nursing Interventions Classification)和护理结果分类系统(Nursing Outcome Classification)等标准化语言系统进行评估;这些分类法是护士在信息化临床记录中最常用的。本综述的目的是综合证据,以探讨在护理实践中使用国际护理诊断协会、护理干预分类系统和护理结果分类系统的标准化术语的护理程序的有效性,以评估相关/风险因素的存在与护理诊断的临床决策之间的关联,评估护理干预措施和健康结果的有效性,并提高人们的满意度。在医学数据库(Medline)和预医学数据库(PreMedline,OvidSP)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase,Embase-Elsevier)、考科蓝图书馆(The Cochrane Library,Wiley)、护理学与健康领域数据库(CINAHL,EbscoHOST)、科学引文索引扩展版(SCI-EXPANDED)、社会科学引文索引(SSCI)和科学电子期刊数据库(Scielo,WOS)、拉丁美洲及加勒比地区健康科学文献数据库(LILACS,Health Virtual Library)和Scopus数据库(SCOPUS-Elsevier)中进行了系统综述,纳入了随机临床试验以及准实验研究、队列研究和病例对照研究。由两名独立的评审员进行筛选和批判性评价。使用推荐分级评估、制定和评价方法(Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Methodology)对证据的确定性进行评估。共纳入17项研究,证据水平和确定性存在差异。根据结果,6项研究评估了诊断决策,11项研究评估了个体健康结果的改善情况。没有研究评估干预措施有效性或人群满意度的改善情况。需要增加采用严谨方法的研究,这些研究要使用国际护理诊断协会来解决关于护理诊断的临床决策问题,使用护理干预分类系统和护理结果分类系统来解决个体健康结果问题,同时开展评估这些术语在提高护士干预措施有效性和人群对护理程序满意度方面应用情况的研究。