Linton Sabriya, Cruz Angie Lisbeth, Arnold Kimberly
Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health; 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, Atlanta, USA.
Department of Health Policy; Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
J Soc Serv Res. 2023;49(4):494-509. doi: 10.1080/01488376.2023.2237517. Epub 2023 Jul 21.
Service providers' perspectives on, and responses to the health and social impacts of gentrification have been underexplored. This study's objectives were to assess health and social service providers' perspectives on the causes and impacts of gentrification and their responses to gentrification's impacts. Qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted with 15 service providers sampled using maximum variation and snowball sampling, in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A. Inductive thematic analysis was used. Providers characterized gentrification as increases in community-level social and economic advantage and displacement of Black and Brown people. Neighborhood divestment and speculative development were reported determinants of gentrification. Revitalization and economic growth were reported positive effects of gentrification; negative ramifications included inflated housing costs, residential displacement, and reduced access to health and social services. Providers enacted multiple solutions to mitigate the negative consequences they observed, including educating residents on housing rights and collaborating with other organizations to expand outreach to displaced residents. Service providers are integral to contributing to knowledge on the causes and impacts of gentrification, and absolving problems resulting from gentrification. . Additional research documenting service provider's responses to the impacts of gentrification are needed to inform how future community development strategies are developed to create more benefits than harms.
服务提供者对绅士化的健康和社会影响的看法及应对措施尚未得到充分探讨。本研究的目的是评估健康和社会服务提供者对绅士化的成因及影响的看法,以及他们对绅士化影响的应对措施。在美国佐治亚州亚特兰大,对15名采用最大变异抽样和滚雪球抽样方法选取的服务提供者进行了定性深入访谈。采用归纳主题分析法。提供者将绅士化描述为社区层面社会和经济优势的增加以及黑人和棕色人种的流离失所。邻里撤资和投机性开发被报告为绅士化的决定因素。振兴和经济增长被报告为绅士化的积极影响;负面影响包括住房成本上涨、居民流离失所以及获得健康和社会服务的机会减少。提供者采取了多种解决方案来减轻他们所观察到的负面后果,包括向居民宣传住房权利,并与其他组织合作,扩大对流离失所居民的外展服务。服务提供者对于增进对绅士化的成因及影响的了解以及解决绅士化带来的问题不可或缺。需要更多记录服务提供者对绅士化影响的应对措施的研究,以为未来社区发展战略的制定提供参考,使其创造的益处多于危害。