• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两个臭名昭著的节点:对两侧对称动物和胎盘哺乳动物的松弛分子钟年龄估计的批判性考察。

Two Notorious Nodes: A Critical Examination of Relaxed Molecular Clock Age Estimates of the Bilaterian Animals and Placental Mammals.

机构信息

Department of Earth Sciences, Palaeobiology Programme, Uppsala University, Villavägen 16 SE 75236, Sweden.

Department of Statistics, School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.

出版信息

Syst Biol. 2024 May 27;73(1):223-234. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syad057.

DOI:10.1093/sysbio/syad057
PMID:37695319
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11129587/
Abstract

The popularity of relaxed clock Bayesian inference of clade origin timings has generated several recent publications with focal results considerably older than the fossils of the clades in question. Here, we critically examine two such clades: the animals (with a focus on the bilaterians) and the mammals (with a focus on the placentals). Each example displays a set of characteristic pathologies which, although much commented on, are rarely corrected for. We conclude that in neither case does the molecular clock analysis provide any evidence for an origin of the clade deeper than what is suggested by the fossil record. In addition, both these clades have other features (including, in the case of the placental mammals, proximity to a large mass extinction) that allow us to generate precise expectations of the timings of their origins. Thus, in these instances, the fossil record can provide a powerful test of molecular clock methodology, and why it goes astray, and we have every reason to think these problems are general. [Cambrian explosion; mammalian evolution; molecular clocks.].

摘要

支序起源时间的宽松时钟贝叶斯推断方法日益流行,由此产生了一些新的研究成果,这些研究的焦点结果都比所研究的支序的化石要古老得多。在这里,我们批判性地检查了两个这样的支序:动物(以两侧对称动物为重点)和哺乳动物(以胎盘哺乳动物为重点)。每个例子都显示出一组特征性病变,尽管这些病变经常被提及,但很少得到纠正。我们的结论是,在这两种情况下,分子钟分析都没有为支序的起源提供比化石记录所暗示的更深的证据。此外,这两个支序还有其他特征(包括,在胎盘哺乳动物的情况下,接近大灭绝事件),这些特征使我们能够对它们起源的时间产生精确的预期。因此,在这些情况下,化石记录可以为分子钟方法提供有力的检验,以及为什么它会偏离,我们有充分的理由认为这些问题是普遍存在的。[寒武纪大爆发;哺乳动物进化;分子钟。]。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f5/11129587/13fd6c238330/syad057_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f5/11129587/58b9e7c16326/syad057_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f5/11129587/608f0df47769/syad057_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f5/11129587/854f223e9d21/syad057_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f5/11129587/76f09aca2c52/syad057_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f5/11129587/5f33741c0296/syad057_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f5/11129587/13fd6c238330/syad057_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f5/11129587/58b9e7c16326/syad057_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f5/11129587/608f0df47769/syad057_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f5/11129587/854f223e9d21/syad057_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f5/11129587/76f09aca2c52/syad057_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f5/11129587/5f33741c0296/syad057_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/00f5/11129587/13fd6c238330/syad057_fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
Two Notorious Nodes: A Critical Examination of Relaxed Molecular Clock Age Estimates of the Bilaterian Animals and Placental Mammals.两个臭名昭著的节点:对两侧对称动物和胎盘哺乳动物的松弛分子钟年龄估计的批判性考察。
Syst Biol. 2024 May 27;73(1):223-234. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syad057.
2
A timescale for placental mammal diversification based on Bayesian modeling of the fossil record.基于化石记录的贝叶斯建模的胎盘哺乳动物多样化时间表。
Curr Biol. 2023 Aug 7;33(15):3073-3082.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.06.016. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
3
Ancient dates or accelerated rates? Morphological clocks and the antiquity of placental mammals.古老的年代还是加速的速率?形态钟与胎盘哺乳动物的古老性
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Oct 22;281(1793). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1278.
4
A mixed relaxed clock model.一种混合松弛时钟模型。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Jul 19;371(1699). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0132.
5
Phylogenomic datasets provide both precision and accuracy in estimating the timescale of placental mammal phylogeny.系统基因组数据集在估计胎盘哺乳动物系统发育的时间尺度方面提供了精确性和准确性。
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Sep 7;279(1742):3491-500. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.0683. Epub 2012 May 23.
6
The origin of the animals and a 'Savannah' hypothesis for early bilaterian evolution.动物的起源和早期两侧对称动物进化的“热带草原”假说。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Feb;92(1):446-473. doi: 10.1111/brv.12239. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
7
Dating placentalia: Morphological clocks fail to close the molecular fossil gap.确定胎盘类动物的年代:形态学时钟无法弥合分子化石差距。
Evolution. 2016 Apr;70(4):873-86. doi: 10.1111/evo.12907. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
8
A species-level timeline of mammal evolution integrating phylogenomic data.整合系统发育组学数据的哺乳动物进化物种水平时间线。
Nature. 2022 Feb;602(7896):263-267. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04341-1. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
9
Multiple morphological clocks and total-evidence tip-dating in mammals.哺乳动物中的多个形态钟和全证据末端定年法
Biol Lett. 2016 Jul;12(7). doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0033.
10
Strong mitochondrial DNA support for a Cretaceous origin of modern avian lineages.线粒体DNA有力支持现代鸟类谱系起源于白垩纪。
BMC Biol. 2008 Jan 28;6:6. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-6-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Uncertainty in the timing of diversification of flowering plants rests with equivocal interpretation of their fossil record.开花植物多样化时间的不确定性在于对其化石记录的模棱两可的解释。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 May 28;12(5):242158. doi: 10.1098/rsos.242158. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Phylogenomics establishes an Early Miocene reconstruction of reef vertebrate diversity.系统发育基因组学确立了中新世早期珊瑚礁脊椎动物多样性的重建。
Sci Adv. 2025 May 9;11(19):eadu6149. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adu6149. Epub 2025 May 7.
3
New insights on angiosperm crown age based on Bayesian node dating and skyline fossilized birth-death approaches.

本文引用的文献

1
What is the age of flowering plants?开花植物的年龄是多少?
J Exp Bot. 2022 Jun 24;73(12):3840-3853. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac130.
2
Paleozoic origins of cheilostome bryozoans and their parental care inferred by a new genome-skimmed phylogeny.通过新的简化基因组系统发育推断唇口目苔藓虫的古生代起源及其亲代抚育行为
Sci Adv. 2022 Apr;8(13):eabm7452. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abm7452. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
3
Integrated phylogenomics and fossil data illuminate the evolution of beetles.整合系统发育基因组学和化石数据揭示了甲虫的进化历程。
基于贝叶斯节点定年法和天际线化石出生-死亡法对被子植物冠龄的新见解。
Nat Commun. 2025 Mar 7;16(1):2265. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57687-9.
4
Ediacaran origin and Ediacaran-Cambrian diversification of Metazoa.后生动物的埃迪卡拉起源和埃迪卡拉纪-寒武纪多样化。
Sci Adv. 2024 Nov 15;10(46):eadp7161. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adp7161. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
5
Noise leads to the perceived increase in evolutionary rates over short time scales.噪声导致在短时间尺度上感知到进化率的增加。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Sep 13;20(9):e1012458. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012458. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
Proterozoic microfossils continue to provide new insights into the rise of complex eukaryotic life.元古代微化石继续为复杂真核生物生命的兴起提供新的见解。
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Aug 21;11(7):240154. doi: 10.1098/rsos.240154. eCollection 2024 Aug.
7
Genes are often uninformative for dating species' origins.基因对于确定物种起源往往并无助益。
Nature. 2023 Dec;624(7990):51-52. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-03487-4.
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 Mar 23;9(3):211771. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211771. eCollection 2022 Mar.
4
Phylogenomic analyses of echinoid diversification prompt a re-evaluation of their fossil record.系统发生基因组分析促使人们重新评估海胆类的化石记录。
Elife. 2022 Mar 22;11:e72460. doi: 10.7554/eLife.72460.
5
An estimate of the deepest branches of the tree of life from ancient vertically evolving genes.从古老的垂直进化基因估计生命之树的最深分支。
Elife. 2022 Feb 22;11:e66695. doi: 10.7554/eLife.66695.
6
A species-level timeline of mammal evolution integrating phylogenomic data.整合系统发育组学数据的哺乳动物进化物种水平时间线。
Nature. 2022 Feb;602(7896):263-267. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04341-1. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
7
Possible poriferan body fossils in early Neoproterozoic microbial reefs.可能存在于早新元古代微生物礁中的多孔动物体化石。
Nature. 2021 Aug;596(7870):87-91. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03773-z. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
8
Survival and selection biases in early animal evolution and a source of systematic overestimation in molecular clocks.早期动物进化中的生存与选择偏差以及分子钟系统性高估的一个来源。
Interface Focus. 2020 Aug 6;10(4):20190110. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2019.0110. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
9
The dynamics of stem and crown groups.茎和冠群的动态。
Sci Adv. 2020 Feb 19;6(8):eaaz1626. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz1626. eCollection 2020 Feb.
10
Using the Fossil Record to Evaluate Timetree Timescales.利用化石记录评估时间树的时间尺度。
Front Genet. 2019 Nov 12;10:1049. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01049. eCollection 2019.