Human and Evolutionary Biology Section, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
Department of Anthropology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
JAMA. 2023 Sep 12;330(10):934-940. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.15231.
Sedentary behavior is associated with cardiometabolic disease and mortality, but its association with dementia is unclear.
To investigate whether accelerometer-assessed sedentary behavior is associated with incident dementia.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective study of prospectively collected data from the UK Biobank including 49 841 adults aged 60 years or older without a diagnosis of dementia at the time of wearing the wrist accelerometer and living in England, Scotland, or Wales. Follow-up began at the time of wearing the accelerometer (February 2013 to December 2015) and continued until September 2021 in England, July 2021 in Scotland, and February 2018 in Wales.
Mean daily sedentary behavior time (included in the primary analysis) and mean daily sedentary bout length, maximum daily sedentary bout length, and mean number of daily sedentary bouts (included in the secondary analyses) were derived from a machine learning-based analysis of 1 week of wrist-worn accelerometer data.
Incident all-cause dementia diagnosis from inpatient hospital records and death registry data. Cox proportional hazard models with linear and cubic spline terms were used to assess associations.
A total of 49 841 older adults (mean age, 67.19 [SD, 4.29] years; 54.7% were female) were followed up for a mean of 6.72 years (SD, 0.95 years). During this time, 414 individuals were diagnosed with incident all-cause dementia. In the fully adjusted models, there was a significant nonlinear association between time spent in sedentary behavior and incident dementia. Relative to a median of 9.27 hours/d for sedentary behavior, the hazard ratios (HRs) for dementia were 1.08 (95% CI, 1.04-1.12, P < .001) for 10 hours/d, 1.63 (95% CI, 1.35-1.97, P < .001) for 12 hours/d, and 3.21 (95% CI, 2.05-5.04, P < .001) for 15 hours/d. The adjusted incidence rate of dementia per 1000 person-years was 7.49 (95% CI, 7.48-7.49) for 9.27 hours/d of sedentary behavior, 8.06 (95% CI, 7.76-8.36) for 10 hours/d, 12.00 (95% CI, 10.00-14.36) for 12 hours/d, and 22.74 (95% CI, 14.92-34.11) for 15 hours/d. Mean daily sedentary bout length (HR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.03-2.27], P = .04 and 0.65 [95% CI, 0.04-1.57] more dementia cases per 1000 person-years for a 1-hour increase from the mean of 0.48 hours) and maximum daily sedentary bout length (HR, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.02-1.31], P = .02 and 0.19 [95% CI, 0.02-0.38] more dementia cases per 1000 person-years for a 1-hour increase from the mean of 1.95 hours) were significantly associated with higher risk of incident dementia. The number of sedentary bouts per day was not associated with higher risk of incident dementia (HR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.99-1.01], P = .89). In the sensitivity analyses, after adjustment for time spent in sedentary behavior, the mean daily sedentary bout length and the maximum daily sedentary bout length were no longer significantly associated with incident dementia.
Among older adults, more time spent in sedentary behaviors was significantly associated with higher incidence of all-cause dementia. Future research is needed to determine whether the association between sedentary behavior and risk of dementia is causal.
久坐行为与心血管代谢疾病和死亡率有关,但与痴呆的关系尚不清楚。
研究加速度计评估的久坐行为与痴呆症发病的关系。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项回顾性研究,对来自英国生物库的前瞻性收集的数据进行分析,纳入了 49841 名年龄在 60 岁及以上、佩戴腕部加速度计时无痴呆症诊断且居住在英格兰、苏格兰或威尔士的成年人。随访从佩戴加速度计开始(2013 年 2 月至 2015 年 12 月),并在英格兰继续至 2021 年 7 月,在苏格兰继续至 2021 年 7 月,在威尔士继续至 2018 年 2 月。
平均每日久坐时间(主要分析纳入)以及平均每日久坐时间、最大每日久坐时间和平均每日久坐次数(次要分析纳入),均来源于对 1 周腕部佩戴加速度计数据的基于机器学习的分析。
从住院记录和死亡登记数据中诊断出所有原因的痴呆症。使用线性和三次样条术语的 Cox 比例风险模型来评估关联。
共有 49841 名年龄较大的成年人(平均年龄 67.19 [标准差 4.29] 岁;54.7%为女性)的平均随访时间为 6.72 年(标准差 0.95 年)。在此期间,有 414 人被诊断为新发的所有原因痴呆症。在完全调整的模型中,久坐行为时间与痴呆症发病之间存在显著的非线性关联。与久坐行为中位数 9.27 小时/天相比,痴呆症的风险比(HR)分别为 10 小时/天(95%CI,1.04-1.12,P<0.001)、12 小时/天(95%CI,1.35-1.97,P<0.001)和 15 小时/天(95%CI,2.05-5.04,P<0.001)。每 1000 人年的调整后痴呆症发生率为 9.27 小时/天的 7.49(95%CI,7.48-7.49)、10 小时/天的 8.06(95%CI,7.76-8.36)、12 小时/天的 12.00(95%CI,10.00-14.36)和 15 小时/天的 22.74(95%CI,14.92-34.11)。平均每日久坐时间(HR,1.53 [95%CI,1.03-2.27],P=0.04 和每 1000 人年增加 1 小时会增加 0.65 [95%CI,0.04-1.57] 个痴呆症病例)和最大每日久坐时间(HR,1.15 [95%CI,1.02-1.31],P=0.02 和每 1000 人年增加 1 小时会增加 0.19 [95%CI,0.02-0.38] 个痴呆症病例)与更高的痴呆症发病风险显著相关。每天久坐次数与痴呆症发病风险增加无关(HR,1.00 [95%CI,0.99-1.01],P=0.89)。在敏感性分析中,在调整久坐行为时间后,平均每日久坐时间和最大每日久坐时间与痴呆症的发生不再显著相关。
在老年人中,久坐时间与全因痴呆症的发病率增加显著相关。需要进一步的研究来确定久坐行为与痴呆症风险之间的关联是否具有因果关系。