• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为什么不同的甘蔗品种对黑穗病表现出不同的抗性?:不同抗黑穗病甘蔗品种茎内生微生物组成和代谢功能的比较。

Why different sugarcane cultivars show different resistant abilities to smut? : Comparisons of endophytic microbial compositions and metabolic functions in stems of sugarcane cultivars with different abilities to resist smut.

机构信息

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment and Agro-Product Safety, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Plant Science Education, Agricultural College, Guangxi University, 100 University Road, Nanning, Guangxi, 530004, P.R. China.

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Sugarcane Genetic Improvement, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 530007, Guangxi, P.R. China.

出版信息

BMC Plant Biol. 2023 Sep 14;23(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04446-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12870-023-04446-x
PMID:37710150
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10500793/
Abstract

To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the resistance to smut of different sugarcane cultivars, endophytic bacterial and fungal compositions, functions and metabolites in the stems of the sugarcane cultivars were analyzed using high-throughput sequencing techniques and nontargeted metabolomics. The results showed that the levels of ethylene, salicylic acid and jasmonic acid in sugarcane varieties that were not sensitive to smut were all higher than those in sensitive sugarcane varieties. Moreover, endophytic fungi, such as Ramichloridium, Alternaria, Sarocladium, Epicoccum, and Exophiala species, could be considered antagonistic to sugarcane smut. Additionally, the highly active arginine and proline metabolism, pentose phosphate pathway, phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, and tyrosine metabolism in sugarcane varieties that were not sensitive to smut indicated that these pathways contribute to resistance to smut. All of the above results suggested that the relatively highly abundant antagonistic microbes and highly active metabolic functions of endophytes in non-smut-sensitive sugarcane cultivars were important for their relatively high resistance to smut.

摘要

为了阐明不同甘蔗品种对黑穗病抗性的机制,本研究采用高通量测序技术和非靶向代谢组学方法分析了甘蔗品种茎内的内生细菌和真菌组成、功能和代谢物。结果表明,对黑穗病不敏感的甘蔗品种的乙烯、水杨酸和茉莉酸水平均高于敏感甘蔗品种。此外,内生真菌如拟盘多毛孢属、链格孢属、层出镰刀菌属、匐柄霉属和外瓶霉属等可被视为甘蔗黑穗病的拮抗真菌。此外,对黑穗病不敏感的甘蔗品种中具有较高活性的精氨酸和脯氨酸代谢、戊糖磷酸途径、苯丙素生物合成和酪氨酸代谢途径表明,这些途径有助于抵抗黑穗病。上述结果表明,非黑穗病敏感甘蔗品种中相对丰富的拮抗微生物和内生菌的高活性代谢功能对其较高的黑穗病抗性至关重要。

相似文献

1
Why different sugarcane cultivars show different resistant abilities to smut? : Comparisons of endophytic microbial compositions and metabolic functions in stems of sugarcane cultivars with different abilities to resist smut.为什么不同的甘蔗品种对黑穗病表现出不同的抗性?:不同抗黑穗病甘蔗品种茎内生微生物组成和代谢功能的比较。
BMC Plant Biol. 2023 Sep 14;23(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04446-x.
2
Genome survey of resistance gene analogs in sugarcane: genomic features and differential expression of the innate immune system from a smut-resistant genotype.甘蔗中抗病基因类似物的基因组调查:来自抗黑穗病基因型的基因组特征和先天免疫系统的差异表达
BMC Genomics. 2019 Nov 6;20(1):809. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6207-y.
3
Impact of Sporisorium scitamineum infection on the qualitative traits of commercial cultivars and advanced lines of sugarcane.感染盾蚧对甘蔗商业品种和优良品系质量性状的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 May 23;17(5):e0268781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268781. eCollection 2022.
4
A dynamic degradome landscape on miRNAs and their predicted targets in sugarcane caused by Sporisorium scitamineum stress.由蔗灰霉病菌引起的甘蔗 microRNA 及其预测靶标动态降解组图谱。
BMC Genomics. 2019 Jan 18;20(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5400-8.
5
Transcriptional analysis identifies major pathways as response components to Sporisorium scitamineum stress in sugarcane.转录分析确定主要途径作为甘蔗对盾叶薯蓣压力的反应成分。
Gene. 2018 Dec 15;678:207-218. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2018.08.043. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
6
Global Responses of Autopolyploid Sugarcane Badila ( L.) to Drought Stress Based on Comparative Transcriptome and Metabolome Profiling.基于比较转录组和代谢组分析的自交多倍体甘蔗 Badila(L.)对干旱胁迫的全球响应。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Feb 14;24(4):3856. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043856.
7
Assessment of the rhizosphere fungi and bacteria recruited by sugarcane during smut invasion.甘蔗腥黑穗病菌侵染过程中被招募的根际真菌和细菌的评估。
Braz J Microbiol. 2023 Mar;54(1):385-395. doi: 10.1007/s42770-022-00871-6. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
8
Differential expression of SofDIR16 and SofCAD genes in smut resistant and susceptible sugarcane cultivars in response to Sporisorium scitamineum.SofDIR16 和 SofCAD 基因在抗黑穗病菌和感黑穗病菌甘蔗品种中的差异表达对盾斑病菌的响应。
J Plant Physiol. 2018 Jul;226:103-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2018.04.016. Epub 2018 May 4.
9
Screening of sugarcane germplasm against Sporisorium scitamineum and its effects on setts germination and tillering.甘蔗种质对盾蚧的筛选及其对种薯萌发和分蘖的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 25;14(1):14653. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64810-1.
10
Cytogenetic Characterization and Metabolomic Differences of Full-Sib Progenies of spp.某物种全同胞后代的细胞遗传学特征及代谢组学差异
Plants (Basel). 2023 Feb 10;12(4):810. doi: 10.3390/plants12040810.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Soil Microbial Composition in Rhizospheres Between Wilt Disease-Resistant and Susceptible Melon Varieties.甜瓜抗枯萎病品种与感病品种根际土壤微生物组成的比较
Microorganisms. 2025 Feb 18;13(2):444. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13020444.
2
The response of rhubarb to smut infection is revealed through a comparative transcriptome and metabolome study.大黄对黑粉病感染的反应是通过比较转录组和代谢组学研究揭示的。
Planta. 2023 Dec 19;259(1):27. doi: 10.1007/s00425-023-04306-w.

本文引用的文献

1
KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes.KEGG 用于基于分类的途径和基因组分析。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2023 Jan 6;51(D1):D587-D592. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac963.
2
Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms.为了理解细胞生物的起源和进化。
Protein Sci. 2019 Nov;28(11):1947-1951. doi: 10.1002/pro.3715. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
3
KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes.京都基因与基因组百科全书(KEGG)
Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):27-30. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27.
4
The promoter of the plant defensin gene PDF1.2 from Arabidopsis is systemically activated by fungal pathogens and responds to methyl jasmonate but not to salicylic acid.拟南芥植物防御素基因PDF1.2的启动子可被真菌病原体系统激活,并对茉莉酸甲酯有反应,但对水杨酸无反应。
Plant Mol Biol. 1998 Dec;38(6):1071-80. doi: 10.1023/a:1006070413843.