• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情感神经科学人格量表简版:葡萄牙语欧洲社区样本中的初步心理测量特性

Brief Form of the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales: Preliminary Psychometric Properties in a European Portuguese Community Sample.

作者信息

Faustino Bruno, Fonseca Isabel, Oliveira Jorge

机构信息

HEI-Lab: Digital Human-Environment Interaction Labs, Lusófona University, Portugal; Faculdade de Psicologia da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

Faculdade de Psicologia da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

Psychol Rep. 2023 Sep 21:332941231202016. doi: 10.1177/00332941231202016.

DOI:10.1177/00332941231202016
PMID:37732823
Abstract

Personality theory based on affective neuroscience research suggests the presence of seven affective neurobiological systems. These dimensions have been identified using psychometric instruments such as the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales (ANPS) and its brief version known as the Brief Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales (BANPS). Despite being a psychometric valid instrument, the BANPS was not adapted to European Portuguese. This study describes a psychometric analysis of the BANPS in a Portuguese population sample. A European Portuguese-speaking sample was recruited ( = 355, Mage = 27.31, DP = 12.75). Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to confirm the BANPS factorial structure. Pearson correlations were used to explore convergent validity with self-reports for psychological distress and psychopathology. Six factor model was confirmed with adequate goodness-of-fit indices (χ2(449) = 808,9841, TLI = .90, CFI = .92, RMSEA = .048 (.042-.053). Non-agreeable affective systems (anger, fear, distress), correlated positively with psychological distress and symptomology, while play and care systems correlated negatively. Seek and care subscales showed the weakest psychometric properties. The original factor structure was confirmed, suggesting the BANPS may be a valid measure to assess affective behavioral traits in the Portuguese population. Further studies in clinical populations may improve the psychometric data of the BANPS.

摘要

基于情感神经科学研究的人格理论表明存在七种情感神经生物学系统。这些维度已通过心理测量工具得以确定,如情感神经科学人格量表(ANPS)及其简版,即简版情感神经科学人格量表(BANPS)。尽管BANPS是一种心理测量有效的工具,但它并未针对欧洲葡萄牙语进行改编。本研究描述了对葡萄牙人群样本中BANPS的心理测量分析。招募了一个讲欧洲葡萄牙语的样本(n = 355,年龄均值 = 27.31,标准差 = 12.75)。验证性因素分析(CFA)用于确认BANPS的因素结构。皮尔逊相关性用于探索与心理困扰和精神病理学自我报告的收敛效度。六因素模型得到确认,拟合优度指标良好(χ2(449) = 808.9841,TLI = 0.90,CFI = 0.92,RMSEA = 0.048(0.042 - 0.053))。不愉悦情感系统(愤怒、恐惧、困扰)与心理困扰和症状呈正相关,而玩耍和关爱系统呈负相关。寻求和关爱子量表显示出最弱的心理测量特性。原始因素结构得到确认,表明BANPS可能是评估葡萄牙人群情感行为特征的有效测量工具。对临床人群的进一步研究可能会改善BANPS的心理测量数据。

相似文献

1
Brief Form of the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales: Preliminary Psychometric Properties in a European Portuguese Community Sample.情感神经科学人格量表简版:葡萄牙语欧洲社区样本中的初步心理测量特性
Psychol Rep. 2023 Sep 21:332941231202016. doi: 10.1177/00332941231202016.
2
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
3
Empowerment in primary care and psychiatric settings: a psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the empowerment scale.初级保健和精神科环境中的赋权:赋权量表瑞典语版本的心理测量评估
BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 13;13(1):909. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03123-y.
4
Level of personality functioning scale-brief form 2.0: validity and reliability of the Chinese version.人格功能水平量表简版2.0:中文版的效度与信度
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):640. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07081-y.
5
Assessing the psychometric properties and validating the Portuguese version of the INSPIRE measure of staff support for personal recovery in Portugal.评估葡萄牙版INSPIRE员工支持个人康复量表的心理测量特性并进行效度验证。
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):636. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-07060-3.
6
A Psychometric Evaluation of the Staff-Reported EOLD-CAD Measure Among Nursing Home Residents With Cognitive Impairment.针对认知障碍养老院居民的员工报告的EOLD-CAD测量方法的心理测量学评估
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2025 Jan;40(1):e70037. doi: 10.1002/gps.70037.
7
Evaluation of Psychometric Properties of the Farsi Version of the Work-Related Affective Feelings Scale.工作相关情感量表波斯语版本的心理测量特性评估
Psychol Russ. 2025 Jun 1;18(2):58-76. doi: 10.11621/pir.2025.0204. eCollection 2025.
8
Psychometric validation and measurement invariance of the self-compassion scale-short form (SCS-SF) across gender, clinical population, and cultures.自我同情量表简版(SCS-SF)在性别、临床人群和不同文化间的心理测量学验证及测量不变性
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 1;13(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03070-8.
9
Brief resilience scale (BRS) in a sample of Indian college students: evidence of psychometric properties.印度大学生样本中的简易复原力量表(BRS):心理测量特性的证据
BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 6;13(1):875. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03234-6.
10
A brief form of the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales.情感神经科学人格量表的简式版。
Psychol Assess. 2013 Sep;25(3):826-43. doi: 10.1037/a0032576. Epub 2013 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Affective neuroscience correlates of personality and the formation of early maladaptive schemas - preliminary reports.人格与早期适应不良图式形成的情感神经科学关联——初步报告。
Postep Psychiatr Neurol. 2024 Dec;33(4):213-221. doi: 10.5114/ppn.2024.147098. Epub 2025 Feb 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Neurocognition applied to psychotherapy: A brief theoretical proposal based on the complex neural network perspective.神经认知在心理治疗中的应用:基于复杂神经网络观点的简要理论建议。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2022 Nov-Dec;29(6):1626-1633. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2021.1883615. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
2
Affective Neuroscience Theory and Personality: An Update.情感神经科学理论与人格:最新进展
Personal Neurosci. 2018 Aug 10;1:e12. doi: 10.1017/pen.2018.10. eCollection 2018.
3
Selected Principles of Pankseppian Affective Neuroscience.潘克塞普情感神经科学的选定原则
Front Neurosci. 2019 Jan 17;12:1025. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.01025. eCollection 2018.
4
Validation of the Italian translation of the affective neuroscience personality scales.情感神经科学人格量表意大利语翻译的验证
Psychol Rep. 2015 Feb;116(1):97-115. doi: 10.2466/08.09.PR0.116k13w4. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
5
A brief form of the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales.情感神经科学人格量表的简式版。
Psychol Assess. 2013 Sep;25(3):826-43. doi: 10.1037/a0032576. Epub 2013 May 6.
6
Seriousness checks are useful to improve data validity in online research.严重性检查有助于提高在线研究数据的有效性。
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Jun;45(2):527-35. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0265-2.
7
A new approach of personality and psychiatric disorders: a short version of the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales.一种新的人格与精神障碍研究方法:情感神经科学人格量表的简式版。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041489. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
8
Spanish validation of the Affective Neuroscience Personality Scales.情感神经科学人格量表的西班牙语验证。
Span J Psychol. 2011 Nov;14(2):926-35. doi: 10.5209/rev_sjop.2011.v14.n2.38.
9
In search of the neurobiological substrates for social playfulness in mammalian brains.探寻哺乳动物大脑中社交嬉戏的神经生物学基础。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Oct;35(9):1821-30. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.03.006. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
10
The SEEKING mind: primal neuro-affective substrates for appetitive incentive states and their pathological dynamics in addictions and depression.追求型思维:成瘾和抑郁中欲求激励状态的原始神经情感基础及其病理动力学。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Oct;35(9):1805-20. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Mar 15.