Suppr超能文献

四国护士教育者能力的比较横断面研究。

Nurse educator competence in four European countries-A comparative cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Diaconia University of Applied Sciences, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2023 Dec;10(12):7848-7859. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2033. Epub 2023 Oct 18.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this article is to describe and compare the nurse educator competences in four European countries using three different evaluators: nurse educators (n = 329), heads of a nursing subject (n = 60) and student nurses (n = 1058).

DESIGN

The study was conducted as a comparative cross-sectional survey in Finland, Malta, Slovakia and Spain between May 2021 and February 2022.

METHODS

The data were collected with an online survey. The instrument used was a 20-item Tool for Evaluation of Requirements of Nurse Teachers, utilizing a 5-point Likert-type scale. The data were analysed statistically and reported according to STROBE guidelines.

RESULTS

Nurse educators' competence evaluated positively in all the groups of evaluators, with a mean of >3.5. The self-evaluation of nurse educators' competence was higher than the other evaluators' evaluations. Having a degree in nursing, having completed some pedagogical studies and longer work experience as a nurse educator had a positive association with higher self-evaluated competence among nurse educators.

CONCLUSIONS

Nurse educator competence is at a good level in the selected European countries, but further studies are required to find the reasons behind the differences in evaluations.

PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Each participating educational institution named a contact person who distributed the surveys to the participants and returned the study's metadata to the researchers.

摘要

目的

本文旨在描述和比较四个欧洲国家的护士教育者的能力,使用三种不同的评估者:护士教育者(n=329)、护理学科负责人(n=60)和护生(n=1058)。

设计

本研究于 2021 年 5 月至 2022 年 2 月在芬兰、马耳他、斯洛伐克和西班牙进行了一项比较性的横断面调查。

方法

使用在线调查收集数据。使用的工具是 20 项护士教师需求评估工具,采用 5 点 Likert 量表。数据进行了统计分析,并按照 STROBE 指南进行了报告。

结果

在所有评估者群体中,护士教育者的能力都得到了积极评价,平均得分>3.5。护士教育者对自身能力的评价高于其他评估者的评价。具有护理学位、完成了一些教学研究以及作为护士教育者的工作经验较长与护士教育者自我评估的较高能力呈正相关。

结论

在所选择的欧洲国家,护士教育者的能力处于较好的水平,但需要进一步研究以找出评估差异的原因。

公众贡献

每个参与的教育机构指定一名联系人,向参与者分发调查并将研究的元数据返回给研究人员。

相似文献

1
Nurse educator competence in four European countries-A comparative cross-sectional study.
Nurs Open. 2023 Dec;10(12):7848-7859. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2033. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
2
The competence of nurse educators and graduating nurse students.
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104769. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104769. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
4
The competence and the cooperation of nurse educators.
Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Nov;33(11):1376-81. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2012.09.008. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
5
Norwegian nurse educators' self-rating of competencies: a nationwide cross-sectional web-survey.
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2024 Apr 2;21(1). doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2023-0040. eCollection 2024 Jan 1.
8
Fairness and respect in nurse educators' work- nursing students' perceptions.
Nurse Educ Pract. 2017 Mar;23:61-66. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
9
An Instrument to Assess the Digital Competence of Nurse Educators.
Nurse Educ. 2024;49(5):E280-E285. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000001637. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
10
Nurse educators' perceptions of factors related to the competence of graduating nursing students.
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Jun;101:104884. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104884. Epub 2021 Apr 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Instruments assessing nurse educator's competence: A scoping review.
Nurs Open. 2023 Apr;10(4):1985-2002. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1479. Epub 2022 Nov 20.
2
The relationship among educational skills, general self-efficacy perceptions and performance in nursing instructors.
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Dec;107:105129. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105129. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
3
The level of competence of graduating nursing students in 10 European countries-Comparison between countries.
Nurs Open. 2021 May;8(3):1048-1062. doi: 10.1002/nop2.712. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
4
Nursing Faculty Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic Response.
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2021;42(5):285-290. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000843.
5
The competence of nurse educators and graduating nurse students.
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Mar;98:104769. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104769. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
6
Accounting for research fatigue in research ethics.
Bioethics. 2021 Mar;35(3):270-276. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12829. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
7
Relationship of Quality of Life, Resilience, and Associated Factors Among Nursing Faculty During COVID-19.
Nurse Educ. 2021 Jan/Feb;46(1):17-22. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000926.
8
Pedagogical Nursing Practice: Redefining nursing practice for the academic nurse educator.
Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 May;37:105-108. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
9
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.
10
Nursing faculty teaching characteristics as perceived by nursing students: an integrative review.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2020 Mar;34(1):23-33. doi: 10.1111/scs.12711. Epub 2019 May 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验