Silva Hugo, Nakamura Fábio Yuzo, Beato Marco, Marcelino Rui
Research Center in Sports Sciences, Health Sciences and Human Development, CIDESD, CreativeLab Research Community, Vila Real, Portugal.
Department of Sports Sciences and Physical Education, University of Maia, Maia, Portugal.
Sci Med Footb. 2023 Aug;7(3):198-213. doi: 10.1080/24733938.2022.2090600. Epub 2022 Jun 26.
The aim of this review is to summarize the current scientific knowledge about acceleration and deceleration demands during football training.
A systematic search of three electronic databases (PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science) was performed to identify peer-reviewed relevant English-language articles, following PRISMA guidelines.
All acceleration and deceleration data were analyzed and organized into four categories: i) training drills variables (i.e. manipulated drills variables such as number of players in small-sided games), ii) training exercises (i.e. different drills such small games or circuit training), iii) players' positions (i.e. demands for each playing position) and iv) training schedule (i.e. training sessions presented as microcycles, season sections or full season). Full-text articles of 42 studies were included in the final analysis. Players' level included: amateur, youth, semi-professional, professional and elite players. All playing positions were considered, including goalkeepers. Six different global position systems brands were used, with the majority measuring data at 10 Hz. Different thresholds and intensities were used in several papers. Lower acceleration and deceleration intensities occurred more often than higher intensities in all four categories.
Different exercises elicit different demands and small-sided games presented higher acceleration and deceleration demands than circuit training and other running based drills. Furthermore, manipulating drills variables, as reducing or increasing number of players in small-sided games increase or decrease demands, respectively. Additionally, wide playing positions, such as fullbacks, are generally exposed to higher acceleration and deceleration demands. From a planning point of view, acceleration and deceleration demands decrease as match day approaches.
本综述旨在总结当前关于足球训练中加速和减速要求的科学知识。
按照PRISMA指南,对三个电子数据库(PubMed、SPORTDiscus、科学网)进行系统检索,以识别经同行评审的相关英文文章。
所有加速和减速数据均进行了分析,并分为四类:i)训练 drills 变量(即小场地比赛中球员数量等可操控的 drills 变量),ii)训练练习(即小型比赛或循环训练等不同 drills),iii)球员位置(即每个比赛位置的要求)和 iv)训练计划(即作为微周期、赛季阶段或整个赛季呈现的训练课程)。最终分析纳入了42项研究的全文。球员水平包括:业余、青年、半职业、职业和精英球员。考虑了所有比赛位置,包括守门员。使用了六个不同品牌的全球定位系统,大多数以10Hz测量数据。几篇论文使用了不同的阈值和强度。在所有四类中,较低的加速和减速强度比较高的强度出现得更频繁。
不同的练习会产生不同的要求,小场地比赛的加速和减速要求高于循环训练和其他基于跑步的 drills。此外,操控 drills 变量,如减少或增加小场地比赛中的球员数量,会分别增加或减少要求。此外,边后卫等较宽的比赛位置通常面临更高的加速和减速要求。从规划的角度来看,随着比赛日的临近,加速和减速要求会降低。