Suppr超能文献

七种最常用的颈肌张力障碍量表中 91 个肌张力障碍症状的内容重叠。

Content overlap of 91 dystonia symptoms among the seven most commonly used cervical dystonia scales.

机构信息

Department of Adult Psychiatry, Chair of Psychiatry, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.

Students' Scientific Group of Neurology at the Department of Neurology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.

出版信息

Neurol Sci. 2024 Apr;45(4):1507-1514. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-07157-1. Epub 2023 Nov 1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Dystonia is a movement disorder characterized by sustained or intermittent muscle contractions. Cervical dystonia (CD) is the most common focal dystonia. There are several instruments assessing the symptoms of CD. However, different scales assess different features which may lead to poor patient evaluation.

AIM

The aim of the study was to evaluate the degree of overlap of most often used CD rating scales identified by the literature review.

METHODS

A thorough search of the Medline database was conducted in September 2021. Then the frequency of each scale was calculated, and 7 most common scales were included in the content overlap analysis using Jaccard index (0 - no overlap, 1 - full overlap).

RESULTS

Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS), Tsui score, Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS), Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile 58 (CDIP-58), Craniocervical Dystonia Questionnaire 24 (CDQ-24), Cervical Dystonia Severity Rating Scale (CDSS), Cervical Dystonia Severity Rating Scale (DDS) and The Dystonia Non-Motor Symptoms Questionnaire (DNMSQuest) were the most common scales. 91 CD symptoms were distinguished from 134 items used in the scales. The mean overlap among all scales was 0.17. 52 (62%) symptoms were examined by more than one scale. The CIDP-58 captured the highest number of symptoms (63.0%), while the CDSS captured the lowest number (8.0%). None of the symptoms were examined by seven instruments.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a very weak overlap among scales. High inconsistency between the scales may lead to highly different dystonia severity assessment in clinical practice. Thus, the instruments should be combined.

摘要

简介

肌张力障碍是一种以持续性或间歇性肌肉收缩为特征的运动障碍。颈肌张力障碍(CD)是最常见的局灶性肌张力障碍。有几种仪器可以评估 CD 的症状。然而,不同的量表评估不同的特征,这可能导致对患者的评估不佳。

目的

本研究旨在评估通过文献综述确定的最常用 CD 评定量表的重叠程度。

方法

2021 年 9 月对 Medline 数据库进行了彻底搜索。然后计算了每种量表的频率,并使用 Jaccard 指数(0-无重叠,1-完全重叠)对 7 种最常见的量表进行了内容重叠分析。

结果

多伦多西部痉挛性斜颈评定量表(TWSTRS)、Tsui 评分、伯克-法恩-马尔丹肌张力障碍评定量表(BFMDRS)、颈肌张力障碍影响量表 58(CDIP-58)、颅颈肌张力障碍问卷 24(CDQ-24)、颈肌张力障碍严重程度评定量表(CDSS)、颈肌张力障碍严重程度评定量表(DDS)和肌张力障碍非运动症状问卷(DNMSQuest)是最常用的量表。从 134 项量表项目中区分出 91 项 CD 症状。所有量表之间的平均重叠率为 0.17。超过一种量表检查了 52(62%)项症状。CIDP-58 捕捉到的症状最多(63.0%),而 CDSS 捕捉到的症状最少(8.0%)。没有一种症状被七种仪器检查过。

结论

量表之间的重叠非常微弱。量表之间的高度不一致可能导致临床实践中对肌张力障碍严重程度的评估存在很大差异。因此,这些工具应该结合使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a567/10943139/c5643abef362/10072_2023_7157_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验