Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy; Cardiovascular Centre Aalst, Aalst, Belgium; Powerful Medical, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Powerful Medical, Bratislava, Slovakia.
J Electrocardiol. 2024 Jan-Feb;82:147-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2023.12.009. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
The electrocardiogram (ECG) is one of the most accessible and comprehensive diagnostic tools used to assess cardiac patients at the first point of contact. Despite advances in computerized interpretation of the electrocardiogram (CIE), its accuracy remains inferior to physicians. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered ECG system and compared its performance to current state-of-the-art CIE.
An AI-powered system consisting of 6 deep neural networks (DNN) was trained on standard 12‑lead ECGs to detect 20 essential diagnostic patterns (grouped into 6 categories: rhythm, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), conduction abnormalities, ectopy, chamber enlargement and axis). An independent test set of ECGs with diagnostic consensus of two expert cardiologists was used as a reference standard. AI system performance was compared to current state-of-the-art CIE. The key metrics used to compare performances were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1 score.
A total of 932,711 standard 12‑lead ECGs from 173,949 patients were used for AI system development. The independent test set pooled 11,932 annotated ECG labels. In all 6 diagnostic categories, the DNNs achieved high F1 scores: Rhythm 0.957, ACS 0.925, Conduction abnormalities 0.893, Ectopy 0.966, Chamber enlargement 0.972, and Axis 0.897. The diagnostic performance of DNNs surpassed state-of-the-art CIE for the 13 out of 20 essential diagnostic patterns and was non-inferior for the remaining individual diagnoses.
Our results demonstrate the AI-powered ECG model's ability to accurately identify electrocardiographic abnormalities from the 12‑lead ECG, highlighting its potential as a clinical tool for healthcare professionals.
心电图(ECG)是评估首诊心脏患者最便捷、最全面的诊断工具之一。尽管心电图计算机化解读(CIE)取得了进步,但它的准确性仍不如医生。本研究评估了人工智能(AI)驱动的心电图系统的诊断性能,并将其与当前最先进的 CIE 进行了比较。
一个由 6 个深度神经网络(DNN)组成的 AI 系统,对标准的 12 导联心电图进行了训练,以检测 20 种基本诊断模式(分为 6 类:节律、急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)、传导异常、异位、腔室扩大和轴)。一个由两名专家心脏病医生诊断共识的独立 ECG 测试集被用作参考标准。AI 系统的性能与当前最先进的 CIE 进行了比较。用于比较性能的关键指标是灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和 F1 评分。
总共使用了来自 173949 名患者的 932711 份标准 12 导联心电图来开发 AI 系统。独立测试集汇总了 11932 个标注的 ECG 标签。在所有 6 种诊断类别中,DNN 都达到了较高的 F1 评分:节律 0.957、ACS 0.925、传导异常 0.893、异位 0.966、腔室扩大 0.972、轴 0.897。DNN 在 20 种基本诊断模式中的 13 种模式的诊断性能优于最先进的 CIE,其余个别诊断的性能则不劣于最先进的 CIE。
我们的结果表明,AI 驱动的心电图模型能够从 12 导联心电图中准确识别心电图异常,这凸显了它作为医疗保健专业人员的临床工具的潜力。