• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证一种用于 12 导联心电图解读的自动化人工智能系统。

Validation of an automated artificial intelligence system for 12‑lead ECG interpretation.

机构信息

Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy; Cardiovascular Centre Aalst, Aalst, Belgium; Powerful Medical, Bratislava, Slovakia.

Powerful Medical, Bratislava, Slovakia.

出版信息

J Electrocardiol. 2024 Jan-Feb;82:147-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2023.12.009. Epub 2023 Dec 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2023.12.009
PMID:38154405
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The electrocardiogram (ECG) is one of the most accessible and comprehensive diagnostic tools used to assess cardiac patients at the first point of contact. Despite advances in computerized interpretation of the electrocardiogram (CIE), its accuracy remains inferior to physicians. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of an artificial intelligence (AI)-powered ECG system and compared its performance to current state-of-the-art CIE.

METHODS

An AI-powered system consisting of 6 deep neural networks (DNN) was trained on standard 12‑lead ECGs to detect 20 essential diagnostic patterns (grouped into 6 categories: rhythm, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), conduction abnormalities, ectopy, chamber enlargement and axis). An independent test set of ECGs with diagnostic consensus of two expert cardiologists was used as a reference standard. AI system performance was compared to current state-of-the-art CIE. The key metrics used to compare performances were sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1 score.

RESULTS

A total of 932,711 standard 12‑lead ECGs from 173,949 patients were used for AI system development. The independent test set pooled 11,932 annotated ECG labels. In all 6 diagnostic categories, the DNNs achieved high F1 scores: Rhythm 0.957, ACS 0.925, Conduction abnormalities 0.893, Ectopy 0.966, Chamber enlargement 0.972, and Axis 0.897. The diagnostic performance of DNNs surpassed state-of-the-art CIE for the 13 out of 20 essential diagnostic patterns and was non-inferior for the remaining individual diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate the AI-powered ECG model's ability to accurately identify electrocardiographic abnormalities from the 12‑lead ECG, highlighting its potential as a clinical tool for healthcare professionals.

摘要

背景

心电图(ECG)是评估首诊心脏患者最便捷、最全面的诊断工具之一。尽管心电图计算机化解读(CIE)取得了进步,但它的准确性仍不如医生。本研究评估了人工智能(AI)驱动的心电图系统的诊断性能,并将其与当前最先进的 CIE 进行了比较。

方法

一个由 6 个深度神经网络(DNN)组成的 AI 系统,对标准的 12 导联心电图进行了训练,以检测 20 种基本诊断模式(分为 6 类:节律、急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)、传导异常、异位、腔室扩大和轴)。一个由两名专家心脏病医生诊断共识的独立 ECG 测试集被用作参考标准。AI 系统的性能与当前最先进的 CIE 进行了比较。用于比较性能的关键指标是灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和 F1 评分。

结果

总共使用了来自 173949 名患者的 932711 份标准 12 导联心电图来开发 AI 系统。独立测试集汇总了 11932 个标注的 ECG 标签。在所有 6 种诊断类别中,DNN 都达到了较高的 F1 评分:节律 0.957、ACS 0.925、传导异常 0.893、异位 0.966、腔室扩大 0.972、轴 0.897。DNN 在 20 种基本诊断模式中的 13 种模式的诊断性能优于最先进的 CIE,其余个别诊断的性能则不劣于最先进的 CIE。

结论

我们的结果表明,AI 驱动的心电图模型能够从 12 导联心电图中准确识别心电图异常,这凸显了它作为医疗保健专业人员的临床工具的潜力。

相似文献

1
Validation of an automated artificial intelligence system for 12‑lead ECG interpretation.验证一种用于 12 导联心电图解读的自动化人工智能系统。
J Electrocardiol. 2024 Jan-Feb;82:147-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2023.12.009. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
2
Performance of a Convolutional Neural Network and Explainability Technique for 12-Lead Electrocardiogram Interpretation.卷积神经网络性能及 12 导联心电图解释的可解释性技术。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Nov 1;6(11):1285-1295. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.2746.
3
A deep neural network learning algorithm outperforms a conventional algorithm for emergency department electrocardiogram interpretation.一种深度神经网络学习算法在急诊科心电图解读方面优于传统算法。
J Electrocardiol. 2019 Jan-Feb;52:88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
4
A comprehensive artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram interpretation program.一个全面的人工智能心电图解读程序。
Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2020 Sep 8;1(2):62-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2020.08.005. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.
5
An artificial intelligence-enabled ECG algorithm for the identification of patients with atrial fibrillation during sinus rhythm: a retrospective analysis of outcome prediction.一种基于人工智能的心电图算法,用于在窦性心律期间识别房颤患者:对结局预测的回顾性分析。
Lancet. 2019 Sep 7;394(10201):861-867. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31721-0. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
6
Smartwatch Electrocardiogram and Artificial Intelligence for Assessing Cardiac-Rhythm Safety of Drug Therapy in the COVID-19 Pandemic. The QT-logs study.智能手表心电图和人工智能评估 COVID-19 大流行期间药物治疗的心律安全性。QT 日志研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2021 May 15;331:333-339. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.01.002. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
7
Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography for accurate diagnosis and management of cardiovascular diseases.人工智能增强心电图在心血管疾病的准确诊断和管理中的应用。
J Electrocardiol. 2024 Mar-Apr;83:30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2024.01.006. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
8
Use of Artificial Intelligence and Deep Neural Networks in Evaluation of Patients With Electrocardiographically Concealed Long QT Syndrome From the Surface 12-Lead Electrocardiogram.基于体表 12 导联心电图评估心电图隐匿性长 QT 综合征患者中人工智能和深度神经网络的应用。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 May 1;6(5):532-538. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.7422.
9
Comparison of two artificial intelligence-augmented ECG approaches: Machine learning and deep learning.两种人工智能增强心电图方法的比较:机器学习和深度学习。
J Electrocardiol. 2023 Jul-Aug;79:75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2023.03.009. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
10
Automatic multilabel electrocardiogram diagnosis of heart rhythm or conduction abnormalities with deep learning: a cohort study.深度学习自动多标签心电图诊断心律失常或传导异常:一项队列研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Jul;2(7):e348-e357. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30107-2. Epub 2020 Jun 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Contrasting attitudes towards current and future artificial intelligence applications for computerised interpretation of electrocardiograms: a clinical stakeholder interview study.对当前及未来用于心电图计算机解读的人工智能应用的不同态度:一项临床利益相关者访谈研究
JAMIA Open. 2025 Jul 21;8(4):ooaf071. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf071. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Efficient pretraining of ECG scalogram images using masked autoencoders for cardiovascular disease diagnosis.使用掩码自动编码器对心电图小波图图像进行高效预训练以用于心血管疾病诊断。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 8;15(1):24444. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10773-w.
3
Expertly used unsupervised clustering provides clinical tools as well as insight.
熟练运用无监督聚类可提供临床工具并带来深刻见解。
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2025 Mar 5;6(3):311-312. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf015. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Artificial Intelligence-Powered Electrocardiogram Detecting Culprit Vessel Blood Flow Abnormality: AI-ECG TIMI Study Design and Rationale.人工智能驱动的心电图检测罪犯血管血流异常:AI-ECG TIMI研究设计与原理
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2025 Jan 13;4(3Part B):102494. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2024.102494. eCollection 2025 Mar.
5
Artificial Intelligence Advancements in Cardiomyopathies: Implications for Diagnosis and Management of Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy.心肌病领域的人工智能进展:对致心律失常性心肌病诊断和管理的影响。
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2024 Dec 11;22(1):5. doi: 10.1007/s11897-024-00688-4.