Mueller-Haugk Sebastian, Bidzan-Bluma Ilona, Bidzan-Wiącek Monika, Bulathwatta Darshika Thejani, Stueck Marcus
International Biocentric Research Academy, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Psychology, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdansk, Poland.
Health Psychol Rep. 2023 Oct 30;11(4):282-294. doi: 10.5114/hpr/171884. eCollection 2023.
The study aimed to assess the differences in anxiety management types between German and Polish samples. The research was conducted in the context of health-related variables and anxiety management types during the period of March to April 2020. The research project was approved by the Ethical Committee at the Institute of Psychology at the University of Gdansk, Poland.
German Sample: Consisted of 323 subjects with an average age of 46 years. 73% were females, and 26% were males. Polish Sample: Included 100 subjects with an average age of 42 years. 73% were females, and 27% were males. The study collected data on various health-related variables and anxiety management types using specific measurement procedures.
There were significant differences in the frequency distribution of anxiety management types between the Polish and German samples ( < .001). In the Polish sample, 60% showed negative anxiety management types (Sensitizer, Repressor, Highly anxious), compared to the German sample with 52%. 40% of the Polish and 48% of the German sample showed positive expressions. There were stronger significant differences in both samples regarding health-related variables, with the Polish sample being at a disadvantage.
The study provides a comprehensive insight into the anxiety management types between German and Polish samples, revealing distinct differences in their responses. The Polish sample exhibited a higher prevalence of negative anxiety management types compared to the German sample. These disparities can be attributed to a myriad of factors, including historical traumas, transgenerational experiences, and the influence of dominant religions in each country. The findings underscore the importance of considering cultural, historical, and religious contexts when assessing and addressing mental health and coping mechanisms across different populations. Further research with larger samples and diverse groups could offer a more nuanced understanding of these patterns and their underlying causes.
本研究旨在评估德国和波兰样本在焦虑管理类型上的差异。该研究于2020年3月至4月期间,在与健康相关的变量和焦虑管理类型的背景下进行。该研究项目获得了波兰格但斯克大学心理研究所伦理委员会的批准。
德国样本:由323名受试者组成,平均年龄46岁。73%为女性,26%为男性。波兰样本:包括100名受试者,平均年龄42岁。73%为女性,27%为男性。该研究使用特定的测量程序收集了关于各种与健康相关的变量和焦虑管理类型的数据。
波兰和德国样本在焦虑管理类型的频率分布上存在显著差异(<.001)。在波兰样本中,60%表现出消极的焦虑管理类型(敏感型、压抑型、高度焦虑型),而德国样本中这一比例为52%。波兰样本中有40%、德国样本中有48%表现出积极的表达方式。两个样本在与健康相关的变量方面也存在更强的显著差异,波兰样本处于劣势。
该研究全面深入地了解了德国和波兰样本的焦虑管理类型,揭示了它们反应上的明显差异。与德国样本相比,波兰样本中消极焦虑管理类型的患病率更高。这些差异可归因于众多因素,包括历史创伤、代际经历以及每个国家占主导地位的宗教的影响。研究结果强调了在评估和解决不同人群的心理健康及应对机制时,考虑文化、历史和宗教背景的重要性。对更大样本和不同群体进行进一步研究,可能会对这些模式及其潜在原因有更细致入微的理解。