Department of Medicine, Unity Hospital, Rochester Regional Health, Rochester, New York, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan.
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024 Jan 22;11(1):e002141. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002141.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated conflicting results regarding the effects of corticosteroids on the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of different corticosteroids on patients who were hospitalised for severe CAP.
We performed a systematic search through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to May 2023. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Data analysis was performed using a random-effects model.
A total of 10 RCTs comprising 1962 patients were included. Corticosteroids were associated with a lower rate of all-cause mortality (risk ratio (RR), 0.70 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.90); I=0.00%). When stratified into different corticosteroid types, hydrocortisone was associated with an approximately 50% lower mortality risk (RR, 0.48 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.72); I=0.00%). However, dexamethasone, methylprednisolone or prednisolone were not associated with an improvement in mortality. Furthermore, hydrocortisone was associated with a reduction in the rate of mechanical ventilation, acute respiratory distress syndrome, shock and duration of intensive care unit stay. These trends were not observed for dexamethasone, methylprednisolone or prednisolone. Corticosteroids were not associated with an increased risk of adverse events including gastrointestinal bleeding, secondary infection or hyperglycaemia.
The use of hydrocortisone, but not other types of corticosteroids, was associated with a reduction in mortality and improvement in pneumonia outcomes among patients hospitalised with severe CAP.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42023431360.
随机对照试验(RCT)已经得出了相互矛盾的结论,即皮质类固醇对治疗重症社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的影响。我们旨在研究不同皮质类固醇对因重症 CAP 住院的患者的疗效和安全性。
我们对 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库、Web of Science 和 Scopus 进行了系统检索,检索时间从建库至 2023 年 5 月。主要结局指标是全因死亡率。使用随机效应模型进行数据分析。
共纳入 10 项 RCT,包括 1962 例患者。皮质类固醇与较低的全因死亡率相关(风险比(RR),0.70(95%可信区间 0.54 至 0.90);I²=0.00%)。当按不同的皮质类固醇类型分层时,氢化可的松与死亡率降低约 50%相关(RR,0.48(95%可信区间 0.32 至 0.72);I²=0.00%)。然而,地塞米松、甲泼尼龙或泼尼松龙与死亡率的改善无关。此外,氢化可的松与机械通气、急性呼吸窘迫综合征、休克和重症监护病房停留时间的发生率降低相关。这些趋势在地塞米松、甲泼尼龙或泼尼松龙中并未观察到。皮质类固醇与包括胃肠道出血、继发感染或高血糖在内的不良事件风险增加无关。
在因重症 CAP 住院的患者中,使用氢化可的松而非其他类型的皮质类固醇可降低死亡率和改善肺炎结局。PROSPERO 注册号 CRD42023431360。