• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用深度学习将危险因素的纵向历史纳入动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险预测中。

Incorporating longitudinal history of risk factors into atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk prediction using deep learning.

机构信息

Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 31;14(1):2554. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51685-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-51685-5
PMID:38296982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10830564/
Abstract

It is increasingly clear that longitudinal risk factor levels and trajectories are related to risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) above and beyond single measures. Currently used in clinical care, the Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) are based on regression methods that predict ASCVD risk based on cross-sectional risk factor levels. Deep learning (DL) models have been developed to incorporate longitudinal data for risk prediction but its benefit for ASCVD risk prediction relative to the traditional Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE) remain unknown. Our study included 15,565 participants from four cardiovascular disease cohorts free of baseline ASCVD who were followed for adjudicated ASCVD. Ten-year ASCVD risk was calculated in the training set using our benchmark, the PCE, and a longitudinal DL model, Dynamic-DeepHit. Predictors included those incorporated in the PCE: sex, race, age, total cholesterol, high density lipid cholesterol, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, diabetes, hypertension treatment and smoking. The discrimination and calibration performance of the two models were evaluated in an overall hold-out testing dataset. Of the 15,565 participants in our dataset, 2170 (13.9%) developed ASCVD. The performance of the longitudinal DL model that incorporated 8 years of longitudinal risk factor data improved upon that of the PCE [AUROC: 0.815 (CI 0.782-0.844) vs 0.792 (CI 0.760-0.825)] and the net reclassification index was 0.385. The brier score for the DL model was 0.0514 compared with 0.0542 in the PCE. Incorporating longitudinal risk factors in ASCVD risk prediction using DL can improve model discrimination and calibration.

摘要

很明显,纵向风险因素水平和轨迹与动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的风险有关,而不仅仅是单一的措施。目前在临床护理中使用的Pooled Cohort Equations(PCE)是基于回归方法的,这些方法基于横断面风险因素水平来预测 ASCVD 风险。已经开发了深度学习(DL)模型来纳入纵向数据进行风险预测,但相对于传统的 Pooled Cohort Equations(PCE),其对 ASCVD 风险预测的益处尚不清楚。我们的研究包括四个无基线 ASCVD 的心血管疾病队列中的 15565 名参与者,他们接受了 ASCVD 裁决后的随访。在训练集中,使用我们的基准(PCE)和纵向 DL 模型(Dynamic-DeepHit)计算了 10 年的 ASCVD 风险。预测因子包括纳入 PCE 的那些:性别、种族、年龄、总胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、收缩压和舒张压、糖尿病、高血压治疗和吸烟。在整个保留测试数据集评估了两种模型的区分和校准性能。在我们的数据集的 15565 名参与者中,有 2170 名(13.9%)发生了 ASCVD。纳入 8 年纵向风险因素数据的纵向 DL 模型的性能优于 PCE [AUROC:0.815(CI 0.782-0.844)与 0.792(CI 0.760-0.825)],净重新分类指数为 0.385。DL 模型的 brier 评分为 0.0514,而 PCE 为 0.0542。使用 DL 对 ASCVD 风险预测中纳入纵向风险因素可以提高模型的区分度和校准度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e765/10830564/5559848b9dc3/41598_2024_51685_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e765/10830564/0b1f77904226/41598_2024_51685_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e765/10830564/8b6519a7ecdd/41598_2024_51685_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e765/10830564/8333d0ab6612/41598_2024_51685_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e765/10830564/caff721f26e3/41598_2024_51685_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e765/10830564/5559848b9dc3/41598_2024_51685_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e765/10830564/0b1f77904226/41598_2024_51685_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e765/10830564/8b6519a7ecdd/41598_2024_51685_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e765/10830564/8333d0ab6612/41598_2024_51685_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e765/10830564/caff721f26e3/41598_2024_51685_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e765/10830564/5559848b9dc3/41598_2024_51685_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Incorporating longitudinal history of risk factors into atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk prediction using deep learning.利用深度学习将危险因素的纵向历史纳入动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险预测中。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 31;14(1):2554. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-51685-5.
2
Incorporating longitudinal history of risk factors into atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk prediction using deep learning.利用深度学习将风险因素的纵向病史纳入动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险预测。
Res Sq. 2023 Oct 13:rs.3.rs-3405388. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3405388/v1.
3
Performance of the Pooled Cohort Equations to Estimate Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk by Body Mass Index.基于体重指数的 pooled cohort equations 评估动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险的性能。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Oct 1;3(10):e2023242. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23242.
4
Comparing the performance of machine learning and conventional models for predicting atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in a general Chinese population.比较机器学习模型和传统模型在预测一般中国人群中动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病方面的性能。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jul 24;23(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02242-z.
5
Risk Prediction for Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease With and Without Race Stratification.有无种族分层情况下动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的风险预测
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Jan 1;9(1):55-62. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.4520.
6
Comparison of State-of-the-Art Neural Network Survival Models with the Pooled Cohort Equations for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Prediction.比较最先进的神经网络生存模型与用于心血管疾病风险预测的合并队列方程。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Jan 24;23(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01829-w.
7
Socioeconomic status and modification of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk prediction: epidemiological analysis using data from the atherosclerosis risk in communities study.社会经济地位与动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险预测的改变:来自社区动脉粥样硬化风险研究的数据的流行病学分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 7;12(11):e058777. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058777.
8
Performance of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Pooled Cohort Equations to Estimate Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk by Self-reported Physical Activity Levels.基于自我报告的体力活动水平评估美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会合并队列方程对动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险的表现。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;6(6):690-696. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.0948.
9
Combining European and U.S. risk prediction models with polygenic risk scores to refine cardiovascular prevention: the CoLaus|PsyCoLaus Study.将欧洲和美国的风险预测模型与多基因风险评分相结合,以完善心血管预防:CoLaus|PsyCoLaus 研究。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2023 May 9;30(7):561-571. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad012.
10
The risk and added values of the atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk enhancers on prediction of cardiovascular events: Tehran lipid and glucose study.动脉粥样硬化性心血管风险增强因素对心血管事件预测的风险及附加价值:德黑兰血脂与血糖研究
J Transl Med. 2021 Jan 6;19(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02686-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Harnessing Electronic Health Records and Artificial Intelligence for Enhanced Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: A Comprehensive Review.利用电子健康记录和人工智能增强心血管疾病风险预测:一项全面综述。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Mar 18;14(6):e036946. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036946. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
2
Transforming Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: A Review of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence Innovations.转变心血管疾病风险预测:机器学习与人工智能创新综述
Life (Basel). 2025 Jan 14;15(1):94. doi: 10.3390/life15010094.

本文引用的文献

1
Cardiovascular risk assessment: The foundation of preventive cardiology.心血管风险评估:预防心脏病学的基础。
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2020 May 1;1:100008. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2020.100008. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
Comparison of deep learning with traditional models to predict preventable acute care use and spending among heart failure patients.比较深度学习与传统模型预测心力衰竭患者可预防急性护理的使用和支出。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):1164. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80856-3.
3
Deep representation learning of patient data from Electronic Health Records (EHR): A systematic review.
电子健康记录(EHR)中患者数据的深度表征学习:一项系统综述。
J Biomed Inform. 2021 Mar;115:103671. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103671. Epub 2020 Dec 31.
4
Association of Cumulative Systolic Blood Pressure With Long-Term Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Healthy Longevity: Findings From the Lifetime Risk Pooling Project Cohorts.累积收缩压与长期心血管疾病风险和健康长寿的关系:来自终生风险汇集项目队列的研究结果。
Hypertension. 2021 Feb;77(2):347-356. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15650. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
5
A deep learning-based, unsupervised method to impute missing values in electronic health records for improved patient management.一种基于深度学习的、无监督的方法,用于填补电子健康记录中的缺失值,以改善患者管理。
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Nov;111:103576. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103576. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
6
Time Course of LDL Cholesterol Exposure and Cardiovascular Disease Event Risk.LDL 胆固醇暴露与心血管疾病事件风险的时间进程。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Sep 29;76(13):1507-1516. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.059.
7
Re-estimation improved the performance of two Framingham cardiovascular risk equations and the Pooled Cohort equations: A nationwide registry analysis.再估算改进了两种弗雷明汉心血管风险方程和队列方程的性能:一项全国性登记分析。
Sci Rep. 2020 May 18;10(1):8140. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64629-6.
8
Improved Landmark Dynamic Prediction Model to Assess Cardiovascular Disease Risk in On-Treatment Blood Pressure Patients: A Simulation Study and Post Hoc Analysis on SPRINT Data.基于 SPRINT 数据的治疗中血压患者心血管疾病风险评估的改进标志点动态预测模型:一项模拟研究和事后分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Apr 22;2020:2905167. doi: 10.1155/2020/2905167. eCollection 2020.
9
Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records.借助电子健康记录实现可扩展且准确的深度学习。
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 May 8;1:18. doi: 10.1038/s41746-018-0029-1. eCollection 2018.
10
Performance of the Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.弗拉明汉风险模型和队列汇总方程预测心血管疾病 10 年风险的性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2019 Jun 13;17(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1340-7.