James Tyler G, DeJonckheere Melissa, Guetterman Timothy C
Michigan Mixed Methods Program, Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Mix Methods Res. 2024 Jan;18(1):14-30. doi: 10.1177/15586898221149470. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
Integrating philosophical or paradigmatic dimensions in mixed methods research studies facilitates the development of stronger meta-inferences. The transformative paradigm and the explanatory sequential mixed methods design share a focus on developing sampling criteria, but with different priorities. This article contributes to the field of mixed methods research by presenting a method of integrating transformative sampling considerations in explanatory sequential designs through a participant selection joint display. The approach presented addresses concerns regarding transparency of research decisions in mixed methods studies, while providing a method of centering the transformative paradigm in mixed methods integration procedures.
在混合方法研究中整合哲学或范式维度有助于得出更有力的元推断。变革性范式与解释性序列混合方法设计都注重制定抽样标准,但重点不同。本文通过一种参与者选择联合展示的方法,将变革性抽样考量整合到解释性序列设计中,为混合方法研究领域做出了贡献。所提出的方法解决了混合方法研究中研究决策透明度的问题,同时提供了一种在混合方法整合过程中将变革性范式置于中心位置的方法。