Lim Shi Huan, Wong Tin Wui, Tay Wei Xian
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, 18 Science Drive 4, Republic of Singapore 117543.
Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, 18 Science Drive 4, Republic of Singapore 117543; Non-Destructive Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Research Centre, Smart Manufacturing Research institute, Universiti Teknologi MARA Selangor, Puncak Alam 42300, Selangor, Malaysia; Particle Design Research Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA Selangor, Puncak Alam 42300, Selangor, Malaysia; UM-UiTM Excipient Development Research Unit (EXDEU), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Malaya, Lembah Pantai 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2024 Mar;325:103094. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2024.103094. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
Nanoparticles as cancer therapeutic carrier fail in clinical translation due to complex biological environments in vivo consisting of electrolytes and proteins which render nanoparticle aggregation and unable to reach action site. This review identifies the desirable characteristics of nanoparticles and their constituent materials that prevent aggregation from site of administration (oral, lung, injection) to target site. Oral nanoparticles should ideally be 75-100 nm whereas the size of pulmonary nanoparticles minimally affects their aggregation. Nanoparticles generally should carry excess negative surface charges particularly in fasting state and exert steric hindrance through surface decoration with citrate, anionic surfactants and large polymeric chains (polyethylene glycol and polyvinylpyrrolidone) to prevent aggregation. Anionic as well as cationic nanoparticles are both predisposed to protein corona formation as a function of biological protein isoelectric points. Their nanoparticulate surface composition as such should confer hydrophilicity or steric hindrance to evade protein corona formation or its formation should translate into steric hindrance or surface negative charges to prevent further aggregation. Unexpectedly, smaller and cationic nanoparticles are less prone to aggregation at cancer cell interface favoring endocytosis whereas aggregation is essential to enable nanoparticles retention and subsequent cancer cell uptake in tumor microenvironment. Present studies are largely conducted in vitro with simplified simulated biological media. Future aggregation assessment of nanoparticles in biological fluids that mimic that of patients is imperative to address conflicting materials and designs required as a function of body sites in order to realize the future clinical benefits.
作为癌症治疗载体的纳米颗粒在临床转化中失败,原因是体内复杂的生物环境,其中包含电解质和蛋白质,这会导致纳米颗粒聚集,无法到达作用部位。本综述确定了纳米颗粒及其组成材料的理想特性,这些特性可防止纳米颗粒从给药部位(口服、肺部、注射)到靶部位发生聚集。理想情况下,口服纳米颗粒的大小应为75-100纳米,而肺部纳米颗粒的大小对其聚集的影响最小。纳米颗粒通常应带有过量的负表面电荷,尤其是在禁食状态下,并通过用柠檬酸盐、阴离子表面活性剂和大聚合物链(聚乙二醇和聚乙烯吡咯烷酮)进行表面修饰来发挥空间位阻作用,以防止聚集。阴离子和阳离子纳米颗粒都易于形成蛋白质冠层,这是生物蛋白质等电点的函数。因此,它们的纳米颗粒表面组成应赋予亲水性或空间位阻,以避免形成蛋白质冠层,或者其形成应转化为空间位阻或表面负电荷,以防止进一步聚集。出乎意料的是,较小的阳离子纳米颗粒在癌细胞界面处不易聚集,有利于内吞作用,而聚集对于使纳米颗粒在肿瘤微环境中保留并随后被癌细胞摄取至关重要。目前的研究大多在体外使用简化的模拟生物介质进行。未来有必要在模拟患者生物流体的环境中对纳米颗粒进行聚集评估,以解决因身体部位而异所需的相互矛盾的材料和设计问题,从而实现未来的临床益处。