• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对畜牧业未来的世界观、价值观和观点。

Worldviews, values and perspectives towards the future of the livestock sector.

作者信息

Blair Kirsty Joanna, Moran Dominic, Alexander Peter

机构信息

Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Security, The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, EH25 9RG UK.

School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, EH25 9RG Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Agric Human Values. 2024;41(1):91-108. doi: 10.1007/s10460-023-10469-9. Epub 2023 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1007/s10460-023-10469-9
PMID:38404759
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10884050/
Abstract

The livestock sector is under increasing pressure to respond to numerous sustainability and health challenges related to the production and consumption of livestock products. However, political and market barriers and conflicting worldviews and values across the environmental, socio-economic and political domains have led to considerable sector inertia, and government inaction. The processes that lead to the formulation of perspectives in this space, and that shape action (or inaction), are currently under-researched. This paper presents results of a mixed methods exploration of the influence of environmental worldviews, values, and demographic factors on perspectives towards the future of the livestock sector. The approach combines survey and interview data derived from a sample of livestock representatives (N = 307). Respondents with higher pro-environmental, ecocentric and relational worldviews and values favour more behaviour-oriented solutions. Those with lower pro-environmental and higher techno-centric worldviews and values favour technological solutions to improve the efficiency of production and to enable continued patterns of meat consumption. Demographic variation and qualitative data emphasise the need to recognise cultural and geographic nuance in narratives. This study improves our understanding of the processes that lead to the formulation of perspectives, enabling the development of more holistic solutions that acknowledge all voices in an increasingly polarised debate. Adopting more pluralistic, relational methodologies will therefore be paramount in developing solutions for sustainable livestock futures.

摘要

畜牧业面临着越来越大的压力,需要应对与畜产品生产和消费相关的众多可持续性和健康挑战。然而,政治和市场壁垒以及环境、社会经济和政治领域相互冲突的世界观和价值观导致了该行业的严重惰性以及政府的不作为。目前,对于在这一领域形成观点并塑造行动(或不作为)的过程研究不足。本文展示了一项混合方法探索的结果,该探索研究了环境世界观、价值观和人口因素对畜牧业未来观点的影响。该方法结合了从畜牧代表样本(N = 307)中获取的调查和访谈数据。具有较高亲环境、生态中心和关系型世界观及价值观的受访者更倾向于以行为为导向的解决方案。而亲环境程度较低且技术中心型世界观及价值观较高的受访者则倾向于采用技术解决方案来提高生产效率并维持肉类消费模式。人口差异和定性数据强调了在叙述中认识文化和地理细微差别的必要性。这项研究增进了我们对形成观点过程的理解,有助于制定更全面的解决方案,在日益两极分化的辩论中兼顾各方声音。因此,采用更具多元性、关系型的方法对于为可持续畜牧业未来制定解决方案至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9665/10884050/4045d32a3bf0/10460_2023_10469_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9665/10884050/bfd04f43a695/10460_2023_10469_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9665/10884050/3570610bfa91/10460_2023_10469_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9665/10884050/36678e90e4b4/10460_2023_10469_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9665/10884050/4cef5448adc5/10460_2023_10469_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9665/10884050/4045d32a3bf0/10460_2023_10469_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9665/10884050/bfd04f43a695/10460_2023_10469_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9665/10884050/3570610bfa91/10460_2023_10469_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9665/10884050/36678e90e4b4/10460_2023_10469_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9665/10884050/4cef5448adc5/10460_2023_10469_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9665/10884050/4045d32a3bf0/10460_2023_10469_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Worldviews, values and perspectives towards the future of the livestock sector.对畜牧业未来的世界观、价值观和观点。
Agric Human Values. 2024;41(1):91-108. doi: 10.1007/s10460-023-10469-9. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
2
Review: Make ruminants green again - how can sustainable intensification and agroecology converge for a better future?综述:让反刍动物再次变得环保——可持续集约化和农业生态学如何融合以实现更美好的未来?
Animal. 2018 Dec;12(s2):s210-s219. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118001350. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
3
Consumer perception of the challenges facing livestock production and meat consumption.消费者对畜牧生产和肉类消费所面临挑战的认知。
Meat Sci. 2023 Jun;200:109144. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109144. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
4
Synergies between veterinarians and para-professionals in the public and private sectors: organisational and institutional relationships that facilitate the process of privatising animal health services in developing countries.公共和私营部门兽医与辅助专业人员之间的协同作用:促进发展中国家动物卫生服务私有化进程的组织和机构关系。
Rev Sci Tech. 2004 Apr;23(1):115-35; discussion 391-401. doi: 10.20506/rst.23.1.1472.
5
Towards sustainability in the extensive and intensive livestock sectors.迈向粗放型和集约型畜牧业的可持续发展
Rev Sci Tech. 2016 Nov;35(2):371-387. doi: 10.20506/rst.35.2.2531.
6
The role of worldviews in the governance of sustainable mobility.世界观在可持续交通治理中的作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Feb 25;117(8):4034-4042. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1916936117. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
7
New insights in improving sustainability in meat production: opportunities and challenges.提高肉类生产可持续性的新见解:机遇与挑战。
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2023 Nov;63(33):11830-11858. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2096562. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
8
The roles of livestock in developing countries.牲畜在发展中国家的作用。
Animal. 2013 Mar;7 Suppl 1:3-18. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112001954. Epub 2012 Nov 5.
9
Review: Smart agri-systems for the pig industry.综述:用于养猪业的智能农业系统。
Animal. 2022 Jun;16 Suppl 2:100518. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100518. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
10
Challenges and opportunities to livestock breeding programmes in India.印度畜牧业面临的挑战与机遇。
J Anim Breed Genet. 2019 Sep;136(5):329-338. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12391. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Horse Activity Participants' Perceptions About Practices Undertaken at Activity Venues, and Horse Welfare and Wellbeing.马匹活动参与者对活动场地所采取的措施以及马匹福利与健康状况的看法。
Animals (Basel). 2025 Jul 24;15(15):2182. doi: 10.3390/ani15152182.
2
Influence of age, gender, and willingness to adopt former foodstuffs on the perception of Italian farm animal veterinarians.年龄、性别以及采用以前食品的意愿对意大利农场动物兽医认知的影响。
Front Vet Sci. 2024 Jun 6;11:1396807. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1396807. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Education- and income-related differences in processed meat consumption across Europe: The role of food-related attitudes.教育和收入对欧洲加工肉类消费的影响差异:与食物相关的态度的作用。
Appetite. 2023 Mar 1;182:106417. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2022.106417. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
2
Technological, Regulatory, and Ethical Aspects of In Vitro Meat: A Future Slaughter-Free Harvest.体外培养肉的技术、监管及伦理方面:未来无屠宰的肉类收获
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2019 Jul;18(4):1192-1208. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12473. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
3
The role of worldviews in the governance of sustainable mobility.
世界观在可持续交通治理中的作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Feb 25;117(8):4034-4042. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1916936117. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
4
The ethics of genome editing in non-human animals: a systematic review of reasons reported in the academic literature.非人类动物基因组编辑的伦理:学术文献中报告的原因的系统综述。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 May 13;374(1772):20180106. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0106.
5
What's in a name? Consumer perceptions of in vitro meat under different names.名称背后的含义:不同名称下消费者对体外培育肉的认知
Appetite. 2019 Jun 1;137:104-113. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.02.021. Epub 2019 Mar 3.
6
Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.人类世的食物:EAT-柳叶刀可持续食物系统健康饮食委员会
Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):447-492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
7
Meat consumption, health, and the environment.肉类消费、健康与环境。
Science. 2018 Jul 20;361(6399). doi: 10.1126/science.aam5324.
8
Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers.通过生产者和消费者减少食物对环境的影响。
Science. 2018 Jun 1;360(6392):987-992. doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0216.
9
If you build it, will they eat it? Consumer preferences for plant-based and cultured meat burgers.如果建造它,他们会吃吗?消费者对植物性和培养肉汉堡的偏好。
Appetite. 2018 Jun 1;125:428-437. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.02.030. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
10
Review: Feed demand landscape and implications of food-not feed strategy for food security and climate change.综述:食物而非饲料战略对粮食安全和气候变化的饲料需求状况和影响。
Animal. 2018 Aug;12(8):1744-1754. doi: 10.1017/S175173111700324X. Epub 2017 Dec 4.