Ichim Mihael Cristin, Booker Anthony
"Stejarul" Research Centre for Biological Sciences, National Institute of Research and Development for Biological Sciences, Piatra Neamt, Romania.
Research Centre for Optimal Health, School of Life Sciences, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Westminster, London, United Kingdom.
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Apr 15;12:666850. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.666850. eCollection 2021.
Chemical methods are the most important and widely used traditional plant identification techniques recommended by national and international pharmacopoeias. We have reviewed the successful use of different chemical methods for the botanical authentication of 2,386 commercial herbal products, sold in 37 countries spread over six continents. The majority of the analyzed products were reported to be authentic (73%) but more than a quarter proved to be adulterated (27%). At a national level, the number of products and the adulteration proportions varied very widely. Yet, the adulteration reported for the four countries, from which more than 100 commercial products were purchased and their botanical ingredients chemically authenticated, was 37% (United Kingdom), 31% (Italy), 27% (United States), and 21% (China). Simple or hyphenated chemical analytical techniques have identified the total absence of labeled botanical ingredients, substitution with closely related or unrelated species, the use of biological filler material, and the hidden presence of regulated, forbidden or allergenic species. Additionally, affecting the safety and efficacy of the commercial herbal products, other low quality aspects were reported: considerable variability of the labeled metabolic profile and/or phytochemical content, significant product-to-product variation of botanical ingredients or even between batches by the same manufacturer, and misleading quality and quantity label claims. Choosing an appropriate chemical technique can be the only possibility for assessing the botanical authenticity of samples which have lost their diagnostic microscopic characteristics or were processed so that DNA cannot be adequately recovered.
化学方法是国家和国际药典推荐的最重要且应用最广泛的传统植物鉴定技术。我们回顾了不同化学方法在对六大洲37个国家销售的2386种商业草药产品进行植物鉴定方面的成功应用。据报道,大多数被分析的产品是正品(73%),但超过四分之一被证明掺假(27%)。在国家层面,产品数量和掺假比例差异很大。然而,从购买了100多种商业产品并对其植物成分进行化学鉴定的四个国家报告的掺假情况来看,英国为37%,意大利为31%,美国为27%,中国为21%。简单或联用的化学分析技术已鉴定出标记的植物成分完全缺失、被近缘或无关物种替代、使用生物填充材料以及存在受管制、禁用或致敏物种的隐藏情况。此外,还报告了影响商业草药产品安全性和有效性的其他低质量方面:标记的代谢谱和/或植物化学成分存在相当大的变异性、植物成分在产品之间甚至同一制造商不同批次之间存在显著差异,以及质量和数量标签声明具有误导性。对于那些已失去诊断性微观特征或经过处理以至于无法充分回收DNA的样品,选择合适的化学技术可能是评估其植物真实性的唯一方法。