• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国公众对科学的信心趋势及进步的机会。

Trends in U.S. public confidence in science and opportunities for progress.

机构信息

Office of the Vice President for Research and Department of Political Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.

Dean, School of Public Health, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 12;121(11):e2319488121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2319488121. Epub 2024 Mar 4.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2319488121
PMID:38437563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10945819/
Abstract

In recent years, many questions have been raised about whether public confidence in science is changing. To clarify recent trends in the public's confidence and factors that are associated with these feelings, an effort initiated by the National Academies' Strategic Council for Research Excellence, Integrity, and Trust (the Strategic Council) analyzed findings from multiple survey research organizations. The Strategic Council's effort, which began in 2022, found that U.S. public confidence in science, the scientific community, and leaders of scientific communities is high relative to other civic, cultural, and governmental institutions for which researchers regularly collect such data. However, confidence in these institutions has fallen during the previous 5 years. Science's decline, while real, is similar to or less than that in the other groups. A recent study goes into greater detail by exploring public views of science. From these data, we observe that many of the surveyed U.S. public question the extent to which scientists share their values or overcome personal biases when presenting conclusions. At the same time, large majorities agree on certain types of actions that they want scientists to take. For example, 84% respond that it is "somewhat important" or "very important" for scientists to disclose their funders. Ninety-two percent (92%) offer the same responses to scientists "being open to changing their minds based on new evidence." Collectively, these data clarify how the U.S. public views science and scientists. They also suggest actions that can affect public confidence in science and scientists in the years to come.

摘要

近年来,人们对公众对科学的信心是否正在发生变化提出了诸多疑问。为了厘清公众信心的最新趋势以及与这些感受相关的因素,由美国国家科学院卓越、诚信和信任研究战略委员会(战略委员会)发起的一项工作,分析了多个调查研究组织的调查结果。该战略委员会于 2022 年开始这项工作,发现与其他经常收集此类数据的公民、文化和政府机构相比,美国公众对科学、科学界和科学界领导人的信心很高。然而,这些机构的信心在过去 5 年有所下降。科学的衰落虽然真实存在,但与其他群体相比,情况类似或更轻。最近的一项研究更详细地探讨了公众对科学的看法。从这些数据中,我们观察到,许多接受调查的美国公众质疑科学家在陈述结论时分享其价值观或克服个人偏见的程度。与此同时,绝大多数人都同意他们希望科学家采取某些类型的行动。例如,84%的人认为科学家披露资助者的情况“有些重要”或“非常重要”。92%的人对科学家“根据新证据改变主意持开放态度”的情况做出了同样的回应。这些数据共同阐明了美国公众对科学和科学家的看法。它们还提出了在未来几年可能影响公众对科学和科学家信心的行动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca1/10945819/0a166c4bd183/pnas.2319488121fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca1/10945819/d502fcc7bfa3/pnas.2319488121fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca1/10945819/c98aa04dc009/pnas.2319488121fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca1/10945819/0a166c4bd183/pnas.2319488121fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca1/10945819/d502fcc7bfa3/pnas.2319488121fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca1/10945819/c98aa04dc009/pnas.2319488121fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ca1/10945819/0a166c4bd183/pnas.2319488121fig03.jpg

相似文献

1
Trends in U.S. public confidence in science and opportunities for progress.美国公众对科学的信心趋势及进步的机会。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 12;121(11):e2319488121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2319488121. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
2
Transforming the Future of Surgeon-Scientists.变革外科医生-科学家的未来。
Ann Surg. 2024 Feb 1;279(2):231-239. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006148. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
3
Cuba-U.S. scientific collaboration: Beyond the embargo.古巴-美国科学合作:超越封锁。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 22;16(7):e0255106. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255106. eCollection 2021.
4
Culture of Care: Organizational Responsibilities关怀文化:组织职责
5
Factors Assessing Science's Self-Presentation model and their effect on conservatives' and liberals' support for funding science.评估科学的自我呈现模型的因素及其对保守派和自由派支持科学资金的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Sep 19;120(38):e2213838120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2213838120. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
New trends in science communication fostering evidence-informed policymaking.促进基于证据的决策制定的科学传播新趋势。
Open Res Eur. 2023 Oct 24;2:78. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.14769.2. eCollection 2022.
8
You say you want an evolution? A role for scientists in science education.你说你想要一场变革?科学家在科学教育中的角色。
Dev Biol. 2008 Apr 1;316(1):2-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.01.021. Epub 2008 Jan 26.
9
Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities.科学家对公民理解科学的程度及其在公众参与活动中的作用的看法和态度。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 13;14(11):e0224262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224262. eCollection 2019.
10
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.

引用本文的文献

1
The rising danger of AI-generated images in nanomaterials science and what we can do about it.人工智能生成图像在纳米材料科学中日益增加的危险以及我们对此能做些什么。
Nat Nanotechnol. 2025 Sep;20(9):1174-1177. doi: 10.1038/s41565-025-02009-9.
2
Why too much biomedical research is often undeserving of the public's trust.为何太多的生物医学研究往往辜负公众的信任。
Front Genet. 2025 Jun 26;16:1587616. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1587616. eCollection 2025.
3
The importance of scientists' intellectual humility for communicating effectively across ideological and identity-based divides.

本文引用的文献

1
Correction is courageous.纠错需要勇气。
Science. 2023 Nov 17;382(6672):743. doi: 10.1126/science.adm8205. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
2
Factors Assessing Science's Self-Presentation model and their effect on conservatives' and liberals' support for funding science.评估科学的自我呈现模型的因素及其对保守派和自由派支持科学资金的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Sep 19;120(38):e2213838120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2213838120. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
3
Retractions are increasing, but not enough.撤稿数量在增加,但还不够。
科学家的智识谦逊对于跨越意识形态和基于身份的分歧进行有效沟通的重要性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 8;122(27):e2400930121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2400930121. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
4
Communicating with society about the science behind meat and livestock production.就肉类和畜牧业生产背后的科学知识与社会进行沟通。
Anim Front. 2025 Apr 5;15(1):94-96. doi: 10.1093/af/vfae039. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Evaluating the Reproducibility and Verifiability of Nutrition Research: A Case Study of Studies Assessing the Relationship Between Potatoes and Colorectal Cancer.评估营养研究的可重复性和可验证性:以评估土豆与结直肠癌关系的研究为例
medRxiv. 2024 Dec 2:2024.12.01.24318272. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.01.24318272.
6
Rapidly diverging public trust in science in the United States.美国公众对科学的信任迅速分化。
Public Underst Sci. 2024 Dec 7;34(5):9636625241302970. doi: 10.1177/09636625241302970.
7
From complexity to clarity: How AI enhances perceptions of scientists and the public's understanding of science.从复杂到清晰:人工智能如何提升科学家的认知以及公众对科学的理解。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Sep 6;3(9):pgae387. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae387. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Nature. 2022 Aug;608(7921):9. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-02071-6.
4
The role of non-COVID-specific and COVID-specific factors in predicting a shift in willingness to vaccinate: A panel study.非 COVID 特异性和 COVID 特异性因素在预测接种意愿转变中的作用:一项面板研究。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Dec 28;118(52). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2112266118.
5
The Strategic Council for Research Excellence, Integrity, and Trust.卓越、诚信与信任研究战略委员会。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Oct 12;118(41). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116647118.
6
Coronavirus conspiracy suspicions, general vaccine attitudes, trust and coronavirus information source as predictors of vaccine hesitancy among UK residents during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠病毒阴谋论怀疑、一般疫苗态度、信任和新冠病毒信息来源对英国居民在 COVID-19 大流行期间疫苗犹豫的预测。
Psychol Med. 2023 Jan;53(1):236-247. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001434. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
7
Transparency in authors' contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication.透明度在作者的贡献和责任,以促进科学出版的诚信。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2557-2560. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715374115. Epub 2018 Feb 27.