Shanghai Eye Disease Prevention & Treatment Center/Shanghai Eye Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
National Clinical Research Center for Eye Diseases, Shanghai, China.
Biomed Eng Online. 2024 Mar 12;23(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12938-024-01222-2.
This study aimed to investigate the imaging repeatability of self-service fundus photography compared to traditional fundus photography performed by experienced operators.
Prospective cross-sectional study.
In a community-based eye diseases screening site, we recruited 65 eyes (65 participants) from the resident population of Shanghai, China. All participants were devoid of cataract or any other conditions that could potentially compromise the quality of fundus imaging. Participants were categorized into fully self-service fundus photography or traditional fundus photography group. Image quantitative analysis software was used to extract clinically relevant indicators from the fundus images. Finally, a statistical analysis was performed to depict the imaging repeatability of fully self-service fundus photography.
There was no statistical difference in the absolute differences, or the extents of variation of the indicators between the two groups. The extents of variation of all the measurement indicators, with the exception of the optic cup area, were below 10% in both groups. The Bland-Altman plots and multivariate analysis results were consistent with results mentioned above.
The image repeatability of fully self-service fundus photography is comparable to that of traditional fundus photography performed by professionals, demonstrating promise in large-scale eye disease screening programs.
本研究旨在探讨自助式眼底摄影与由经验丰富的操作人员进行的传统眼底摄影相比的影像学可重复性。
前瞻性横断面研究。
在一个基于社区的眼病筛查点,我们从中国上海的居民中招募了 65 只眼睛(65 名参与者)。所有参与者均无白内障或任何其他可能影响眼底成像质量的疾病。参与者分为完全自助式眼底摄影组或传统眼底摄影组。使用图像定量分析软件从眼底图像中提取临床相关指标。最后,进行统计分析以描述完全自助式眼底摄影的影像学可重复性。
两组间指标的绝对差异或变异程度均无统计学差异。除视杯面积外,所有测量指标的变异程度均低于两组的 10%。Bland-Altman 图和多变量分析结果与上述结果一致。
完全自助式眼底摄影的图像可重复性可与专业人员进行的传统眼底摄影相媲美,这为大规模眼病筛查项目提供了希望。