Kushinga, Harare, Zimbabwe; Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Kushinga, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Soc Sci Med. 2024 May;348:116791. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116791. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
We piloted the Friendship Bench-an evidence-based, urban-area task sharing intervention for common mental disorders-in rural Zimbabwe. The intervention combines problem solving therapy with income generating activities. This study sought to understand the intervention's implementation in terms of acceptability, feasibility, and sustainability as well as local attitudes towards mental wellbeing in rural Zimbabwe.
Using four separate semi-structured interview guides, we conducted in-depth interviews (N = 32) with patients (n = 9), village health workers (n = 12), nurses (n = 6), and community leaders (n = 5). We analyzed our data using thematic analysis with a diverse coding team using an integrative deductive-inductive approach.
Five themes emerged: 1) explanatory models for mental illness, 2) clinical workflow and emphasis on documentation, 3) positive feedback about the Friendship Bench, 4) accessibility, and 5) feasibility.
In its current format, our intervention was acceptable but neither feasible nor sustainable. Sociocultural context is critical in the development of rural task sharing interventions for mental health. We thus recommend a robust pilot and adaptation phase when scaling task sharing interventions in rural sub-Saharan Africa to elevate community voices, leverage existing social structures, and embed interventions as deeply into communities as possible.
我们在津巴布韦农村地区试行“友谊长凳”——这是一种基于证据的城市地区常见精神障碍任务分担干预措施。该干预措施将问题解决疗法与创造收入的活动相结合。本研究旨在从可接受性、可行性和可持续性以及当地人对津巴布韦农村地区精神健康的态度等方面来理解该干预措施的实施情况。
我们使用四个单独的半结构化访谈指南,对患者(n=9)、乡村卫生工作者(n=12)、护士(n=6)和社区领袖(n=5)进行了深入访谈。我们使用多元化编码团队进行主题分析,采用综合演绎-归纳方法分析我们的数据。
出现了五个主题:1)精神疾病的解释模型,2)临床工作流程和强调文件记录,3)对友谊长凳的积极反馈,4)可及性,5)可行性。
在目前的形式下,我们的干预措施是可以接受的,但既不可行也不可持续。社会文化背景在制定农村地区精神卫生任务分担干预措施方面至关重要。因此,我们建议在撒哈拉以南非洲农村地区扩大任务分担干预措施时,进行强有力的试点和适应阶段,以提升社区的声音,利用现有的社会结构,并尽可能将干预措施深深嵌入社区。