Ouyang Sha, Zhang Wei, Xu Jian, Mat Rashid Abdullah, How Shwu Pyng, Bin Hassan Aminuddin
Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, UPM, Serdang, 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.
Shaanxi Railway Institute, Shaanxi, Weinan, China.
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 10;10(8):e29176. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29176. eCollection 2024 Apr 30.
China's distinctive educational approach, particularly its emphasis on ideological and political education, has garnered considerable academic attention for its impact on shaping individual values, fostering citizenship, and maintaining social stability. Despite the Chinese government's prioritization of ideological and political education, academic research in this field appears constrained, with existing studies predominantly focusing on normative and descriptive aspects. Normative research delineates how ideological and political education should be executed, while descriptive research illustrates its practical implementation. The effectiveness of these approaches is significantly diminished if they are not adequately interconnected-when only the current reality is explained without providing tools for improvement or when prescribed steps for improvement lack a basis in specific contexts. This paper conducts a comprehensive review of research on ideological and political education using ATLAS. ti 9 for thematic analysis. The review aims to unveil the intricate landscape of current research in China and address key questions: What are the primary trends in the literature on ideological and political education between 2021 and July 2023? What challenges does ideological and political education face? Through a direct exploration of these issues, this paper seeks to optimize the ideological and political education system, elevate its adaptability and effectiveness, and open avenues for research, fostering a more dynamic, inclusive, and resilient development of ideological and political education.
中国独特的教育方式，尤其是其对思想政治教育的重视，因其在塑造个人价值观、培养公民意识和维护社会稳定方面的影响而受到了相当多的学术关注。尽管中国政府将思想政治教育置于优先地位，但该领域的学术研究似乎受到限制，现有研究主要集中在规范性和描述性方面。规范性研究阐述了思想政治教育应如何实施，而描述性研究则说明了其实际执行情况。如果这些方法没有充分相互联系，其有效性将大打折扣——比如只解释当前现实而不提供改进工具，或者规定的改进步骤缺乏具体背景依据。本文使用ATLAS.ti 9进行主题分析，对思想政治教育研究进行了全面综述。该综述旨在揭示中国当前研究的复杂图景，并解决关键问题：2021年至2023年7月期间，思想政治教育文献的主要趋势是什么？思想政治教育面临哪些挑战？通过直接探讨这些问题，本文旨在优化思想政治教育体系，提高其适应性和有效性，并为研究开辟道路，促进思想政治教育更具活力、更具包容性和更具韧性的发展。
