• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共居安排中的姑息(临终)文化:日常护理实践的观点。

Palliative (farewell) culture in shared housing arrangements : The perspective of everyday nursing practice.

机构信息

Institute of Nursing Science and Practice, Paracelsus Medical University, Strubergasse 21, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2024 Jul;57(4):284-289. doi: 10.1007/s00391-024-02313-4. Epub 2024 Jun 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00391-024-02313-4
PMID:38832984
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11208262/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shared housing arrangements (SHA) are alternatives to long-term care facilities for care-dependent people. The collective perspective of nursing professionals working in SHA in dealing with death and dying is missing in recent studies. This study aimed to investigate the perspective of professionals concerning a palliative (farewell) culture in SHA.

METHODS

In this study two group discussions were conducted with nurses and nursing assistants working in SHA. Data were analyzed using the documentary method, with the aim of working out the professional orientation framework concerning a collective palliative culture.

RESULTS

Nurses enable a palliative (farewell) culture. This leads to the fact that hospice services are not used in these SHA. The distance to relatives as well as a short dying process or incomplete dying support can make a successful palliative culture difficult. Depending on the conscious assumption of responsibility for a palliative culture in the nursing concept of SHA, death and dying are discussed at an early stage with the relatives and care-dependent people.

DISCUSSION

The constantly progressing palliative culture in SHA is based on nurses' experiences, general practitioners (GP) and relatives. The family carers' role is ambiguous. If they do what they are supposed to do from the professional nurses' point of view and are closely connected to the nurses, they are viewed positively and as enablers of a palliative culture. If family carers' responsibilities are not communicated and they are not in close contact with professional nurses, they are viewed as opponents of a palliative culture. The GPs are seen as enablers of a palliative culture in both discussions. A timely discussion on what might happen in the end of life phase, formalized or not, helps all involved groups to be prepared.

摘要

背景

共享住房安排(SHA)是依赖护理的人替代长期护理机构的选择。在最近的研究中,缺乏从事 SHA 的护理专业人员在处理死亡和临终问题上的集体观点。本研究旨在调查专业人员对 SHA 中姑息(告别)文化的看法。

方法

本研究对在 SHA 工作的护士和护理助理进行了两次小组讨论。使用文件方法分析数据,旨在制定关于集体姑息文化的专业定向框架。

结果

护士能够营造姑息(告别)文化。这导致这些 SHA 不使用临终关怀服务。与亲属的距离、短暂的临终过程或不完整的临终支持,可能使成功的姑息文化变得困难。根据在 SHA 的护理概念中对姑息文化有意识地承担责任,与亲属和依赖护理的人在早期就讨论死亡和临终问题。

讨论

SHA 中不断发展的姑息文化基于护士的经验、全科医生(GP)和亲属。家庭护理人员的角色模棱两可。如果他们从专业护士的角度做他们应该做的事情,并与护士密切联系,他们就会被视为姑息文化的推动者,并受到积极评价。如果没有沟通家庭护理人员的责任,并且他们与专业护士没有密切联系,他们就会被视为姑息文化的反对者。在这两次讨论中,全科医生都被视为姑息文化的推动者。及时讨论生命末期可能发生的事情,无论是正式的还是非正式的,都有助于所有相关群体做好准备。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97a/11208262/5ddfce1a9451/391_2024_2313_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97a/11208262/2da6210741b2/391_2024_2313_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97a/11208262/803c0d303000/391_2024_2313_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97a/11208262/5ddfce1a9451/391_2024_2313_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97a/11208262/2da6210741b2/391_2024_2313_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97a/11208262/803c0d303000/391_2024_2313_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b97a/11208262/5ddfce1a9451/391_2024_2313_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Palliative (farewell) culture in shared housing arrangements : The perspective of everyday nursing practice.共居安排中的姑息(临终)文化:日常护理实践的观点。
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2024 Jul;57(4):284-289. doi: 10.1007/s00391-024-02313-4. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
2
Early and late signs that precede dying among older persons in nursing homes: the multidisciplinary team's perspective.养老院中老年人临终前的早期和晚期征象:多学科团队的观点。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jun 4;18(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0825-0.
3
Nutritional status of care-dependent people with dementia in shared-housing arrangements--a one-year follow-up.共享住房安排中失智且需护理者的营养状况——一年随访
Scand J Caring Sci. 2015 Dec;29(4):785-92. doi: 10.1111/scs.12210. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
4
[Shared-housing arrangements for care dependent older persons. Support from family members and volunteers].[为需要护理的老年人提供合住安排。来自家庭成员和志愿者的支持]
Pflege Z. 2011 Nov;64(11):666-71.
5
A qualitative study of nurses' perspective about the impact of end-of-life communication on the goal of end-of-life care in nursing home.一项关于护士对临终关怀目标影响的定性研究:护理院的临终沟通。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2021 Jun;35(2):502-511. doi: 10.1111/scs.12862. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
6
[Palliative culture in the stationary care for the elderly].[老年人长期护理中的姑息治疗文化]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2003 Oct;36(5):360-5. doi: 10.1007/s00391-003-0175-0.
7
Ethics and gender issues in palliative care in nursing homes: an Austrian participatory research project.养老院姑息治疗中的伦理和性别问题:奥地利参与式研究项目。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2014 Jun;9(2):131-9. doi: 10.1111/opn.12049.
8
[Comparison of the nutritional status of residents in shared-housing arrangements and nursing homes: a secondary data analysis].共享住房安排与养老院居民营养状况比较:二次数据分析
Pflege Z. 2014 Apr;67(4):224-9.
9
Palliative care for advanced dementia: Knowledge and attitudes of long-term care staff.晚期痴呆症的姑息治疗:长期护理人员的知识和态度。
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Feb;27(3-4):848-858. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14132. Epub 2017 Dec 13.
10
Quality of dying among elderly people diagnosed with dementia in nursing homes: A mixed methods study.养老院中被诊断为痴呆症的老年人的临终质量:一项混合方法研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2023 Jun;30(3):435-450. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12871. Epub 2022 Sep 18.

本文引用的文献

1
An overview of innovative living arrangements within long-term care and their characteristics: a scoping review.长期护理中创新生活安排及其特征概述:范围综述。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jul 18;23(1):442. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04158-9.
2
[Influencing factors for nursing home admission in case of pre-existing need of care - a systematic review].[已有护理需求情况下养老院入住的影响因素——一项系统综述]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2020 Aug;153-154:60-75. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2020.05.001. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
3
[Community-based housing communities : Inventory, qualitative classification and recommendations for action].
[基于社区的住房社区:清单、定性分类及行动建议]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2020 Oct;53(6):491-497. doi: 10.1007/s00391-020-01713-6. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
4
[Care preferences of the German population: the option of assisted residential groups].[德国民众的护理偏好:辅助居住群体选项]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2020 Oct;53(6):522-530. doi: 10.1007/s00391-019-01656-7. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
5
Implementing an advance care planning program in German nursing homes: results of an inter-regionally controlled intervention trial.在德国养老院实施预先护理计划方案:一项跨区域对照干预试验的结果。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014 Jan 24;111(4):50-7. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2014.0050.
6
Reasons for institutionalization of people with dementia: informal caregiver reports from 8 European countries.导致痴呆患者住院的原因:来自 8 个欧洲国家的非专业照护者报告
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Feb;15(2):108-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.09.012. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
7
[Shared-housing arrangements for care-dependent older persons - characteristics, development and drivers].[为需要护理的老年人提供的共享住房安排——特点、发展及驱动因素]
Pflege. 2011 Apr;24(2):97-109. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000105.
8
Age-related predictors of institutionalization: results of the German study on ageing, cognition and dementia in primary care patients (AgeCoDe).与年龄相关的住院预测因素:初级保健患者老龄化、认知和痴呆的德国研究(AgeCoDe)的结果。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Feb;47(2):263-70. doi: 10.1007/s00127-010-0333-9. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
9
[Living and dying in community based housing for people with dementia. An exploratory qualitative study].[痴呆症患者在社区住房中的生活与死亡。一项探索性定性研究]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2010 Oct;43(5):285-90. doi: 10.1007/s00391-010-0140-7.
10
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.定性研究报告的统一标准(COREQ):访谈和焦点小组的32项清单
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. Epub 2007 Sep 14.