Suppr超能文献

通过直接免疫荧光、免疫电渗电泳和乳胶凝集法证实了α链球菌与多价肺炎球菌血清Omniserum之间的交叉反应。

Cross-reactions between alpha-streptococci and Omniserum, a polyvalent pneumococcal serum, demonstrated by direct immunofluorescence, immunoelectroosmophoresis, and latex agglutination.

作者信息

Holmberg H, Danielsson D, Hardie J, Krook A, Whiley R

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1985 May;21(5):745-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.21.5.745-748.1985.

Abstract

In recent years several groups have used serological methods to demonstrate pneumococcal capsular antigens in sputum. In the present study 123 strains of alpha-hemolytic streptococci (including 97 strains from sputum or pharyngeal specimens) were tested for cross-reactions with a polyvalent antipneumococcal serum (Omniserum). Representatives of the following species were included: Streptococcus bovis, S. equinus, S. intermedius, S. lactis, S. milleri, S. mitis, S. mutans, S. sobrinus, S. salivarius, S. sanguis, S. suis, and Aerococcus viridans. Serological reactions were detected by direct immunofluorescence, immunoelectroosmophoresis, and latex agglutination. Fifteen (12%) of the strains gave positive reactions by all three methods. Positive reactions were also observed with another 32 strains (26%) with two of the methods, whereas 37 strains (30%) gave positive reactions by just one technique. Altogether 84 (68%) strains gave positive reactions with one or more of the methods. Latex agglutination gave positive reactions with 26 (21%) strains compared with 57 (46%) in immunofluorescence and 63 (51%) in immunoelectroosmophoresis. Absorption of the antiserum with one alpha-hemolytic strain reduced but did not entirely eliminate the cross-reactions with five tested strains. These findings indicate a potential risk of cross-reactions with polyvalent antipneumococcal serum in tests carried out on sputa or other specimens which may be contaminated with alpha-hemolytic streptococci.

摘要

近年来,有几个研究小组使用血清学方法在痰液中检测肺炎球菌荚膜抗原。在本研究中,对123株α-溶血性链球菌(包括97株来自痰液或咽部分泌物的菌株)进行了检测,以确定它们与一种多价抗肺炎球菌血清(全效血清)的交叉反应。其中包括以下菌种的代表:牛链球菌、马肠链球菌、中间链球菌、乳酸链球菌、米勒链球菌、轻链球菌、变形链球菌、远缘链球菌、唾液链球菌、血链球菌、猪链球菌和绿色气球菌。通过直接免疫荧光、免疫电渗电泳和乳胶凝集检测血清学反应。15株(12%)菌株通过所有三种方法均呈现阳性反应。另外32株(26%)菌株通过其中两种方法呈现阳性反应,而37株(30%)菌株仅通过一种技术呈现阳性反应。总共有84株(68%)菌株通过一种或多种方法呈现阳性反应。乳胶凝集法检测到26株(21%)菌株呈现阳性反应,相比之下,免疫荧光法检测到57株(46%),免疫电渗电泳法检测到63株(51%)。用一株α-溶血性菌株吸收抗血清后,与5株受试菌株的交叉反应有所减少,但并未完全消除。这些发现表明,在对可能被α-溶血性链球菌污染的痰液或其他标本进行检测时,使用多价抗肺炎球菌血清存在交叉反应的潜在风险。

相似文献

7
Antigens of Streptococcus sanguis.血链球菌抗原。
Infect Immun. 1973 Feb;7(2):205-11. doi: 10.1128/iai.7.2.205-211.1973.

引用本文的文献

8
Rapid bacterial antigen detection is not clinically useful.快速细菌抗原检测在临床上并无用处。
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jun;33(6):1486-91. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.6.1486-1491.1995.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验