• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

接受临床服务的选择性基因组检测患者的态度、知识和风险认知。

Attitudes, knowledge, and risk perceptions of patients who received elective genomic testing as a clinical service.

机构信息

Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA.

Sanford Imagenetics, Sioux Falls, SD; Department of Genetic Counseling, Augustana University, Sioux Falls, SD.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2024 Oct;26(10):101200. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101200. Epub 2024 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.gim.2024.101200
PMID:38943480
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11456384/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Elective genomic testing (EGT) is increasingly available clinically. Limited real-world evidence exists about attitudes and knowledge of EGT recipients.

METHODS

After web-based education, patients who enrolled in an EGT program at a rural nonprofit health care system completed a survey that assessed attitudes, knowledge, and risk perceptions.

RESULTS

From August 2020 to April 2022, 5920 patients completed the survey and received testing. Patients most frequently cited interest in learning their personal disease risks as their primary motivation. Patients most often expected results to guide medication management (74.0%), prevent future disease (70.4%), and provide information about risks to offspring (65.4%). Patients were "very concerned" most frequently about the privacy of genetic information (19.8%) and how well testing predicted disease risks (18.0%). On average, patients answered 6.7 of 11 knowledge items correctly (61.3%). They more often rated their risks for colon and breast cancers as lower rather than higher than the average person but more often rated their risk for a heart attack as higher rather than lower than the average person (all P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Patients pursued EGT because of the utility expectations but often misunderstood the test's capabilities.

摘要

目的

选择性基因组检测(EGT)在临床上的应用越来越广泛。关于 EGT 接受者的态度和知识,实际证据有限。

方法

在进行了基于网络的教育之后,在农村非营利性医疗保健系统中参加 EGT 计划的患者完成了一项调查,该调查评估了他们的态度、知识和风险认知。

结果

2020 年 8 月至 2022 年 4 月,共有 5920 名患者完成了调查并接受了检测。患者最常提到的主要动机是对了解个人疾病风险的兴趣。患者最常期望检测结果能够指导药物管理(74.0%)、预防未来疾病(70.4%)以及提供有关后代风险的信息(65.4%)。患者最常“非常关注”遗传信息的隐私问题(19.8%)和检测对疾病风险预测的准确性(18.0%)。平均而言,患者答对了 11 个知识项目中的 6.7 个(61.3%)。他们经常认为自己患结肠癌和乳腺癌的风险低于一般人,但更常认为自己患心脏病的风险高于一般人(均<0.001)。

结论

患者因为期望检测有实用价值而进行 EGT,但他们往往对检测的能力存在误解。

相似文献

1
Attitudes, knowledge, and risk perceptions of patients who received elective genomic testing as a clinical service.接受临床服务的选择性基因组检测患者的态度、知识和风险认知。
Genet Med. 2024 Oct;26(10):101200. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2024.101200. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
2
Adopted individuals' interest in elective genomic testing.被收养者对选择性基因组检测的兴趣。
J Med Genet. 2022 Feb;59(2):197-203. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107503. Epub 2020 Dec 21.
3
Playing a part in research? University students' attitudes to direct-to-consumer genomics.参与研究?大学生对直接面向消费者的基因组学的态度。
Public Health Genomics. 2014;17(3):158-68. doi: 10.1159/000360257. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
4
Predispositional genome sequencing in healthy adults: design, participant characteristics, and early outcomes of the PeopleSeq Consortium.健康成年人的倾向性全基因组测序:PeopleSeq 联盟的设计、参与者特征和早期结果。
Genome Med. 2019 Feb 27;11(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13073-019-0619-9.
5
Primary Care Providers' Experiences With an Active Elective Genetic Testing Program.初级保健提供者参与主动选择性基因检测项目的经历。
Health Educ Behav. 2025 Feb;52(1):28-37. doi: 10.1177/10901981241266849. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
6
Elective genetic testing: Genetics professionals' perspectives and practices.选择性基因检测:遗传学专业人士的观点与实践。
J Genet Couns. 2023 Jun;32(3):607-617. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1666. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
7
Patient and provider attitudes toward genomic testing for prostate cancer susceptibility: a mixed method study.患者和医疗服务提供者对前列腺癌易感性基因检测的态度:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jul 20;13:279. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-279.
8
Women's perception, attitudes, and intended behavior towards predictive epigenetic risk testing for female cancers in 5 European countries: a cross-sectional online survey.5 个欧洲国家女性对女性癌症预测性表观遗传学风险检测的认知、态度和预期行为:一项跨欧洲国家的在线横断面调查。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 30;19(1):667. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6994-8.
9
Prescription medication changes following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing: findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.直接面向消费者的个人基因组检测后的处方药变化:个人基因组学(PGen)研究的影响结果。
Genet Med. 2017 May;19(5):537-545. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.141. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
10
Genomics knowledge and attitudes among European public health professionals: Results of a cross-sectional survey.欧洲公共卫生专业人员的基因组学知识和态度:一项横断面调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 2;15(4):e0230749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230749. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of a pharmacogenomics (PGx) clinic on patient satisfaction and PGx literacy.药物基因组学(PGx)诊所对患者满意度和药物基因组学知识水平的影响。
Pharmacogenomics. 2025 Jan-Feb;26(1-2):23-29. doi: 10.1080/14622416.2025.2481015. Epub 2025 Mar 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Attitudes about pharmacogenomic testing vary by healthcare specialty.不同医疗专业对药物基因组检测的态度存在差异。
Pharmacogenomics. 2023 Jul;24(10):539-549. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2023-0039. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
2
gene-based clinical decision support reduces statin-associated muscle symptoms risk with simvastatin.基于基因的临床决策支持可降低辛伐他汀相关肌肉症状风险。
Pharmacogenomics. 2023 May;24(7):399-409. doi: 10.2217/pgs-2023-0056. Epub 2023 May 26.
3
Population Genomic Screening for Three Common Hereditary Conditions : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
三种常见遗传性疾病的人群基因组筛查:成本效益分析
Ann Intern Med. 2023 May;176(5):585-595. doi: 10.7326/M22-0846. Epub 2023 May 9.
4
Workforce Considerations When Building a Precision Medicine Program.构建精准医学项目时的劳动力考量
J Pers Med. 2022 Nov 19;12(11):1929. doi: 10.3390/jpm12111929.
5
Public Interest in Population Genetic Screening for Cancer Risk.公众对癌症风险人群基因筛查的关注。
Front Genet. 2022 Jul 22;13:886640. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.886640. eCollection 2022.
6
Improved provider preparedness through an 8-part genetics and genomic education program.通过一个包含 8 部分的遗传学和基因组学教育计划提高提供者的准备水平。
Genet Med. 2022 Jan;24(1):214-224. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2021.08.008. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
7
Implementing Primary Care Mediated Population Genetic Screening Within an Integrated Health System.在综合卫生系统中实施初级保健介导的人口遗传筛查。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 Jul-Aug;34(4):861-865. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2021.04.200381.
8
Precision Population Medicine in Primary Care: The Sanford Chip Experience.基层医疗中的精准人群医学:桑福德芯片项目经验
Front Genet. 2021 Mar 12;12:626845. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.626845. eCollection 2021.
9
Patient-Reported Outcomes and Experiences with Population Genetic Testing Offered Through a Primary Care Network.患者报告的通过初级保健网络提供的群体遗传检测的结果和体验。
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2021 Feb;25(2):152-160. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2020.0275.
10
Effect of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Statin Myopathy Risk vs Usual Care on Blood Cholesterol: A Randomized Clinical Trial.他汀类药物致肌病风险的药物遗传学检测与常规治疗对血脂的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2027092. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.27092.