• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神分裂症形态学特征在两个独立样本中的累积影响

Cumulative Impact of Morphometric Features in Schizophrenia in Two Independent Samples.

作者信息

Lee-Hughes Rosa, Lancaster Thomas M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK.

出版信息

Schizophr Bull Open. 2023 Nov 4;4(1):sgad031. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgad031. eCollection 2023 Jan.

DOI:10.1093/schizbullopen/sgad031
PMID:39145335
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11207677/
Abstract

Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder share a common structural brain alteration profile. However, there is considerable between- and within-diagnosis variability in these features, which may underestimate informative individual differences. Using a recently established morphometric risk score (MRS) approach, we aim to provide confirmation that individual MRS scores are higher in individuals with a psychosis diagnosis, helping to parse individual heterogeneity. Using the Human Connectome Project Early Psychosis ( = 124), we estimate MRS for psychosis and specifically for bipolar/schizophrenia using T1-weighted MRI data and prior meta-analysis effect sizes. We confirm associations in an independent replication sample ( = 69). We assess (1) the impact of diagnosis on these MRS, (2) compare effect sizes of MRS to all individual, cytoarchitecturally defined brain regions, and (3) perform negative control analyses to assess MRS specificity. The MRS specifically for SCZ was higher in the whole psychosis group (Cohen's = 0.56;  = 0.003) and outperformed any single region of interest in standardized mean difference (Z = 2.597;  = 0.009) and correlated with previously reported effect sizes (P < 0.005). MRS without Enhancing Neuroimaging Genomics through Meta-Analysis weights did not delineate groups with empirically null associations ( = 2.29;  = 0.02). We replicate MRS specifically for SCZ associations in the independent sample. Akin to polygenic risk scoring and individual allele effect sizes, these observations suggest that assessing the combined impact of regional structural alterations may be more informative than any single cytoarchitecturally constrained cortical region, where well-powered, meta-analytical samples are informative in the delineation of diagnosis and within psychosis case differences, in smaller independent samples.

摘要

精神分裂症和双相情感障碍具有共同的大脑结构改变特征。然而,这些特征在诊断之间和诊断内部存在相当大的变异性,这可能会低估个体间有价值的差异。使用最近建立的形态测量风险评分(MRS)方法,我们旨在证实精神病诊断个体的个体MRS评分更高,这有助于剖析个体异质性。利用人类连接组计划早期精神病样本(n = 124),我们使用T1加权MRI数据和先前的荟萃分析效应大小来估计精神病以及双相情感障碍/精神分裂症的MRS。我们在一个独立的复制样本(n = 69)中证实了相关性。我们评估(1)诊断对这些MRS的影响,(2)将MRS的效应大小与所有个体的、细胞结构定义的脑区进行比较,以及(3)进行阴性对照分析以评估MRS的特异性。在整个精神病组中,专门针对精神分裂症的MRS更高(科恩d = 0.56;P = 0.003),在标准化平均差异方面优于任何单个感兴趣区域(Z = 2.597;P = 0.009),并且与先前报道的效应大小相关(P < 0.005)。没有通过荟萃分析权重增强神经影像基因组学的MRS未能区分具有经验性零关联的组(P = 2.29;P = 0.02)。我们在独立样本中复制了专门针对精神分裂症相关性的MRS。类似于多基因风险评分和个体等位基因效应大小,这些观察结果表明,评估区域结构改变的综合影响可能比任何单个细胞结构受限的皮质区域更具信息量,在较小的独立样本中,样本量充足的荟萃分析样本在诊断的界定和精神病病例内部差异方面具有指导意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e131/11207677/a0d1bafb63a8/sgad031_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e131/11207677/184fb80fb929/sgad031_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e131/11207677/a397f8a1bc2f/sgad031_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e131/11207677/21e3b061056b/sgad031_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e131/11207677/a0d1bafb63a8/sgad031_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e131/11207677/184fb80fb929/sgad031_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e131/11207677/a397f8a1bc2f/sgad031_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e131/11207677/21e3b061056b/sgad031_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e131/11207677/a0d1bafb63a8/sgad031_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Cumulative Impact of Morphometric Features in Schizophrenia in Two Independent Samples.精神分裂症形态学特征在两个独立样本中的累积影响
Schizophr Bull Open. 2023 Nov 4;4(1):sgad031. doi: 10.1093/schizbullopen/sgad031. eCollection 2023 Jan.
2
Morphometric Analysis of Structural MRI Using Schizophrenia Meta-analytic Priors Distinguish Patients from Controls in Two Independent Samples and in a Sample of Individuals With High Polygenic Risk.基于精神分裂症元分析先验的结构 MRI 的形态计量学分析在两个独立样本及高多基因风险个体样本中区分患者与对照
Schizophr Bull. 2022 Mar 1;48(2):524-532. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbab125.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Structural and Functional Neuroimaging of Polygenic Risk for Schizophrenia: A Recall-by-Genotype-Based Approach.多基因风险与精神分裂症的结构和功能神经影像学:基于基因型召回的方法。
Schizophr Bull. 2019 Mar 7;45(2):405-414. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sby037.
5
Morphometry and gyrification in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: A comparative MRI study.双相情感障碍和精神分裂症中的形态测量与脑回形成:一项比较性磁共振成像研究。
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;26:102220. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102220. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
6
Association of Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures With Psychosis Onset in Individuals at Clinical High Risk for Developing Psychosis: An ENIGMA Working Group Mega-analysis.结构磁共振成像指标与处于精神病发病高风险的个体出现精神病的关联性:一项 ENIGMA 工作组的荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 1;78(7):753-766. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0638.
7
How do substance use disorders compare to other psychiatric conditions on structural brain abnormalities? A cross-disorder meta-analytic comparison using the ENIGMA consortium findings.物质使用障碍与其他精神疾病在结构脑异常方面有何不同?使用 ENIGMA 联盟研究结果的跨疾病荟萃分析比较。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Jan;43(1):399-413. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25114. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
8
Associated Genetics and Connectomic Circuitry in Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder.精神分裂症和双相情感障碍的相关遗传学和连接组学电路。
Biol Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 15;94(2):174-183. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2022.11.006. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
9
Transdiagnostic Multimodal Neuroimaging in Psychosis: Structural, Resting-State, and Task Magnetic Resonance Imaging Correlates of Cognitive Control.精神分裂症的跨诊断多模态神经影像学:认知控制的结构、静息态和任务磁共振成像相关性。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2019 Oct;4(10):870-880. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 20.
10
Disrupted Intersubject Variability Architecture in Functional Connectomes in Schizophrenia.精神分裂症功能连接组中被扰乱的主体间变异性结构。
Schizophr Bull. 2021 Apr 29;47(3):837-848. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa155.

本文引用的文献

1
Leveraging the adolescent brain cognitive development study to improve behavioral prediction from neuroimaging in smaller replication samples.利用青少年大脑认知发展研究提高神经影像学在较小复制样本中行为预测的能力。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Jun 4;34(6). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae223.
2
Brain correlates of speech perception in schizophrenia patients with and without auditory hallucinations.精神分裂症患者有无幻听时言语感知的大脑相关性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 16;17(12):e0276975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276975. eCollection 2022.
3
Brain-wide versus genome-wide vulnerability biomarkers for severe mental illnesses.
全脑与全基因组易损性生物标志物与严重精神疾病。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Nov;43(16):4970-4983. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26056. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
4
Neuroanatomical heterogeneity and homogeneity in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis.个体在精神病临床高危状态下的神经解剖异质性和同质性。
Transl Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 26;12(1):297. doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-02057-y.
5
Identifying common and distinct subcortical volumetric abnormalities in 3 major psychiatric disorders: a single-site analysis of 640 participants.在 3 种主要精神障碍中识别常见和独特的皮质下容积异常:640 名参与者的单站点分析。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2022 Jun 21;47(3):E230-E238. doi: 10.1503/jpn.210154. Print 2022 May-Jun.
6
Brain charts for the human lifespan.人类寿命的大脑图谱。
Nature. 2022 Apr;604(7906):525-533. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04554-y. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
7
Cell type-specific manifestations of cortical thickness heterogeneity in schizophrenia.精神分裂症皮质厚度异质性的细胞类型特异性表现。
Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Apr;27(4):2052-2060. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01460-7. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
8
Morphometric Analysis of Structural MRI Using Schizophrenia Meta-analytic Priors Distinguish Patients from Controls in Two Independent Samples and in a Sample of Individuals With High Polygenic Risk.基于精神分裂症元分析先验的结构 MRI 的形态计量学分析在两个独立样本及高多基因风险个体样本中区分患者与对照
Schizophr Bull. 2022 Mar 1;48(2):524-532. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbab125.
9
Improving the predictive potential of diffusion MRI in schizophrenia using normative models-Towards subject-level classification.利用规范模型提高精神分裂症扩散 MRI 的预测能力——迈向个体水平分类。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Oct 1;42(14):4658-4670. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25574. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
10
Going deep into schizophrenia with artificial intelligence.人工智能深入探索精神分裂症。
Schizophr Res. 2022 Jul;245:122-140. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2021.05.018. Epub 2021 Jun 5.